Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Tempest414 wrote:
donald_of_tokyo wrote:Looking at these image, I really think MHC must adopt bulky hull. Large deck space, more flexibility to future MCM drones. I think we must omit "high speed" requirement, which will significantly degrade the effectiveness as MHC ship, by requiring more slender hull. I think, 18 knot is max. Even 16 knots is doable.
So lets say the UK went for a 100 meter Venari with a wildcat capable hangar and Max speed of 18 knots it could still be very a useful patrol ship
Exactly :thumbup:

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 3958
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Tempest414 wrote:
donald_of_tokyo wrote:Looking at these image, I really think MHC must adopt bulky hull. Large deck space, more flexibility to future MCM drones. I think we must omit "high speed" requirement, which will significantly degrade the effectiveness as MHC ship, by requiring more slender hull. I think, 18 knot is max. Even 16 knots is doable.
So lets say the UK went for a 100 meter Venari with a wildcat capable hangar and Max speed of 18 knots it could still be very a useful patrol ship
The speed requirement is up for debate, I would like to see 21knts but the crucial part is the hanger.

A Venari 95 with a 57mm/76mm, Phalanx and embarked Wildcat would be a very very useful platform in the maritime security role. The ability to embark CB90's, LCVP's and LCAC's is just the icing on the cake.

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Poiuytrewq wrote:The speed requirement is up for debate, I would like to see 21knts but the crucial part is the hanger.

A Venari 95 with a 57mm/76mm, Phalanx and embarked Wildcat would be a very very useful platform in the maritime security role. The ability to embark CB90's, LCVP's and LCAC's is just the icing on the cake.
MHC is primarily a mine counter measure asset. It must be evaluated as such. Patrol is primarily T31 and River B2s role. For example, I am not sure BOTH ciws and 57/76mm are needed. Either might be better, in view of less crew and more deployment. May be, FFBNW CIWS?

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 3958
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

donald_of_tokyo wrote:
Poiuytrewq wrote:The speed requirement is up for debate, I would like to see 21knts but the crucial part is the hanger.

A Venari 95 with a 57mm/76mm, Phalanx and embarked Wildcat would be a very very useful platform in the maritime security role. The ability to embark CB90's, LCVP's and LCAC's is just the icing on the cake.
MHC is primarily a mine counter measure asset. It must be evaluated as such. Patrol is primarily T31 and River B2s role. For example, I am not sure BOTH ciws and 57/76mm are needed. Either might be better, in view of less crew and more deployment. May be, FFBNW CIWS?
Apologies Donald, my fault for not being clear (again). The CIWS should be FFBNW along with the Wildcat. Some would argue that for a lot of patrol tasks even the 57mm/76mm is unnecessary but I believe a 57mm/76mm and 2x 30mm's is a basic requirement for patrolling outside the EEZ. The Phalanx and Wildcat can be added if necessary.

My comment above was based on a Black Sea deployment in the current climate. A Venari 95 with a 57mm/76mm, 2x 30mm's, Phalanx and a Wildcat would be a decent platform to send into such a situation. Sending a pair of Venari 95's with maybe a single Wildcat between them would be even better, especially if one was in a Combat MCMV configuration with 12 CAMM and Artisan.

We have to be realistic, these sort of standoff confrontations are going to become more and more common until one side backs down, and there is little sign of that. The days of trotting the globe with a 20mm or 30mm are coming to an end and RN/MOD/HMG need to realise that before a vessel gets into a situation it can't handle.

The Venari will never be an offensive asset but it should have the ability to upgrade its defensive capabilities if required. The Combat MCMV configuration is just an even more capable defensive package that can operate in conflict zones without additional escorts. Some argue that it isn't necessary because a T23/T26/T31 will always be on hand to escort the MCMV's. In that case what is going to escort Echo in the Black Sea? The answer is probably nothing hence the need for the new class of MHC vessels to be able to quickly upgrade their defensive cability if required.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by SKB »



The Enterprise is patrolling near the Neutral Zone....

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by SKB »



....and has arrived back at Spacedock.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by SKB »



It would be unwise of the ship's company to go ashore wearing red shirts in this strange, hostile alien location.... :mrgreen:

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by SKB »


Image

Enterprise's shields have been raised. :mrgreen:

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by SKB »



And left the next day.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by SKB »


(Forces TV) 15th August 2019
Following 22 months away from her home port HMS Echo returned to Devonport today. The Royal Navy survey ship has been working with NATO and the EU in the Mediterranean and Black Sea as well as charting the region’s waterways.

