Could this deal have been in the works when the Wedgetail conversions were decided (and went to the lowest bidder)? Or would that be overinterpreting
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Sure is "66 C130 is better than 4 E7"
but what I meant was that if there was a l-t contract within sight, building on the knowledgebase (and kit) in place (investments done), then that would compare almost like annuity income vs. a project where new entrants were pushing the pricing to break-even ( or loss making territory, once the a priori risks were priced in) - still requiring investment, for a one-off project
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)