
https://navynews.co.uk/archive/news/item/15695
What's the status of Crowsnest project? When will they become operational?
Fallon was talking about spring; I would be hard pressed to think of any other meaningful milestone exc. the one aboveshark bait wrote:Manufacture contract is going to be signed this year
Money?ArmChairCivvy wrote:But it is still a mystery why the winner was asked to rebid
Been thru this before. Brand new workstations.Timmymagic wrote:There was also a proposal for an AEW Dominie. Range was dreadful though.
Yes the Crowsnest solution will be a bagged radar. It is designed to be modular so will allegedly use the workstations onboard Merlin HM2.
Sorry about mis-recall about who won. So the field of regard may actually have been a factor (in winning)?Timmymagic wrote:Yes the Crowsnest solution will be a bagged radar
marktigger wrote: BTW at least with some in storage if one is written off they can generate a replacement
what is the expected OSD for Merlin ? since it's going to be around for a while then 8 might not be so bigArmChairCivvy wrote:
Finally a rationale that sticks - 8 is a big number, though?
1. Not rip out. Slide out. Both workstations can be swapped in and out as required.Lord Jim wrote:Why oh why are they going to rip out the work stations on upgraded HM2s when we have unmodified HM1s in storage still, unless these have been Christmas treed for spares. Typical MoD logic at play egged on by the Treasury probably.
The airframe is not big enough to do the roll-in/ roll-out (of complete modules, not just workstations) as in the Dragon suite by LM for , basically, transport aircraftRon5 wrote:Not rip out. Slide out.
Not sure about that. Certainly in the past combining 2 radar pictures together was problematic (particularly from 2 radars, rather than 2 aerials). But manufacturers seem to be more confident now. The Vigilance pods looked like a great idea, same radar as F-35 so cutting edge, electronic attack a possibility and possible use on other platforms plus less drag. The main reason I suspect was that Searchwater is a known system, its a cracking radar in itself and seems like a relatively simple programme. No complaints from me in that regard, I liked the look of Vigilance but can't fault the logic behind the procurement. The re-bid thing is worrying though...ArmChairCivvy wrote:Sorry about mis-recall about who won. So the field of regard may actually have been a factor (in winning)?
Team estimated 2 hours to reconfigure.ArmChairCivvy wrote:The airframe is not big enough to do the roll-in/ roll-out (of complete modules, not just workstations) as in the Dragon suite by LM for , basically, transport aircraftRon5 wrote:Not rip out. Slide out.
sensor fusion... even if it is "only" two radarsTimmymagic wrote:same radar as F-35 so cutting edge
pretty good.of course you will need to onboard the specialists as you sail (or fly them in later, if the threat picture changes from what initially was assessed)Ron5 wrote:Team estimated 2 hours to reconfigure.
That, and the capital expenditure upfront, maintaining two fleets that are so close to identical. You can imagine an "overload" situation at the TF level, so multiroleing the helos carried, according to the changing threat picture, is not to be sniffed at.Ron5 wrote:insurance against attrition.
I think the number (8, vs 10 kits ordered) says it all: they were kept as an insurance against the ro/ro solution actually not happening... and I think by now it has been proved feasible.marktigger wrote:, 19:16
i do wonder looking at the state of the "reserve" fleet if any of them will fly again