CANADA

News and discussion threads on defence in other parts of the world.
abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2905
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by abc123 »

SKB wrote:Obelix, Dogmatix, Getafix, Vitalstatistix, Cacofonix, Geriatrix, Unhygienix.

Boromir class? Aragorn-class? Baggins-class? :crazy: :D :lol:
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1314
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: CANADA

Post by inch »

as ive just said in the Australian thread hope you guys are going to tell me the type 26 design has won in Canada also v soon :thumbup:

Frenchie
Member
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 Nov 2016, 15:01
France

Re: CANADA

Post by Frenchie »

Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Saab, Dassault and Airbus were all named Thursday to Canada’s official fighter jet supplier list, which allows them to receive information about plans to buy 88 jets and ultimately bid on the program.
https://www.defensenews.com/industry/20 ... mpetition/

It's premature, but dance of joy anyway :D

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Same line-up as in the Finnish competition, also to replace Hornets:
"The aircraft expected to be offered to Canada include Lockheed Martin’s F-35, Boeing’s Super Hornet, the Eurofighter Typhoon, the Dassault Rafale and Saab’s Gripen."
- just that for Canada Airbus seems to be leading for Typhoon; in Finland's case it is BAE
- timing difference about a year (Canada requesting proposals in 2019; Finland in April or May)
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Frenchie
Member
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 Nov 2016, 15:01
France

Re: CANADA

Post by Frenchie »

Thanks for the details ACC :thumbup:

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

I've lost track of the time scale it took for Virtus, from concept to fielding it, but in Canada's case they didn't find suitable offers in 2012, 2013 went better and fielding is taking place now (this summer). Shepherd keeps the details of the system behind paywall, but the start was reported in its day
"Canada requests new proposals for Integrated Soldier System

4th April 2013 - 14:30 GMT | by Jonathan Tringham in London
RSS

Canada has initiated a fresh round of proposals for an integrated soldier system after cancelling its 2012 solicitation due to a lack of suitable offers.

A formal request for proposals (RfP) has now been issued ..."
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by Timmymagic »

Lord Jim wrote:es or is the RCAF using the Asterix for?
Unless they've made a mistake in the copy it seems a little odd. Do the Canadian's have any remote radar stations or airbases that need fuel re-supply from time to time? If they do I would have thought commercial charter would have been cheaper.

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by R686 »

Timmymagic wrote:
Lord Jim wrote:es or is the RCAF using the Asterix for?
Unless they've made a mistake in the copy it seems a little odd. Do the Canadian's have any remote radar stations or airbases that need fuel re-supply from time to time? If they do I would have thought commercial charter would have been cheaper.
Can't remember is she ice strengthened?

Kiwis are doing it to there's to go down to Antarctica, I imagine the cunacks would have something similar in the north.

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by Timmymagic »

R686 wrote:Can't remember is she ice strengthened?
Not sure. But surely if she wasn't that would have made the rebuild even more ridiculously expensive? As it stands the entire project was barking mad, but sadly not a surprise in Canada's crazy world of defence procurement. For the cost of one Asterix they could have had 3 Tide Class...

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by R686 »

Timmymagic wrote:
R686 wrote:Can't remember is she ice strengthened?
Not sure. But surely if she wasn't that would have made the rebuild even more ridiculously expensive? As it stands the entire project was barking mad, but sadly not a surprise in Canada's crazy world of defence procurement. For the cost of one Asterix they could have had 3 Tide Class...
Couldn't agree more, the current government procrument policy is.........

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1314
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: CANADA

Post by inch »

cant be too long before we hear who won csc frigate contract I hope, and the Australian sea 5000 contract is also to be announced soon I think (may)?

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by R686 »

Behind a paywall, but seems AuGov might do all right out of the shit happening in US/CDA relations

http://www.australiandefence.com.au/new ... hornet-buy

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Boeing saying that anything is better than buying the "LM solution", from the above linked article:
"We have read reports that the Government of Canada is choosing to purchase used F/A-18 Classic Hornets from the Royal Australian Air Force in lieu of new Super Hornet fighter jets.

The Boeing Company respects the Canadian government’s decision and applauds the government’s continued use of a two engine fighter solution, which is a critical part of their northern Arctic border defence, NORAD cooperation, and coast to coast to coast security."
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by R686 »

Here's the breakdown of the additional Ex RAAF F/A18 Hornet deal.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/ ... m-18-to-25

certainty cover the NORAD questions on availability. they must really be pissed off as there would have been that many in the boneyard for parts and rebuild to a degree.


https://news.usni.org/2016/06/23/marine ... m-boneyard

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by R686 »

Well finally some movement into construction :clap: :clap: :clap:

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-nat ... -ship.html

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: CANADA

Post by SKB »


(Forces TV) 26th June 2018
The Royal Canadian Air Force has sent a contingent to the UK to perform public duties for Her Majesty The Queen. The personnel have now passed inspection at London's Wellington Barracks, meaning they have been given the green light to start guarding some of Britain's best-known landmarks.

