Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

... ENTERPRISE is following in its sister ship's footsteps by being decommissioned at the end of this month.

What a hell is going on... Lack of man power, presumably?

It was a big question from where the crew for the 2 OSV's recently procured will be provided, MROSS(1) and MCM-OSV. I am much more getting confident that "lack of man-power" is the major issue for RN.

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4579
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Repulse »

But both of those are going to be RFA manned. If you add onto this the crew being released from the MCMs and also the fact we are down on escorts, something doesn’t quite add up overall.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Repulse wrote: 07 Mar 2023, 14:14 But both of those are going to be RFA manned. If you add onto this the crew being released from the MCMs and also the fact we are down on escorts, something doesn’t quite add up overall.
I also thought that the 2 OSVs will required RFA crew. However, we all know there is NOT redundant RFA crew.

In near future, the 3 FSSS to come will eat the crew of Fort Victoria, Argus, and one more vessel. This "one more" will be "one of the 3 Bays, 4 Tides, and 3 FSSS in rotation for long maintenance", I guess. If we want to keep Argus until MRSS comes, "2 vessels out of 11 in long maintenance" will be needed (might be acceptable).

But, anyway, there is no crew for the 2 OSVs.

As RFA vessels are all mix-crewed with RFA and RN members, I "guess" some flexibility may exists. Thus, I thought the crew of HMS Enterprise will "eventually" fill the 2 OSVs. Just an assumption.

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1409
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by tomuk »

That maybe the case and you would think the crew of a survey vessel would have the sort of skills required to do underwater surveying just maybe not the need for a 20mm and grey funnel in home waters.

In terms of overall manpower levels the split between RN and RFA is not fixed and the Navy could move budget from RN to RFA personnel if it wanted to.

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Interesting comparison of current MCMVs and (presumably) MCM USVs.


Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 3954
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post (total 2):
donald_of_tokyojedibeeftrix

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 3954
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Mind the gap!


User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5550
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Tempest414 »

The 9 meter X could even be deployed from a RB2

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4579
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Repulse »

Poiuytrewq wrote: 30 Mar 2023, 16:33 Mind the gap!
Might need a bigger drone to cover what HMS Enterprise did in evacuating nationals during the Libyan conflict…
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4579
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Repulse »

These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 2):
Ron5wargame_insomniac
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by wargame_insomniac »

Saw on thir twitter feed that remaining blue and white colour rather than RN grey.

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1183
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by new guy »

from my understanding,
The MHC programme is procuring up to 6 Mine Countermeasures (MCM) Maritime Autonomous Mission Systems (MAS), up to 4 MCM (LSV) and a UK MCM (OSV, Stirling castle), STUFT . The Mission Systems and LSVs will deliver a global MCM effect, while the OSV will enable UK offshore operations. The programme will replace the Hunt and Sandown Class MCMVs. The Mission Systems can be deployed by air, land and sea and will eventually be capability of operating from a number of RN, RFA or suitable commercial vessels; including T26 and future ships.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... o_2032.pdf

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

new guy wrote: 23 Apr 2023, 19:52 from my understanding,
The MHC programme is procuring up to 6 Mine Countermeasures (MCM) Maritime Autonomous Mission Systems (MAS), up to 4 MCM (LSV) and a UK MCM (OSV, Stirling castle), STUFT . The Mission Systems and LSVs will deliver a global MCM effect, while the OSV will enable UK offshore operations. The programme will replace the Hunt and Sandown Class MCMVs. The Mission Systems can be deployed by air, land and sea and will eventually be capability of operating from a number of RN, RFA or suitable commercial vessels; including T26 and future ships.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... o_2032.pdf
Good summary. One thing to add is MHC block-1, which is totally missing from this list.

MHC block-1 delivers,
- 3 Mine Hunting MCM USV systems: 2 at Stirling, 1 at Persian Gulf (including 2 Atlas-UK ARCIMS USVs)
- 3 Mine Sweeping MCM USV systems: 3 influence sweep kits, with 3 Atlas-UK ARCIMS USVs.
There are 5 Atlas-UK ARCIMS USVs ordered/delivered. The list requires 6 hulls, and I guess it is Thales USV? (not sure).

Good thing is, UK already has / in initial operation phase of 5 Atlas-UK ARCIMS USVs.

And another 6 systems (and LSV/OSVs) are coming in MHC block-2, as you summarized.
These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post:
new guy

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Report on the first ACRIMS USV deployed to the Gulf, on board RFA Cardigan Bay.

These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post:
new guy

User avatar
Jensy
Senior Member
Posts: 1061
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Jensy »

donald_of_tokyo wrote: 24 Apr 2023, 03:10 Report on the first ACRIMS USV deployed to the Gulf, on board RFA Cardigan Bay.

According to The Times she's headed for Port Sudan to assist in the evacuation.

Curious what will happen to the MHC gear.

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1183
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by new guy »

Jensy wrote: 25 Apr 2023, 01:24
donald_of_tokyo wrote: 24 Apr 2023, 03:10 Report on the first ACRIMS USV deployed to the Gulf, on board RFA Cardigan Bay.

According to The Times she's headed for Port Sudan to assist in the evacuation.

