F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Early days talk (repeated on some renderings) while the Norwegian competition was still running.
- Just to fit two, JSM is slimmer (and longer) than the base missile (NSM).
- Just to fit two, JSM is slimmer (and longer) than the base missile (NSM).
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
I'm trying to find the US contract for Block 4 sheduleArmChairCivvy wrote: ↑03 Mar 2022, 06:31It's good to have a 'sovereign' backup when you have put yourself into a position when others make the decisions for you
- clawing back that 'backup' in the form of Tempest (switching one level up; at the a/c level) will cost a pretty penny... but I'm still all for it
I've stopped following what the JPO says (bcz it is not a grea indicator for what will actually happen). On that note, the latest F-35 deal (6o for Finland) was announced with the blurb that deliveries starting in 2025 will come with cruise missiles 'attached'. I just wonder which one will have been integrated?
- even zee Germans will be flashing the cash to have some free-fall! nukes attached to theirs; at least the integration is there
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
1) - I'd gladly see a UK developed cheaper munition see service, but we've had years to do so and seem to have failed. I hope Spear goes down that route as part of its spiral developments. As a family of munitions it holds real promise, but only if we really commit to it.
But if you could point out a UK built air launched anti-ship missile or UK built air launched mine system, none of which we have in our armoury at present I'd be grateful...ideally one that could be integrated across F-35, Typhoon and P-8 cheaply and easily though...that's why I'm advocating for this...
2) - It has a fuse that is designed to detonate under a ship...if you really want to sink a ship you put a large hole in it with a torpedo...or break its back. Fusing on current precision munitions that we possess is rather sub-optimal for the task.
3) - If you're past the early days of a war when an enemy's AD system is degraded why keep on lobbing hugely expensive munitions when others will do the same job....and PWIV is only 500lb...we could do with some larger munitions...JDAM will fit on F-35 and P-8 in a 1,000lb guise...
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
So it is a buy American cause it’s cheaper post. Well paveway IV isn’t expensive for an all weather multi programmable weapon. I would like to know exactly how much this JDAM is for customers outside of the US with the laser nose kit and all, is it the US simply catching up with we’re paveway IV has been for years?. As paveway IV is on both UK F35, typhoon and protector and part of spear 1 development it covers the requirement, if memory severs I think the RAF used it to sink a boat in Libya. If the past few years has taught us anything it is national resilience in expendables and I think munitions fall into that category of vaccines and ppe, you can rely on no one but yourself when everyone needs them what price to you put on outsourcing it?Timmymagic wrote: ↑04 Mar 2022, 11:081) - I'd gladly see a UK developed cheaper munition see service, but we've had years to do so and seem to have failed. I hope Spear goes down that route as part of its spiral developments. As a family of munitions it holds real promise, but only if we really commit to it.
But if you could point out a UK built air launched anti-ship missile or UK built air launched mine system, none of which we have in our armoury at present I'd be grateful...ideally one that could be integrated across F-35, Typhoon and P-8 cheaply and easily though...that's why I'm advocating for this...
2) - It has a fuse that is designed to detonate under a ship...if you really want to sink a ship you put a large hole in it with a torpedo...or break its back. Fusing on current precision munitions that we possess is rather sub-optimal for the task.
3) - If you're past the early days of a war when an enemy's AD system is degraded why keep on lobbing hugely expensive munitions when others will do the same job....and PWIV is only 500lb...we could do with some larger munitions...JDAM will fit on F-35 and P-8 in a 1,000lb guise...
The UK doesn’t have an air launched anti ship missile because the requirement was retired with tornado and sea eagle. The requirement now sits with the RN and there blue water capability is principal SNN based and littoral is lynx based with sea venom. There’s nothing on p8 because there is beardy any money to run it as is left alone look at weapons integration the folly of buy American.
They keep lobbying paveway and the like because of the legal targeting requirements and a worry of civilian casualties when shooting at things, paveway IV has supposedly a penetrating warhead and of course stormshadow for very hardened targets.
Your probably looking to put these things increasingly on unmanned systems from hear on hence why protector and mosquito will imo have an ever increasing importance especially after the current conflict.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
RAF F35s have joined Typhoons on NATO patrols flying from RAF Marham, Coningsby and Akrotiri with Tankers from Brize Norton
https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/ra ... o-mission/
https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/ra ... o-mission/
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Less chance of the F35B being available on @HMSPWLS / @HMSQNLZ for any deployment soon then. We need more F35B so that can be used more easily by both RN & RAF.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
It is important that the F-35s are operating from RAF Marham rather then being forward deployed. That does give the squadron more flexibility on taskings even if it means longer duration sorties.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
When was the last confirmed delivery of new F-35B to Marham and how many?
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
that was what I was thinking but had a quick look and it said Feb must have looked in the wrong place thanks
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
In case you miss it in the German Armed Forces thread...
