UK Shipbuilding
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
Re: UK Shipbuilding
So what is that:-
25 x Large / Support Ships.
25 x Escort Ships
50 x Minor Vessels
In other words100 x ships over a 25 year cycle.
Much too simplistic to me. IMHO I can see the following problems:-
Are either the numbers of each vessel type, or the total number actually required, or realistic?
A total lack of flexibility in what each yard is able to construct. (For example, if this strategy was followed some10-15 years ago, there would not now be any QEC Carriers).
Just for the record, as a guiding principle I would rather see 2 x Yards building Escorts (at the rate of 1 every 2 years) than 1 x yard building them at a rate of 1 per year. This would give us the capability to “double” the production of Escorts, should the need arise (in this ever more dangerous world). I would also take the same approach with both Large / Support and Minor Vessels.
25 x Large / Support Ships.
25 x Escort Ships
50 x Minor Vessels
In other words100 x ships over a 25 year cycle.
Much too simplistic to me. IMHO I can see the following problems:-
Are either the numbers of each vessel type, or the total number actually required, or realistic?
A total lack of flexibility in what each yard is able to construct. (For example, if this strategy was followed some10-15 years ago, there would not now be any QEC Carriers).
Just for the record, as a guiding principle I would rather see 2 x Yards building Escorts (at the rate of 1 every 2 years) than 1 x yard building them at a rate of 1 per year. This would give us the capability to “double” the production of Escorts, should the need arise (in this ever more dangerous world). I would also take the same approach with both Large / Support and Minor Vessels.
Re: UK Shipbuilding
yes, simplified for discussion.Scimitar54 wrote: ↑04 Nov 2023, 01:28 So what is that:-
25 x Large / Support Ships.
25 x Escort Ships
50 x Minor Vessels
In other words100 x ships over a 25 year cycle.
Much too simplistic to me. IMHO I can see the following problems:-
Are either the numbers of each vessel type, or the total number actually required, or realistic?
A total lack of flexibility in what each yard is able to construct. (For example, if this strategy was followed some10-15 years ago, there would not now be any QEC Carriers).
Just for the record, as a guiding principle I would rather see 2 x Yards building Escorts (at the rate of 1 every 2 years) than 1 x yard building them at a rate of 1 per year. This would give us the capability to “double” the production of Escorts, should the need arise (in this ever more dangerous world). I would also take the same approach with both Large / Support and Minor Vessels.
QEC falls into the large category as does the amphibs.
As does OPV, MRSS, MCMV, Survey vessel e.c.t fall into minor vessels.
I spoke to others here and I too went for a 2 yard escort production, but many believed it unsuitable.
Re: UK Shipbuilding
1 Escort @ £900m every 18 months approx £600m pa (£c.£33.3m/month)
1 large ship @ £600m every 24 months approx. £300m pa (c. £25m/month)
1 minor vessel @ £150m every 6 months approx. £300m pa (would also allow for 1 tier 2 escort at £450m every 18 months). c. £25m/month
Edit:
Over a 24-year cycle that would be
16 Tier 1 escorts
12 Large ships
8 Tier 2 escorts & 24 minor vessels
Which seems quite close to what is planned, though some of the large ships are civilian conversions for specialist jobs
1 large ship @ £600m every 24 months approx. £300m pa (c. £25m/month)
1 minor vessel @ £150m every 6 months approx. £300m pa (would also allow for 1 tier 2 escort at £450m every 18 months). c. £25m/month
Edit:
Over a 24-year cycle that would be
16 Tier 1 escorts
12 Large ships
8 Tier 2 escorts & 24 minor vessels
Which seems quite close to what is planned, though some of the large ships are civilian conversions for specialist jobs
- These users liked the author Caribbean for the post:
- Poiuytrewq
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
Re: UK Shipbuilding
Making the assumption that you split it roughly 20%, 40%, 40%, and assuming that Tier One escort costs just rougly £800m to £1,000m, Tier Two escort costs roughly £400m to £500m, Tier Three patrol vessels costs roughly £200m to £250m, and that large support ship costs roughly £400m to £500m.
Then over a 30 years shipbuilding plan:
- With 40% of £1.2bn Budget, BAE Govan could make fifteen Tier One warfighting escorts, finishing one every two years e.g. 6*Destroyers followed by 9*ASW Frigates.
