That is a misunderstanding of the 'ownership' of Boxer. It is split between KMW - Krauss-Maffei Wegmann and Rheinmetall. Generally speaking KMW are responsible for the hull and Rheinmetall the payload modules\turret. Please note the exact relationship is blurred due to work share agreements etc on particular projects. In the UK KMW through their subsidiary company WFEL are building 'half' and Rheinmetall through their subsidiary RBSL are also building 'half'. There are of course further subcontractors involved building components like Pearson.
Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
- These users liked the author tomuk for the post:
- RunningStrong
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
- These users liked the author SW1 for the post (total 2):
- Tempest414 • wargame_insomniac
-
- Member
- Posts: 415
- Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:54
- Has liked: 237 times
- Been liked: 24 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
"60 of the Future All-Terrain Vehicles (FATVs) from 2025 to replace its current fleet of Vikings and the older Bv 206"
All of them?
Does this mean 60x BvS10 (Mk3) replacing:
99 BvS-10 Mk2 and;
293 strong BV206 fleet
Is that it? In which case we're looking at a massive reduction!
For reference, in 2015 Defence News was reporting that the MoD had a requirement for 212 BvS206 replacement vehicles "for use in a supporting role to the Viking" (which itself was a fleet of 100 odd vehicles)!
https://www.defensenews.com/land/2015/0 ... r-marines/
All of them?
Does this mean 60x BvS10 (Mk3) replacing:
99 BvS-10 Mk2 and;
293 strong BV206 fleet
Is that it? In which case we're looking at a massive reduction!
For reference, in 2015 Defence News was reporting that the MoD had a requirement for 212 BvS206 replacement vehicles "for use in a supporting role to the Viking" (which itself was a fleet of 100 odd vehicles)!
https://www.defensenews.com/land/2015/0 ... r-marines/
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
Does seem a small number hopefully the initial batch. Wouldn’t mind seeing bvs10 adopted more widely across the light forces. Chinook liftable and used across complex terrain from the artic to the desert and everywhere in betweenjedibeeftrix wrote: ↑16 Dec 2022, 13:43 "60 of the Future All-Terrain Vehicles (FATVs) from 2025 to replace its current fleet of Vikings and the older Bv 206"
All of them?
Does this mean 60x BvS10 (Mk3) replacing:
99 BvS-10 Mk2 and;
293 strong BV206 fleet
Is that it? In which case we're looking at a massive reduction!
For reference, in 2015 Defence News was reporting that the MoD had a requirement for 212 BvS206 replacement vehicles "for use in a supporting role to the Viking" (which itself was a fleet of 100 odd vehicles)!
https://www.defensenews.com/land/2015/0 ... r-marines/
- These users liked the author SW1 for the post:
- jedibeeftrix
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52
- Has liked: 46 times
- Been liked: 56 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
Does UK still operate a BV206 fleet?jedibeeftrix wrote: ↑16 Dec 2022, 13:43 "60 of the Future All-Terrain Vehicles (FATVs) from 2025 to replace its current fleet of Vikings and the older Bv 206"
All of them?
Does this mean 60x BvS10 (Mk3) replacing:
99 BvS-10 Mk2 and;
293 strong BV206 fleet
Is that it? In which case we're looking at a massive reduction
Whilst it could be a cut, it could also be a plan to operate a split fleet of vehicles. Viking didn't get heavy work once Warthog entered service (and retired).
-
- Member
- Posts: 415
- Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:54
- Has liked: 237 times
- Been liked: 24 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
it had a requirement for 212 replacements vehicles in 2015. in UK procurement terms that probably means their soldiering on manfully despite their venerable age.RunningStrong wrote: ↑16 Dec 2022, 20:46Does UK still operate a BV206 fleet?jedibeeftrix wrote: ↑16 Dec 2022, 13:43 "60 of the Future All-Terrain Vehicles (FATVs) from 2025 to replace its current fleet of Vikings and the older Bv 206"
All of them?
Does this mean 60x BvS10 (Mk3) replacing:
99 BvS-10 Mk2 and;
293 strong BV206 fleet
Is that it? In which case we're looking at a massive reduction
Whilst it could be a cut, it could also be a plan to operate a split fleet of vehicles. Viking didn't get heavy work once Warthog entered service (and retired).
