Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Contains threads on British Army equipment of the past, present and future.
RunningStrong
Senior Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by RunningStrong »

Timmymagic wrote: 14 Jan 2024, 09:52 If the Army have a braincell they'll purchase 2 Decoy systems for every Real one...
Counter-intelligence batteries have been discussed recently by a few people with experience.
These users liked the author RunningStrong for the post:
Jackstar

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Timmymagic »

RunningStrong wrote: 14 Jan 2024, 19:18
Timmymagic wrote: 14 Jan 2024, 09:52 If the Army have a braincell they'll purchase 2 Decoy systems for every Real one...
Counter-intelligence batteries have been discussed recently by a few people with experience.
It should be a question everyone is asking.

If the RAF aren't contacting the people who made the F-35 replicas for the deck handling school at RNAS Culdrose and ordering 20 for RAF Marham, for peanuts, they're daft....
These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post (total 2):
new guyChris Werb

Chris Werb
Member
Posts: 32
Joined: 12 Dec 2015, 22:21

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Chris Werb »

Probably old news to everyone here, but an FOI request I recently put in revealed that both BONUS and the SGR77 HE shell entered British Army service with Archer. Another request revealed that MLRS AT-2 and all other AT mines (including off-route) had been retired and that RAAMS was not used by the British Army. A request about Excalibur, M454 Super HE and PGK revealed that they had no information on these systems within the MoD, nor of any intention to adopt them.
These users liked the author Chris Werb for the post (total 3):
Ron5RunningStrongTimmymagic

RunningStrong
Senior Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by RunningStrong »

1RHA on Facebook stating that E Battery has retrained onto L118 and that AJAX conversion begins later in the year.

Interesting times!
These users liked the author RunningStrong for the post (total 2):
Chris WerbJackstar

Chris Werb
Member
Posts: 32
Joined: 12 Dec 2015, 22:21

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Chris Werb »

RunningStrong wrote: 31 Jan 2024, 11:33 1RHA on Facebook stating that E Battery has retrained onto L118 and that AJAX conversion begins later in the year.

Interesting times!
When they say conversion to AJAX, are they giving up the towed 105mm or operating the AJAX alongside it? Any idea how that works, doctrinally? It seems like an odd combination to have wheeled guns in a battery equipped with tracked AFVs. I can, however, remember 40 Field Regiment having some Alvis Sultan(?) when they were equipped with FH70 at Colchester, but that might just have been for trials.

RunningStrong
Senior Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by RunningStrong »

Chris Werb wrote: 31 Jan 2024, 13:58
RunningStrong wrote: 31 Jan 2024, 11:33 1RHA on Facebook stating that E Battery has retrained onto L118 and that AJAX conversion begins later in the year.

Interesting times!
When they say conversion to AJAX, are they giving up the towed 105mm or operating the AJAX alongside it? Any idea how that works, doctrinally? It seems like an odd combination to have wheeled guns in a battery equipped with tracked AFVs. I can, however, remember 40 Field Regiment having some Alvis Sultan(?) when they were equipped with FH70 at Colchester, but that might just have been for trials.
I think the AJAX conversion was a 1RHA regimental change, not a E battery change. Sorry if I confused. I assume. AJAX will be utilised by the FST team/troop within the SPG batteries.
These users liked the author RunningStrong for the post:
Chris Werb

Chris Werb
Member
Posts: 32
Joined: 12 Dec 2015, 22:21

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Chris Werb »

You worded it the same as on their Facebook, so any confusion isn't your fault. :) Thank you for the clarification.

sol
Member
Posts: 562
Joined: 01 Jul 2021, 09:11
Bosnia & Herzegovina

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by sol »

Archer is process of clearing for transport via C-17



According to Gabriel, apparently original Archer does not fit into A400, but he don't know if version mounted on MAN maybe can do it.
These users liked the author sol for the post (total 4):
jedibeeftrixRon5wargame_insomniacJackstar

RunningStrong
Senior Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by RunningStrong »

sol wrote: 03 Feb 2024, 10:40 Archer is process of clearing for transport via C-17



According to Gabriel, apparently original Archer does not fit into A400, but he don't know if version mounted on MAN maybe can do it.
Wikipedia page on Archer would suggest HX2 version is heavier and I imagine the Centre of Gravity also comes into play near the limit, especially as there's little space to adjust when loaded due to length.
These users liked the author RunningStrong for the post:
Jackstar

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7323
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Ron5 »

Thought it had wheels so it could self deploy :lol:

Jackstar
Member
Posts: 200
Joined: 19 Jun 2023, 17:02
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Jackstar »

British Gunners take aim and fire Swedish Archer for the first time.