- With 20% of £1.2bn Budget, Babcock Rosyth could make a mixture of ten Tier Two global patrol escorts, finishing one every two years e.g. GP Frigates / Light Frigates, and Ten Tier Three patrol vessels / MCMV / MROSS, finishing one every year.
- With 40% of £1.2bn Budget, H&W Belfast could spend roughly 66% to 75% of time working for RN / RFA, and the balance on commercial work. That would allow them to make 10-12 support ships of the likes of the 3-4*tankers, 3*FSS, 2-3*LPD's, and 2-3 LSS (Logistics Support Ships i.e. Waves replacement e.g. BMT Ellida).
- H&W Appledore is a smaller yard and should be able to mainly survive on the myriad of larger boats and smaller ships that the commercial sector will need. But Appledore would be able to sub-contract and build modules for her Belfast sister company (it seems their specialism is doing the bow sections like they did on both carriers and will do on the forthcoming 3*FSS). If possible it makes sense to spread some of the work to them, especially if it avoids any of the other shipbuilders being unduly stretched.
Where it falls down if some ships are pushed beyond the useful working life, requiring ever more expenive refits and maintenance, becuase of excessive delays in ordering new ships, also risking construction experiencing feast and famine rather the rythmic drumbeat of orders. Which has happened a lot in the past few years....
I ahev also avoided BAE Barrow because they will be doing their own thing, finishing off the Dreadnought Class SSBN bfore moving onto AUKUS SSN, with some componenents for Aussie build boats and then building ones for RN (hopefully more than 7*RN SSN).
Re: UK Shipbuilding
Yes, I also left Barrow because it will be doing it's own thing, a.k.a all the subs.
As for appledore I would turn it into a Tier 3 (MCMV, MROSS, GPV, OPV, e.c.t) maintenance place as babcock does more and more construction and submarine deconstruction. This has been demonstrated with the MCMV's to Lithuania.
As for appledore I would turn it into a Tier 3 (MCMV, MROSS, GPV, OPV, e.c.t) maintenance place as babcock does more and more construction and submarine deconstruction. This has been demonstrated with the MCMV's to Lithuania.
- These users liked the author new guy for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
Re: UK Shipbuilding
I agree that maller ships such as OPV / MCMV / MROSS etc would fit in better with Appledore than Babcock. But I felt thatwould have left Babcock lacking work and that they deserve to at least be able to quote for work such as the Tier 3 vessels, given the investment they made in the covered shipyard.new guy wrote: ↑04 Nov 2023, 20:47 Yes, I also left Barrow because it will be doing it's own thing, a.k.a all the subs.
As for appledore I would turn it into a Tier 3 (MCMV, MROSS, GPV, OPV, e.c.t) maintenance place as babcock does more and more construction and submarine deconstruction. This has been demonstrated with the MCMV's to Lithuania.
Re: UK Shipbuilding
I said maintenance base, not manufacturing. My plan is all smaller / tier 3 vessels at babcock.wargame_insomniac wrote: ↑05 Nov 2023, 18:17I agree that maller ships such as OPV / MCMV / MROSS etc would fit in better with Appledore than Babcock. But I felt thatwould have left Babcock lacking work and that they deserve to at least be able to quote for work such as the Tier 3 vessels, given the investment they made in the covered shipyard.new guy wrote: ↑04 Nov 2023, 20:47 Yes, I also left Barrow because it will be doing it's own thing, a.k.a all the subs.
As for appledore I would turn it into a Tier 3 (MCMV, MROSS, GPV, OPV, e.c.t) maintenance place as babcock does more and more construction and submarine deconstruction. This has been demonstrated with the MCMV's to Lithuania.
Re: UK Shipbuilding
Appledore Shipyard looks to hire 100 new workers.
https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-ne ... 00-8883493
https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-ne ... 00-8883493
- These users liked the author Jackstar for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
-
- Member
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 26 May 2021, 11:45
Re: UK Shipbuilding
Any concerns regarding shipbuilding with the last steel blast furnaces in UK likely to be shut down over the next year?
