Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5556
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
The old what happens when the next missile comes along can be levelled at very ship that sails the seas
Any way type 31 be OK and will deploy over seas with 24 CAMM and 8 NSM
Any way type 31 be OK and will deploy over seas with 24 CAMM and 8 NSM
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Both sides have never said the number of CAMM to be fitted has been agreed. The data link and missile controllers fitted will certainly support more than 12 missiles.Ron5 wrote: ↑21 Jan 2023, 15:00An interesting comment that prompted a couple of thoughts.pko100 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2023, 23:45 There is a planned programme for each ship to have capability inserted after they are accepted off contract. That will be mte plus any equipment rotated off decommissioned Type 23s. Increasing CAMM load to 24 does not materially increase the cost of the ship.
I think the thought of 32 mk 41 and nsm being fitted any time soon is very unlikely. In the late 20s, the navy will be funding SV-CAMM and Sea Viper SVE as well as trying to find headroom for type 32. FC?/ASW will also be costing a lot in that time frame and if nsm is fitted to other platforms, I expect it will go to the Type 26s.
Following on from the Ukraine war, if any additional money is found for defence, I expect the lions share will go to the army to close the existing horrendous capability gaps in artillery, gbad, ifvs and ammunition holdings etc.
Firstly, if additional CAMM cells are so cheap, why wasn't the base contract specified with 24, 36 or 48 cells?
Secondly, obviously, the MoD is going to be very short of money, inflation will continue, and the army will have its wishlist raised in priority. So what will save the plan to upgrade the T31's before service entry? Hard to see Wallace putting the cost of fitting extra missiles etc on a patrol frigate ahead of new artillery/missiles/tanks/Boxers for the army.
That's even assuming the T31's will come in on budget.
I think the Navy have been caught in a difficult place over perceived value for money viz 1 Type 26 = 3 to 4 Type 31s, so have been keen not to over sell the capabilities offered by the Type 31 to protect the order of the final 5 type 26s. From previous experience, it was difficult to argue the case for Astute if the navy thought the U class offered an acceptable level of capability, hence the Us were quickly sold to Canada (in exchange for use of Canadian land for the Army exercise ranges).
Now that has been confirmed, the Navy have more scope to up arm the type 31 but I think the general state of the economy and the lessons that need to be learnt from Ukraine will seriously limit the Navy getting any additional funding in the next few years.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3959
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Simply that the original design that the T31 is derived from included up to 16x Harpoon in canisters.
Clearly the space that is available is generous and possibly more than 16x NSM could be added if required in a conflict scenario.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5545
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
There are several threats on which these (new generation) guns can handle better than AA-missile.Repulse wrote: ↑21 Jan 2023, 18:53You’d need to let them get damn close to make any of that have a hope in hell to hit / deflect anything…donald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑21 Jan 2023, 16:17 No problem, T31 has a 57mm gun which can fire 3P ammo and even guided ammo, 2x 40mm gun with 3P ammo. It also has a state of the art ESM/ECM and decoy launcher
If they are that crap, best use them close to home under a layered defence.
1: cheap and numerous "suicide drones"
2: fast-boat swarm, especially in "the first day" when it is still gray and ORE is strict, and RAF's Typhoon fighters cannot use Brimstone in number.
Especially for item-1, French FREMM can handle only up to 16 with its Aster-15, and has only one 76 mm gun (and 20mm guns), while T31 has one 57mm and two 40mm guns, which is better I think.
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
The US Navy trials with the 57mm guns firing the 3P Mk295 rounds on their LCS ships against small craft in the swarm scenario were said to be ineffective, the problem with the gun was the lightweight 3P airburst munition for the gun, it generated a lot of shrapnel (seen quoted as 8,0000 light fragments) which can kill unprotected crew but had little actual stopping power on a boat.donald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 02:17There are several threats on which these (new generation) guns can handle better than AA-missile.Repulse wrote: ↑21 Jan 2023, 18:53You’d need to let them get damn close to make any of that have a hope in hell to hit / deflect anything…donald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑21 Jan 2023, 16:17 No problem, T31 has a 57mm gun which can fire 3P ammo and even guided ammo, 2x 40mm gun with 3P ammo. It also has a state of the art ESM/ECM and decoy launcher
If they are that crap, best use them close to home under a layered defence.
1: cheap and numerous "suicide drones"
2: fast-boat swarm, especially in "the first day" when it is still gray and ORE is strict, and RAF's Typhoon fighters cannot use Brimstone in number.
Especially for item-1, French FREMM can handle only up to 16 with its Aster-15, and has only one 76 mm gun (and 20mm guns), while T31 has one 57mm and two 40mm guns, which is better I think.
