Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Contains threads on Royal Air Force equipment of the past, present and future.
Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Mercator »

Two or three years slower than I thought they would go for.

Jdam
Member
Posts: 922
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Jdam »

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2022/04 ... ace-awacs/

2027, I must admit I thought they would have wanted a quicker turn around than that.

Also I am surprised they are buying off the shelf, now all we need to do is tack 2 more on their order for ourselves ;)
These users liked the author Jdam for the post:
Lord Jim

User avatar
Halidon
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: 12 May 2015, 01:34
United States of America

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Halidon »

Jdam wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 00:01 https://www.defensenews.com/air/2022/04 ... ace-awacs/

2027, I must admit I thought they would have wanted a quicker turn around than that.

Also I am surprised they are buying off the shelf, now all we need to do is tack 2 more on their order for ourselves ;)
Some speculation that the extra few years are for either updates to MESA or migrating the existing suite to a MAX airframe. WE'll see.

Little J
Member
Posts: 973
Joined: 02 May 2015, 14:35
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Little J »

Would they really want to go to a MAX airframe? :wtf:

And that's assuming that Boeing pays off Capital Hill to get the extension they need to fudge the air worthiness... :mrgreen:

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Mercator »

Halidon wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 22:21
Jdam wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 00:01 https://www.defensenews.com/air/2022/04 ... ace-awacs/

2027, I must admit I thought they would have wanted a quicker turn around than that.

Also I am surprised they are buying off the shelf, now all we need to do is tack 2 more on their order for ourselves ;)
Some speculation that the extra few years are for either updates to MESA or migrating the existing suite to a MAX airframe. WE'll see.
Jeez, if it's the 737 Max they will be buying into a whole boatload of risk. The whole C of G changes requiring serious flight tests (remembering that there are extra dorsal fins for stability on the E-7A). I'd be amazed if that's it. It's possible they wish to jump ahead a generation with the Mesa, however. Less risk if they can keep it inside the same profile. I hope that's it – it would be great for every operator. It would revitalise the entire capability while still being a very viable upgrade for existing operators.

User avatar
Halidon
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: 12 May 2015, 01:34
United States of America

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Halidon »

Mercator wrote: 28 Apr 2022, 00:16
Halidon wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 22:21
Jdam wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 00:01 https://www.defensenews.com/air/2022/04 ... ace-awacs/

2027, I must admit I thought they would have wanted a quicker turn around than that.

Also I am surprised they are buying off the shelf, now all we need to do is tack 2 more on their order for ourselves ;)
Some speculation that the extra few years are for either updates to MESA or migrating the existing suite to a MAX airframe. WE'll see.
Jeez, if it's the 737 Max they will be buying into a whole boatload of risk. The whole C of G changes requiring serious flight tests (remembering that there are extra dorsal fins for stability on the E-7A). I'd be amazed if that's it. It's possible they wish to jump ahead a generation with the Mesa, however. Less risk if they can keep it inside the same profile. I hope that's it – it would be great for every operator. It would revitalise the entire capability while still being a very viable upgrade for existing operators.
MESA (and other gear) upgrades would get my vote, but I felt it was worth mentioning the MAX possibility. This is USAF, it could easily be their plan to do both :shock:

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Mercator »


Jdam
Member
Posts: 922
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Jdam »

Boeing E-7 B incoming by the sounds of it.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5657
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by SW1 »

Boeing

737max design airworthiness authority removed by faa selling each a/c at a 20% loss
787 deliveries remains suspended (approaching 737 duration) design airworthiness authority removed by faa
777x pushed right 4 years due to serious test failure and faa concerns similar to 737 max

New narrowbody/regional plane imminent!

New airforce one way way over budget and late
T7 in trouble cost overruns schedule going right
KC46 tanker late and not working properly

We need a new 4 year development program for awac US gov sure here have some cash……

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1409
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by tomuk »

What did I say before. The USAF aren't going to buy E7 as is far too easy. Too much pork barrelling required.
These users liked the author tomuk for the post:
Jdam

Little J
Member
Posts: 973
Joined: 02 May 2015, 14:35
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Little J »

USAF : We need this urgently to replace our knackered old E-3's.

Also USAF : We just want to change a shit load of parts first.