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ge ... 022-03-14/
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ge ... 022-03-14/
- These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post:
- Jensy
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/ra ... -exercise/
Royal Air Force F-35B Lightning fighter jets and Maritime Reconnaissance Aircraft are participating in Exercise Cold Response. This month-long exercise for land, sea and air forces trains over 30,000 troops from 27 nations to operate together in the largest cold weather exercise since the 1980s.
Royal Air Force F-35B Lightning fighter jets and Maritime Reconnaissance Aircraft are participating in Exercise Cold Response. This month-long exercise for land, sea and air forces trains over 30,000 troops from 27 nations to operate together in the largest cold weather exercise since the 1980s.
- These users liked the author SW1 for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
So the RAF F-35B will be training with but not operating from HMS Prince of Wales.....SW1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2022, 14:01 https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/ra ... -exercise/
Royal Air Force F-35B Lightning fighter jets and Maritime Reconnaissance Aircraft are participating in Exercise Cold Response. This month-long exercise for land, sea and air forces trains over 30,000 troops from 27 nations to operate together in the largest cold weather exercise since the 1980s.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Both of which should be FAA assets.
- These users liked the author Scimitar54 for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Some good news...likely another 26 F-35B heading our way after 2025.
- These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post (total 2):
- serge750 • wargame_insomniac
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Enough to fill 2 carriers at least (just).
Part of me feels we shouldn't be giving Lockheed Martin any more money till we start getting our weapons integrated at something better than the current speed that can only be measure with wind erosion, 2027 for Meteor or worse "no definitive date" just isn't good enough.
Part of me feels we shouldn't be giving Lockheed Martin any more money till we start getting our weapons integrated at something better than the current speed that can only be measure with wind erosion, 2027 for Meteor or worse "no definitive date" just isn't good enough.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
To be honest it was looking for a while as if the final total would be 48 or 60, so 74 is a bit of a result. Hopefully, we can find some money as well to replace the lost airframe and add a few attrition reserves. Might even mean we could just about stand up a 4th squadron...5 x Sqn's of 12 is 60 aircraft...(obviously including an OCU). Just another 4-5 could potentially mean enough to do that and all the maintenance requirements.Jdam wrote: ↑26 Apr 2022, 15:15 Enough to fill 2 carriers at least (just).
Part of me feels we shouldn't be giving Lockheed Martin any more money till we start getting our weapons integrated at something better than the current speed that can only be measure with wind erosion, 2027 for Meteor or worse "no definitive date" just isn't good enough.
A potential bit of good news is that these 26 will be from Lot 17 onwards. Thats the full fat Block IV model with all the new EW enhancements. That could also mean the RAF is likely to fund an upgrade of all of the existing fleet to that same standard to avoid the 'Fleet within Fleets' problem that has blighted other programmes. Lot 17 is when the F-35 really starts to exceed its promise...
- These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2022/04 ... -complete/
In Monday’s report, GAO found that the cost of the F-35′s Block 4 modernization effort grew to $15.1 billion in 2021, $741 million more than the estimated cost in 2020.
Much of that increase was due to a $330 million increase in the estimated cost of the Technology Refresh 3 effort, an upgrade to the F-35′s hardware and software that seeks to improve its processing capability, display units and increased memory, GAO said. The development of Tech Refresh 3 has proven to be more complicated than expected, program officials told GAO, and has driven up the price tag.
Another $312 million in cost increases came from modernizing aging test aircraft supporting weapons development, as well as other testing and lab upgrades, the report found. Operational test and evaluation officials told GAO more flight test capacity is needed to ensure several Block 4 capabilities, including weapons integration, work properly.
Multiple problems with software, funding issues that halted software development for eight months in 2021, and the addition of new capabilities has also delayed the delivery of final Block 4 capabilities to 2029, three years later than originally expected.
Lockheed Martin, which builds the F-35, and program officials took several steps to improve its software development, including increased lab testing of software, improved and more consistent monitoring of software development, and lengthening the schedule for developing Block 4 software “drops” from six to 12 months, beginning in 2022.
In Monday’s report, GAO found that the cost of the F-35′s Block 4 modernization effort grew to $15.1 billion in 2021, $741 million more than the estimated cost in 2020.
Much of that increase was due to a $330 million increase in the estimated cost of the Technology Refresh 3 effort, an upgrade to the F-35′s hardware and software that seeks to improve its processing capability, display units and increased memory, GAO said. The development of Tech Refresh 3 has proven to be more complicated than expected, program officials told GAO, and has driven up the price tag.
Another $312 million in cost increases came from modernizing aging test aircraft supporting weapons development, as well as other testing and lab upgrades, the report found. Operational test and evaluation officials told GAO more flight test capacity is needed to ensure several Block 4 capabilities, including weapons integration, work properly.
Multiple problems with software, funding issues that halted software development for eight months in 2021, and the addition of new capabilities has also delayed the delivery of final Block 4 capabilities to 2029, three years later than originally expected.
Lockheed Martin, which builds the F-35, and program officials took several steps to improve its software development, including increased lab testing of software, improved and more consistent monitoring of software development, and lengthening the schedule for developing Block 4 software “drops” from six to 12 months, beginning in 2022.