- These users liked the author GarethDavies1 for the post (total 2):
- SW1 • wargame_insomniac
Re: UK Shipbuilding
We can’t make virgin steel anymore so wondered how that would affect in particular submarine construction and to an extent armoured vehicles too. Maybe we are just going to import it. 2000 jobs going too thanks to net zero madness.GarethDavies1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:08 Any concerns regarding shipbuilding with the last steel blast furnaces in UK likely to be shut down over the next year?
Re: UK Shipbuilding
Totally net zero's fault, give the government is pumping offshore licences all over the place.SW1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:13We can’t make virgin steel anymore so wondered how that would affect in particular submarine construction and to an extent armoured vehicles too. Maybe we are just going to import it. 2000 jobs going too thanks to net zero madness.GarethDavies1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:08 Any concerns regarding shipbuilding with the last steel blast furnaces in UK likely to be shut down over the next year?
Re: UK Shipbuilding
We import the steel already for armoured vehicles and ships and submarines. The current UK steelworks don't produce the required types.SW1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:13We can’t make virgin steel anymore so wondered how that would affect in particular submarine construction and to an extent armoured vehicles too. Maybe we are just going to import it. 2000 jobs going too thanks to net zero madness.GarethDavies1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:08 Any concerns regarding shipbuilding with the last steel blast furnaces in UK likely to be shut down over the next year?
Re: UK Shipbuilding
We import all steel for those or just some at present? And out of interest where from?tomuk wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 19:33We import the steel already for armoured vehicles and ships and submarines. The current UK steelworks don't produce the required types.SW1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:13We can’t make virgin steel anymore so wondered how that would affect in particular submarine construction and to an extent armoured vehicles too. Maybe we are just going to import it. 2000 jobs going too thanks to net zero madness.GarethDavies1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:08 Any concerns regarding shipbuilding with the last steel blast furnaces in UK likely to be shut down over the next year?
And would it not be more beneficial for the economy to produce the required steels
Re: UK Shipbuilding
On T26 35% of the steel by weight is British, the other 65% is Swedish.SW1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 19:34We import all steel for those or just some at present? And out of interest where from?tomuk wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 19:33We import the steel already for armoured vehicles and ships and submarines. The current UK steelworks don't produce the required types.SW1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:13We can’t make virgin steel anymore so wondered how that would affect in particular submarine construction and to an extent armoured vehicles too. Maybe we are just going to import it. 2000 jobs going too thanks to net zero madness.GarethDavies1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:08 Any concerns regarding shipbuilding with the last steel blast furnaces in UK likely to be shut down over the next year?
And would it not be more beneficial for the economy to produce the required steels
Re: UK Shipbuilding
- These users liked the author SW1 for the post (total 2):
- Tempest414 • wargame_insomniac
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5632
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: UK Shipbuilding
We should be aiming for 50% of all ship building steel from the UK across all projectstomuk wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 19:51On T26 35% of the steel by weight is British, the other 65% is Swedish.SW1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 19:34We import all steel for those or just some at present? And out of interest where from?tomuk wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 19:33We import the steel already for armoured vehicles and ships and submarines. The current UK steelworks don't produce the required types.SW1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:13We can’t make virgin steel anymore so wondered how that would affect in particular submarine construction and to an extent armoured vehicles too. Maybe we are just going to import it. 2000 jobs going too thanks to net zero madness.GarethDavies1 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 18:08 Any concerns regarding shipbuilding with the last steel blast furnaces in UK likely to be shut down over the next year?
And would it not be more beneficial for the economy to produce the required steels
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5632
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: UK Shipbuilding
Odd but what I said was we should be looking to have 50% UK steel in all UK ship building projects
Edit sorry my text got mixed up in tomuk's post
- These users liked the author Tempest414 for the post:
- new guy
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
Re: UK Shipbuilding
This would be perfect for H&W Appledore and would increase the portfolio of UK ship designs that we could offer to potential export customers.
- These users liked the author wargame_insomniac for the post (total 3):
- new guy • Poiuytrewq • Jackstar
Re: UK Shipbuilding
Good to have UK sovereign production of great design, but we ain't exporting to nobody when they could order strait from the source, the Aussie or Asian austal yards.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: UK Shipbuilding
Keeping busy.
- These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post (total 2):
- wargame_insomniac • Jackstar