:wtf: :crazy:
These users liked the author Little J for the post (total 2):
JdamMercator

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Mercator »

...Boeing has said it will supply an “open architecture” version of the E-7 to USAF, which would allow other companies to supply systems for the aircraft, but the existing version does not have this capability.
https://www.airforcemag.com/air-force-a ... ace-awacs/

SouthernOne
Member
Posts: 122
Joined: 23 Nov 2019, 00:01
Australia

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by SouthernOne »

Likely the open architecture system first fight tested back in 2020 on a RAAF E-7.
These users liked the author SouthernOne for the post:
Mercator

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Mercator »

These users liked the author Mercator for the post (total 2):
Lord Jimwargame_insomniac

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by wargame_insomniac »

Agree- three UK E7's just feels too few. Ideally we should order one per year for the next three years, to spread the cost.

Then again we need more P8 MPA and more F35B's so it will require additional funds allocated to defence and then juggling of MOD priorites.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5657
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by SW1 »

there isn’t crew to man what currently is on order and delivered so adding more won’t do much.

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1409
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by tomuk »

Maybe it would be better to wait a few year until the USAF have actually received some E7s so we can get the same version

Online
Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1701
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Scimitar54 »

Or handover F35B and P8 crewing to the RN (Along with the Aircraft naturally). With headcount transfers, the RAF should still gain some spare resource as the RN works its assets to a greater degree. :mrgreen:

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Lord Jim »

Passing the F-25Bs to the Fleet Air Arm would make sense, but they to are short of personnel, especially pilots. If it was decided to go that route it would take a good few years to being the number of pilots up to the numbers required, also taking into account RAF and foreign exchange officers.

The P-87s as with previous MPAs have always been the purview of the RAF since its formation. Having exchange crew should be encouraged, especially operators in the cabin with experience of ASW etc.

Shortfalls in personnel should be seen as an urgent and essential requirement going forward and this if anything should be cause for new money to be given to the MoD to begin to increase numbers to meet the tasks at hand as well as increasing the reserves.
These users liked the author Lord Jim for the post (total 2):
wargame_insomniacserge750

Jdam
Member
Posts: 922
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Jdam »

How much more manpower would 2 more E-7 need? (assuming 5 is enough)

Online
Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1701
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Scimitar54 »

LJ. Alas, you did not read my post properly, “Transfer of Crewing” (and Headcount) …. Not just the responsibility to provide it.

FAA Pilots & Maintainers provide extra value in terms of availability for deployment, so not all of the current F”3”5 personnel would need to transfer, or as an alternative way of looking at it, not so many RAF resources would be required for the second (and subsequent) Front Line F35B Squadrons either.

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Mercator »

If Australian experience is anything to go by, you can gain a lot of synergy with your MPA workforce – aircrew and maintainers. All of the backend EW guys in Australian E-7A are ex-P3/P8 (EW) sensor operators. There are even a few Navigators that have gone over from the MPA world and found a new home in air defence (there's lots of similarities, and of course the surface battle is the same). But the pilots have the easiest transition and there's a lot of crossover in our Air Force. It helps that they are managed in the same Force Element Group as well. It's easier to share people than to pinch them with no intention of giving them back.

For maintainers, well they are both 737s and both Boeing products. I'm pretty sure after the next upgrade, they will even be sharing the same workstations/displays. All very similar.
These users liked the author Mercator for the post (total 2):
wargame_insomniacLord Jim

topman
Member
Posts: 771
Joined: 07 May 2015, 20:56
Tokelau

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by topman »

I bet you could increase manpower in the E-7 fleet, and any chance of manning additional a/c, by moving it to waddo...

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by Mercator »

hmm:

Kendall hinted that the [US] Air Force could seek to work with Boeing and other 737 NG customers to get the jets earlier, saying that options to expedite procurement “are going to require some changes by people who we don’t necessarily have control of, in terms of their priorities.”
[US] Lawmakers press Air Force on speeding up purchase of Boeing E-7 Wedgetail
https://breakingdefense.com/2022/05/law ... wedgetail/

That might mean that they are thinking of purchasing a couple of used airframes, but I also thought it might mean they could approach other E-7A customers as well. Could be a good deal.
These users liked the author Mercator for the post:
Jensy

NickC
Donator
Posts: 1432
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Post by NickC »

The E-7 is not an open architecture system but proprietary which is a strike against it these days with the Pentagon, a Boeing director said software could be modified, but that would delay the program, how important that plays in USAF thinking anyone's guess.

Post Reply