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by R686 »

SKB wrote:
(Forces TV) 26th June 2018
The Royal Canadian Air Force has sent a contingent to the UK to perform public duties for Her Majesty The Queen. The personnel have now passed inspection at London's Wellington Barracks, meaning they have been given the green light to start guarding some of Britain's best-known landmarks.
Why?

Has any other nation done the same?

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by Lord Jim »

I believe Australia has provided ceremonial guards for some of the Royal palaces not too long ago. The Commonwealth is invited/asked to do so.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: CANADA

Post by SKB »

Because the Queen is the head of state in 16 Commonwealth Realms. Those guardsmen may not be British, but they are HER armed forces.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Canada regrets being classified as "a threat" and hits back with reverse-pork barrelling selective tariffs:
"Many of the U.S. products were chosen for their political rather than economic impact. For example, Canada imports just $3 million worth of yogurt from the U.S. annually and most of it comes from one plant in Wisconsin, the home state of House Speaker Paul Ryan. The product will now be hit with a 10 percent duty.

"This is a perfectly reciprocal action," Freeland said. "It is a dollar for dollar response."

Another product on the list is whiskey, which comes from Tennessee and Kentucky, the latter of which is the home state of Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trad ... -u-n887991

Will Norad survive in this tit-for-tat?
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
Halidon
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: 12 May 2015, 01:34
United States of America

Re: CANADA

Post by Halidon »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:Canada regrets being classified as "a threat" and hits back with reverse-pork barrelling selective tariffs:
"Many of the U.S. products were chosen for their political rather than economic impact. For example, Canada imports just $3 million worth of yogurt from the U.S. annually and most of it comes from one plant in Wisconsin, the home state of House Speaker Paul Ryan. The product will now be hit with a 10 percent duty.

"This is a perfectly reciprocal action," Freeland said. "It is a dollar for dollar response."

Another product on the list is whiskey, which comes from Tennessee and Kentucky, the latter of which is the home state of Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trad ... -u-n887991

Will Norad survive in this tit-for-tat?
He hasn't quite killed NATO yet, I think NORAD can pull itself across the Jan 20, 2020 finish line.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: CANADA

Post by SKB »


(Forces TV) 5th July 2018
The Royal Canadian Air Force are carrying out public duties in the UK for a month, including guarding landmarks around London. In preparation for their time in Britain, personnel have been given vocal training to ensure their voices are in top condition when giving commands.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Ohh- Canada:

"Last year [2017], Jean-Denis Fréchette, the parliamentary budget officer, estimated the CSC [frigate] program would cost $61.82 billion. He also warned that every year the awarding of the contract is delayed beyond 2018, taxpayers will spend an extra $3 billion because of inflation.

The surface combatant will be the backbone of the future Royal Canadian Navy.

In November in a surprise twist a French-Italian consortium declined to formally submit a bid and instead offered Canada a fleet of vessels at half the price.

Officials with Fincantieri of Italy and Naval Group of France said they don’t believe the procurement process as it is currently designed will be successful." -later in the article, as we know, it is said that the Gvmnt turned the proposal down

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/ne ... quirements
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

NickC
Donator
Posts: 1455
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by NickC »

Recent deadline passed for revised bids for Canadian Surface Combatant (CSC) Program, reported Navantia-Saab Team have submited their proposal to Irving Shipbuilding (Canadian Navy/MOD unusually delegated authority to shipyard Irving to pick the winner).

The team is proposing a solution based on the Navantia F105 frigate design, an upgraded Flight II version of the F100 Álvaro de Bazán-class frigates, the Cristóbal Colón (F-105) and the follow on Royal Australian Navy’s Hobart-class air-warfare destroyers and also basis of the GD BIW bid for the USN FFG(X).

Saab Australia will provide the 9LV CMS and the Australian CEA Technologies Active Phased Array Radar, assuming cut and paste variant of their losing bid for the Australian SEA5000 frigate contractwon by the BAE Type 26 Australian variant.

Presuming that the Navantia/Saab team did not use the new generation flat panel Saab Sea Giraffe 4A AESA GaN S- band and Sea Giraffe 1X band radars due to time and cost constraints of revised design for the CSC.

This follows the Canada's Combat Ship Team bid led by Lockheed Martin Canada based on the BAE Type 26
http://www.canadascombatshipteam.com/

Have seen no mention of third bidder Alion Canada, Damen and Atlas proposal.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1314
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: CANADA

Post by inch »

Any more news on the frigate programe yet.?

Post Reply