User avatar
Jensy
Senior Member
Posts: 1061
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by Jensy »

Royal Navy to deploy HMS Enterprise to Beirut


"Defence Secretary said: "At the request of the Lebanese government I have today authorised the sending of HMS Enterprise to help survey the Port of Beirut, assessing the damage and supporting the Lebanese government and people rebuild this vital piece of national infrastructure."
Rather fortunately she's currently in Cyprus so very close by. I'd expect her hydrographic capabilities will be of great use in trying to get Beirut harbour functioning again.

Anyone know how many containers she can embark?

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by SKB »


(Forces TV) 10th August 2020
Royal Navy ship HMS Enterprise has arrived in Beirut to assist following an explosion which destroyed the port and buildings across the city. The survey vessel will carry out work to establish the extent of the damage, following last Tuesday's incident which killed hundreds and injured thousands more. She has also brought with her tents, cots and field kitchen systems.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by SKB »

Enterprise returns home
Image
(NavyLookout) 15th October 2020
Welcome home HMS Enterprise. Back in Plymouth Sound today after 15 months away on a global deployment covering 53,000 nautical miles.

:mrgreen:

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by bobp »

looks like she needs a lick of grey paint.

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by Lord Jim »

She has been worked very hard so probably need more than a coat of paint.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

What's often overlooked is that should other MCM sqdrns (not a formal term?) be activated, these two ships can take on the command role and have lots of relevant kit
- hopefully both will stay in line as replacements are far off
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

"HMS Echo reduced to low readiness as Royal Navy considers options for replacement capability"

Clearly showing how tight the current RN resources are.

https://www.navylookout.com/hms-echo-re ... apability/
These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post (total 2):
PoiuytrewqJensy

User avatar
Jensy
Senior Member
Posts: 1061
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by Jensy »

donald_of_tokyo wrote: 05 May 2022, 13:01 "HMS Echo reduced to low readiness as Royal Navy considers options for replacement capability"

Clearly showing how tight the current RN resources are.

https://www.navylookout.com/hms-echo-re ... apability/
Being very generous, could it be suggested that with the decline of the Sandowns and Hunts that there's a reduced requirement for an MCM mothership?

Otherwise seems an odd decision considering the current state of the world and then importance of keeping sea lanes open.

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Jensy wrote: 06 May 2022, 00:49
donald_of_tokyo wrote: 05 May 2022, 13:01 "HMS Echo reduced to low readiness as Royal Navy considers options for replacement capability"

Clearly showing how tight the current RN resources are.

https://www.navylookout.com/hms-echo-re ... apability/
Being very generous, could it be suggested that with the decline of the Sandowns and Hunts that there's a reduced requirement for an MCM mothership?

Otherwise seems an odd decision considering the current state of the world and then importance of keeping sea lanes open.
Not sure, but I think it simply means lack of resource. HMS Echo going into reserve is bad thing, but as it is coincident with all 5 River B2 being operational/deployed, it is just "plus" and "minus", not only negative move.

On MCM mother ship: I understand Sandowns will go away without replacement, while Hunts will be replaced with MCM motherships. This could be (at least partly) justified because MCM USV kits are stated to be operatable from land for a hundred km or so, which means ALL coastal operations and MANY IF the choke-point operations can be covered from land. If this move can provide crew for HMS Echo, then it is not a negative move, either.

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

HMS Scott has just extended her life. HMS Echo went into extended readiness status, an her parts will be used to support HMS Enterprise.

May be, not chance coincidence.

Stopping Scott from going out just made Echo into extended readiness status?





https://www.navylookout.com/hms-echo-re ... apability/

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by wargame_insomniac »

More RN robbing Peter to pay Paul.

I am glad that Scott back in active service- I imagine it will be invaluable in surveying and protecting the undersea cables, especially as that is supposedly a big part of our strategy in the High North.

Just a shame that its instead of the other survey work that Echo carry out.

RN crew retention and recruitment needs to be increased in priority with extra funding.
These users liked the author wargame_insomniac for the post (total 2):
donald_of_tokyoRepulse

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4583
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Utter disgrace

These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 2):
donald_of_tokyoJensy
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

GarethDavies1
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: 26 May 2021, 11:45
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by GarethDavies1 »

Yes total disgrace...this Government is destroying our armed forces.

jimthelad
Member
Posts: 507
Joined: 14 May 2015, 20:16
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by jimthelad »

No crew and the need to crew Scott for deep sea operations make it inevitable.

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Echo Class Hydrographic Survey Ships (RN)

Post by wargame_insomniac »

jimthelad wrote: 01 Jul 2022, 22:50 No crew and the need to crew Scott for deep sea operations make it inevitable.
The sad thing is that we would probably need these ships more than ever. I know they are n't frontline vessels but I would have thought surveying and monitoring deep sea in North Atlantic and High North is crucial with increasing tensions with Russia, specifically the submersible threat to undersea cables.

Post Reply