Curious what will happen to the MHC gear.
Nope. Cardigan bay is in maintenance right now. Miss leading like the story on PoW. Only RAF will be able to do the evacuation.
These users liked the author new guy for the post:
Jensy

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5550
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Tempest414 »

new guy wrote: 25 Apr 2023, 16:23
Jensy wrote: 25 Apr 2023, 01:24
donald_of_tokyo wrote: 24 Apr 2023, 03:10 Report on the first ACRIMS USV deployed to the Gulf, on board RFA Cardigan Bay.

According to The Times she's headed for Port Sudan to assist in the evacuation.

Curious what will happen to the MHC gear.
Nope. Cardigan bay is in maintenance right now. Miss leading like the story on PoW. Only RAF will be able to do the evacuation.
Ben Wallace said last night that the EoS type 23 would be going along side in Port Sudan Today and that the Gulf based Bay was making her way to the Red Sea to standby for HADR ops if needed

Also a Point class is in the Red Sea now
These users liked the author Tempest414 for the post:
new guy

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1183
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by new guy »

Tempest414 wrote: 26 Apr 2023, 11:34
new guy wrote: 25 Apr 2023, 16:23
Jensy wrote: 25 Apr 2023, 01:24
donald_of_tokyo wrote: 24 Apr 2023, 03:10 Report on the first ACRIMS USV deployed to the Gulf, on board RFA Cardigan Bay.

According to The Times she's headed for Port Sudan to assist in the evacuation.

Curious what will happen to the MHC gear.
Nope. Cardigan bay is in maintenance right now. Miss leading like the story on PoW. Only RAF will be able to do the evacuation.
Ben Wallace said last night that the EoS type 23 would be going along side in Port Sudan Today and that the Gulf based Bay was making her way to the Red Sea to standby for HADR ops if needed

Also a Point class is in the Red Sea now
Thanks. I heard that the bay was in maintenance in Duqm. I meant that i did not see 1 T23 as a effective evacuation platform for the whole evacuation (Quite obvious) of 4,000 people. However, with just the one T23 it would be perhaps effective for a few people not based in Khartoum. Now with the fact of a point class and the bay it seems effective for potentially a few hundred.

Online
User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7930
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by SKB »


These users liked the author SKB for the post:
wargame_insomniac

Online
User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7930
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by SKB »


User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5550
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by Tempest414 »

So maybe 15 of these built by Babcocks to replace the OPV's , MRoSS and LSV's

These users liked the author Tempest414 for the post:
Jake1992

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1183
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by new guy »

Tempest414 wrote: 10 Sep 2023, 11:08 So maybe 15 of these built by Babcocks to replace the OPV's , MRoSS and LSV's

As mentioned in the actual video, that is a placeholder design until the consortium finishes theirs.

I think a militarised/faster / more OPV version of this would be good:
https://www.kongsberg.com/maritime/ship ... el-design/

25 core crew, 50 common complement ( 25 Mission specialists) total capacity for 100 ( 50 EMF). (So like the RB2).
1 merlin flight deck+hanger for 2 ( width is big enough)
2 spots aft and forward for 20mm, 30mm, 40mm.
We need 12 MCMV for the NATOMCMG1&2, home, kipion, black and baltic sea requirements.
The UK gov will probably want greater international presence, and we can't really afford frigates for that, so lets say + 10 OPV's instead of just 5 (RB1 rep) for the roll of 'Global Patrol Vessel'.
. + some extra for MROSS,
+ some for a Logistics / multi-role / tender / maintence ship role.
12-10-2-6?
£100m each?

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by wargame_insomniac »

donald_of_tokyo wrote: 24 Apr 2023, 02:46
new guy wrote: 23 Apr 2023, 19:52 from my understanding,
The MHC programme is procuring up to 6 Mine Countermeasures (MCM) Maritime Autonomous Mission Systems (MAS), up to 4 MCM (LSV) and a UK MCM (OSV, Stirling castle), STUFT . The Mission Systems and LSVs will deliver a global MCM effect, while the OSV will enable UK offshore operations. The programme will replace the Hunt and Sandown Class MCMVs. The Mission Systems can be deployed by air, land and sea and will eventually be capability of operating from a number of RN, RFA or suitable commercial vessels; including T26 and future ships.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... o_2032.pdf
Good summary. One thing to add is MHC block-1, which is totally missing from this list.

MHC block-1 delivers,
- 3 Mine Hunting MCM USV systems: 2 at Stirling, 1 at Persian Gulf (including 2 Atlas-UK ARCIMS USVs)
- 3 Mine Sweeping MCM USV systems: 3 influence sweep kits, with 3 Atlas-UK ARCIMS USVs.
There are 5 Atlas-UK ARCIMS USVs ordered/delivered. The list requires 6 hulls, and I guess it is Thales USV? (not sure).

Good thing is, UK already has / in initial operation phase of 5 Atlas-UK ARCIMS USVs.

And another 6 systems (and LSV/OSVs) are coming in MHC block-2, as you summarized.
Saw a thread on X or formerly Twitter, showing pictures of each of these systems in operation or testing at sea, with initial post and 17 replis with loads of pictures:

These users liked the author wargame_insomniac for the post:
donald_of_tokyo

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Mine countermeasures and Hydrographic capability (MHC) (MHPC)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Nice movie.


Post Reply