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
This states quite clearly the the 60 ATV's for the UK, are for the use of the UK Commando Force in the littoral response group.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/brit ... -agreement
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/brit ... -agreement
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7304
- Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
- Has liked: 325 times
- Been liked: 365 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
Looking at post further up steam it seems the new BVS10 Vikings are replacing the aging BV206s. Such a programme has been on the cards for a while as the BS10 ias a larger and more capable platform. As there will be the latest variant of the BS10 using them in the Littoral Response Groups makes sense but I do not think any of the current BVs10 fleet will be retiring.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52
- Has liked: 46 times
- Been liked: 56 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
I agree. We need to prioritise the replacement of FV432/CVR(T) and the most effective way of that is by progressing MRV-P part 2.Tempest414 wrote: ↑03 Jan 2023, 18:32 I am sure but where do we stop. As it has been said what could be done with the money lets take the funding for the extra 500 Boxers lets say this equals 2.1 Billion should we be looking to buy 200 Boxers , 300 BVs-10's and 700 Bushmasters for the same money
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4233
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
- Has liked: 94 times
- Been liked: 325 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
So just doing some simple sums from quick figures and based on the funding for 500 extra Boxers set at 2 billion
if we give Boxer a unit price in pounds of 4 million and BvS-10 a unit price of 1.5 million and then Bushmaster a unit price of 600,000 this could allow us to buy something like
200 Boxer = 800 million pounds ( total feet size 823 )
500 BvS-10 = 750 million pounds ( total fleet size 660)
800 Bushmaster = 480 million pounds ( total fleet size 800 )
Total cost 2.03 Billion
if we give Boxer a unit price in pounds of 4 million and BvS-10 a unit price of 1.5 million and then Bushmaster a unit price of 600,000 this could allow us to buy something like
200 Boxer = 800 million pounds ( total feet size 823 )
500 BvS-10 = 750 million pounds ( total fleet size 660)
800 Bushmaster = 480 million pounds ( total fleet size 800 )
Total cost 2.03 Billion
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52
- Has liked: 46 times
- Been liked: 56 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
To replace 880 Bulldog vehicles, 218 Husky, 99 Viking, Pinz (<100?).Tempest414 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2023, 12:03 So just doing some simple sums from quick figures and based on the funding for 500 extra Boxers set at 2 billion
if we give Boxer a unit price in pounds of 4 million and BvS-10 a unit price of 1.5 million and then Bushmaster a unit price of 600,000 this could allow us to buy something like
200 Boxer = 800 million pounds ( total feet size 823 )
500 BvS-10 = 750 million pounds ( total fleet size 660)
800 Bushmaster = 480 million pounds ( total fleet size 800 )
Total cost 2.03 Billion
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
I am not sure how do you get these numbers but this is serious underestimation of the costs for Bushmasters. Wikipedia is using article published in sunrise from last year as a source for vehicle price, which is listed at AUD2.45 million per unit (£1.4 million). Two years ago, in 2020, New Zealand bought 43 Bushmasters for NZD102.9 million ($67 million). I am not sure what was rate than but today it would mean £54 million total or £1.25 million per unit. So £600,000 per vehicle looks unrealistic and price per unit would be almost double that amount.Tempest414 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2023, 12:03 ... Bushmaster a unit price of 600,000 ....
800 Bushmaster = 480 million pounds ( total fleet size 800 )
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4233
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
- Has liked: 94 times
- Been liked: 325 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
OK lets play with those figures and keeping the 4 million per Boxer 500 would = 2 billion pound so it could brake it down like sosol wrote: ↑04 Jan 2023, 15:09I am not sure how do you get these numbers but this is serious underestimation of the costs for Bushmasters. Wikipedia is using article published in sunrise from last year as a source for vehicle price, which is listed at AUD2.45 million per unit (£1.4 million). Two years ago, in 2020, New Zealand bought 43 Bushmasters for NZD102.9 million ($67 million). I am not sure what was rate than but today it would mean £54 million total or £1.25 million per unit. So £600,000 per vehicle looks unrealistic and price per unit would be almost double that amount.Tempest414 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2023, 12:03 ... Bushmaster a unit price of 600,000 ....
800 Bushmaster = 480 million pounds ( total fleet size 800 )
150 Boxers @ 4 million each = 600 million
500 BvS-10 @ 1.5 million each = 750 million
500 Bushmaster @ 1.4 million each = 700 million
The other option could be a buy of
175 Boxer = 700 million
1200 Patria 6x6 = 1.3 billion
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4233
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
- Has liked: 94 times
- Been liked: 325 times
Re: Multi Role Vehicle – Protected - MRV(P)
All very good but these vehicles are getting on for 20 years old now for me we need to move on Keep Jackal and Foxhound and replace Mastiff with 600 Prtria 6x6 at the same time start design of a UK replacement for Jackal & Foxhound with a 1200 vehicle order to start in 2030