https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events ... Innovation
These users liked the author Jackstar for the post:
SW1

Jackstar
Member
Posts: 200
Joined: 19 Jun 2023, 17:02
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Jackstar »

The harsh winter of Swedish Lapland is the ideal location for:

❄️ 3 Ranger to conduct Arctic training
🥶 Royal School of Artillery training on Archer
❄️ Ajax testing in wintry conditions

These users liked the author Jackstar for the post (total 2):
Ron5wargame_insomniac

leonard
Member
Posts: 191
Joined: 21 May 2016, 17:52
Italy

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by leonard »

For the Archer system the British Army has joined the club of the Bonus Mk 2 155 mm shell users.
https://x.com/ForcesOperation/status/17 ... 09365?s=20

RunningStrong
Senior Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by RunningStrong »

Tracks versus Wheels fundamentally is a strategic mobility decision....

Image


Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7323
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Ron5 »

Merthyr Tydfil is the UK's home for armoured vehicles???

Gimme a break.
These users liked the author Ron5 for the post:
SD67

sol
Member
Posts: 562
Joined: 01 Jul 2021, 09:11
Bosnia & Herzegovina

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by sol »

Driver training on Archer


SD67
Senior Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: 23 Jul 2019, 09:49
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by SD67 »

Ron5 wrote: 22 Mar 2024, 13:01 Merthyr Tydfil is the UK's home for armoured vehicles???

Gimme a break.
Was thinking the same...

sol
Member
Posts: 562
Joined: 01 Jul 2021, 09:11
Bosnia & Herzegovina

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by sol »

Seems like UK, together with Germany, might go with Boxer RCH 155 as a MFP solution
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will meet German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Berlin today [Wednesday] to deepen our defence and security cooperation.

As an initial step, the UK and Germany will announce plans for a joint endeavour to develop Remote-Controlled Howitzer 155mm Wheeled Artillery Systems (RCH 155), which will be fitted to Boxer vehicles.

The joint programme is expected to create hundreds of British and German jobs, while equipping our armed forces with battle-winning capabilities for future ground warfare.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-u ... artnership

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Timmymagic »

sol wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 09:41 Seems like UK, together with Germany, might go with Boxer RCH 155 as a MFP solution
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will meet German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Berlin today [Wednesday] to deepen our defence and security cooperation.

As an initial step, the UK and Germany will announce plans for a joint endeavour to develop Remote-Controlled Howitzer 155mm Wheeled Artillery Systems (RCH 155), which will be fitted to Boxer vehicles.

The joint programme is expected to create hundreds of British and German jobs, while equipping our armed forces with battle-winning capabilities for future ground warfare.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-u ... artnership
Seems pretty nailed on now. BAE wins either way. Have to say I think Archer might be a better system, but BAE's industrial offer on it was fairly derisory in comparison to RCH155.

Personally I'd be looking more at the MAN based version than Boxer and even the original DONAR programme on an Ajax chassis over a Boxer one...pity we can't get all 3...(mind you I'd also have moved M270 over to an Ajax chassis or a truck solution to try and achieve some commonality rather than operating a Bradley chassis version).
These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post:
wargame_insomniac

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Timmymagic »

Full confirmation...RCH155 it is.

These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post:
jedibeeftrix

Mr Carrot
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 27 May 2015, 15:07

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Mr Carrot »

Would I be incorrect in presuming the RCH turrets can be moved between boxer platforms?

Could we shift these specific turrets over to tracked boxer in future (presumably just with firmware updates)?

That solves the wheeled and tracked issue overnight....
These users liked the author Mr Carrot for the post:
Caribbean

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Timmymagic »

Mr Carrot wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 12:17 Would I be incorrect in presuming the RCH turrets can be moved between boxer platforms?

Could we shift these specific turrets over to tracked boxer in future (presumably just with firmware updates)?

That solves the wheeled and tracked issue overnight....
To be honest I'm not sure how 'modular' the RCH155 installation on Boxer is.

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4108
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Timmymagic wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:56 Have to say I think Archer might be a better system, but BAE's industrial offer on it was fairly derisory in comparison to RCH155.
What’s the cost difference?

Is this another gold plated solution?

Boxer hull plus RCH155 module looks like it could have a very high unit price.
These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post:
abc123

BB85
Member
Posts: 220
Joined: 09 Sep 2021, 20:17
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Post by BB85 »

There is more to it than just the unit price. If we consolidate the fleet around boxer we are benefitting from reduced logistics, training, servicing costs, there will also be more UK content from an industrial perspective.
K9 and Archer would have been foreign orders with UK assembly, requiring bespoke parts for servicing and maintenance.
These users liked the author BB85 for the post:
new guy

Post Reply