BAE in response to the shortcoming of the 3P round in that role developed a new guided munition intended specifically for the small boat, anti-swarm scenario, the Ordnance for Rapid Kill of Attack Craft, ORKA
US Navy held a competition for a new projectile specifically for the small boat, anti-swarm scenario, the BAE ORKA lost out to the L3Harris ALaMO smart projectile
Possible scenario - to be remembered the 57 mm fires only a small lightweight round 13-14 lbs vs 46 lbs of the 4.5" so max effective range is limited ~10 km / 5.4 nm, less than halfway to horizon and the IRGC fleet said to more than 1,000 small craft and say if fitted the 10 km Kornett -EM or equivalent, so debateable if the T31 armed with single 57 mm could fight off swarm attack by 40-50 craft if operating on its own? Will the RN procure the ALaMO.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5556
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Lets not forget that type 31 will also be carrying a Wildcat with 20 LMM
But we do know is the RN has placed a contract for 57 & 40mm 3P rounds for T31
But we do know is the RN has placed a contract for 57 & 40mm 3P rounds for T31
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Well, having seen video of the P3 against small craft, all I can say is that I would not like to be on a "small craft" with one of those firing at me. To render one inoperative, killing the crew would seem pretty effective.
As for your scenario
Range of BAE 57mm is given as 16.6km (9nm)
Effective range - unguided ammunition (assuming 2/3rds of max range) - 11km
Range of P3 ammunition - > 16.6km (>9nm)
Horizon at 20m (example radar height) 16km
Horizon at 2.5 m (crew standing on deck of small craft) - 5.6km
So, the T-31 will see them 10km before they can see the T-31.
- At a minimum, it can target the small boat at 11km range (16 with P3). In any sea state where small craft can be used, it will be completely stable.
The small boat will see the T-31 at 5.6km range. At 50knots, they will have a faceful of spray and be unable to stand upright.
The small boat will take 6 to 7 minutes to close the gap at 50 knots (much slower if it's anything other than a flat calm), before it can see the T-31. The T-31 could fire an entire magazine of 1000 rounds in that time, if it chooses to.
The small boat would likely have to close to < 1km and slow almost to walking pace to have any chance of a hit with a shoulder-launched ATGM.
- These users liked the author Caribbean for the post (total 2):
- wargame_insomniac • Dave
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
A correction to my above post re the 57mm Mk 3 and its 3P projectile, Navy Lookout quotes 2,400 tungsten pellets with 450 gram PBX charge which looks more realistic, 5 grams each? in a well researched article on the 57 mm.
https://www.navylookout.com/in-focus-th ... -frigates/
What we do know from USN trials is that the 3P is not an effective projectile in the small boat, anti-swarm scenario, why the ORKA and ALaMO projectiles were developed.
https://www.navylookout.com/in-focus-th ... -frigates/
We have seen in Ukraine how vulnerable helos are to MANPADS, Stingers/Strela 3/Starstreak etc, would not expect any problem for MANPADS to carried on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps small boats. How much a threat would they pose to a Wildcat?Tempest414 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 11:36
Lets not forget that type 31 will also be carrying a Wildcat with 20 LMM
But we do know is the RN has placed a contract for 57 & 40mm 3P rounds for T31
What we do know from USN trials is that the 3P is not an effective projectile in the small boat, anti-swarm scenario, why the ORKA and ALaMO projectiles were developed.
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
The confusion seems to be down to the BAE sales brochure
Lethality – The projectile section
delivers over 8,000 pre-formed
tungsten fragments in reaction to 420
grams of PBX-explosive. With a range
of greater than nine nautical miles, the
projectiles achieve devastating effects
against all target types in any selected
mode of fuze operation
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5556
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
There is a World of different's between firing a MANPAD from a concealed position on land and firing the same weapon from a fast moving and maneuvering small boat against a high speed maneuvering helicopter my guess is you would not see the helicopter let alone get a shot offNickC wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 13:03 A correction to my above post re the 57mm Mk 3 and its 3P projectile, Navy Lookout quotes 2,400 tungsten pellets with 450 gram PBX charge which looks more realistic, 5 grams each? in a well researched article on the 57 mm.
https://www.navylookout.com/in-focus-th ... -frigates/We have seen in Ukraine how vulnerable helos are to MANPADS, Stingers/Strela 3/Starstreak etc, would not expect any problem for MANPADS to carried on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps small boats. How much a threat would they pose to a Wildcat?Tempest414 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 11:36
Lets not forget that type 31 will also be carrying a Wildcat with 20 LMM
But we do know is the RN has placed a contract for 57 & 40mm 3P rounds for T31
What we do know from USN trials is that the 3P is not an effective projectile in the small boat, anti-swarm scenario, why the ORKA and ALaMO projectiles were developed.
You could try your self if you have pickup tuck standing in the back when it driving around at say 40 MPH and weaving about to miss cones you would be doing well to stand up let alone hold the weapon
- These users liked the author Tempest414 for the post (total 4):
- jimthelad • Caribbean • Ron5 • Dave
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5545
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Exactly. Existence of ALaMO is the very important factor of the 57mm gun. It is already fielded in number, not a "pipe-dream" anymore. Also, MADFIRES will be coming, but not yet fielded. Not sure it will be successful though, but USN is investing A LOT there.
I see no good tactics to use 114 mm nor 127 mm non-guided rounds against fast boat swarms. I understand that is deemed to be inefficient. What is more, T31 is there to handle the gray-zone, which will be with very strict ROE. Firing a deadly 114 mm ammo against targets 10 km away is very unlikely to happen. What if they are just a fast fishermen's boat? And, handling fast boats in short range with 240 rpm fire rate with ALaMO rounds is the best way to handle it, I think.Possible scenario - to be remembered the 57 mm fires only a small lightweight round 13-14 lbs vs 46 lbs of the 4.5" so max effective range is limited ~10 km / 5.4 nm, less than halfway to horizon and the IRGC fleet said to more than 1,000 small craft and say if fitted the 10 km Kornett -EM or equivalent, so debateable if the T31 armed with single 57 mm could fight off swarm attack by 40-50 craft if operating on its own? Will the RN procure the ALaMO.
[EDIT] This means, on paper, using 57 mm guns with ALaMo at 5 km distance will enable 5 times more engagements than a 114 mm gun firing at a distance of 10km (because, rate of fire is 10 times higher, and ALaMO will be virtually "one-shot one-kill"). Yes, ALaMO changes the world. I understand, fast-boat swarm is already a dead tactics. (of course, Iran will try inventing something new, but it another story).
On the other hand, against drones/slow-UAVs, the proximity rounds added with laser-range-finder assisted FCS shall be very efficient. Even one-shot one-kill. And, again a 114 mm /127 mm gun can only fire at 20-25 rpm, 10 times less than a 57mm gun. The 114/127mm shell is more powerful, but it will not hit 10 UAVs at one shock (because those UAVs will not fly so tightly).
I understand 1x 57mm and 2x 40mm gun on T31 is much more efficient and effective than any exiting and near future escorts in RN.
- These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
A few pointsCaribbean wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 12:46Well, having seen video of the P3 against small craft, all I can say is that I would not like to be on a "small craft" with one of those firing at me. To render one inoperative, killing the crew would seem pretty effective.
As for your scenario
Range of BAE 57mm is given as 16.6km (9nm)
Effective range - unguided ammunition (assuming 2/3rds of max range) - 11km
Range of P3 ammunition - > 16.6km (>9nm)
Horizon at 20m (example radar height) 16km
Horizon at 2.5 m (crew standing on deck of small craft) - 5.6km
So, the T-31 will see them 10km before they can see the T-31.
The T-31 also has two 40mm guns, which could start to engage inside 10-11km and engage effectively with conventional ammunition as they breach the horizon. It also has 50 cal and miniguns that could engage within 1km. US tests showed that a 50 cal could stop a fast boat at 50knot in around 45 seconds.
- At a minimum, it can target the small boat at 11km range (16 with P3). In any sea state where small craft can be used, it will be completely stable.
The small boat will see the T-31 at 5.6km range. At 50knots, they will have a faceful of spray and be unable to stand upright.
The small boat will take 6 to 7 minutes to close the gap at 50 knots (much slower if it's anything other than a flat calm), before it can see the T-31. The T-31 could fire an entire magazine of 1000 rounds in that time, if it chooses to.
The small boat would likely have to close to < 1km and slow almost to walking pace to have any chance of a hit with a shoulder-launched ATGM.
"Range of BAE 57mm is given as 16.6km (9nm)//Range of P3 ammunition - > 16.6km (>9nm)" that is the theoretical max range with gun firing with barrel at an optimum fixed angle of 45 degrees.
"Effective range - unguided ammunition (assuming 2/3rds of max range) - 11km" the 3P is an unguided round so would expect would need to fire a very high number of rounds to have a statistical chance of getting on target of a fast moving small craft due the projectiles normal dispersion at that range.
To overcome these limitations why the 10 km ORKA was designed with a semi-active imaging seeker that can be laser guided or seek its target autonomously by downloading an image of the target prior to firing, its data sheet suggests that the target image is cued from a designating laser and with the ORKA guided projectile correcting its aim via a system of four folding canards. Very limited info on the ALaMO projectile which said to have four firing bolts to correct its aim in flight.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps small boats will be operating in the Straits of Hormuz, one of the world's most strategically important choke points only 30 miles wide, they will have land based reconnaissance aircraft able to see T31 long before its able to see the IRGC small boats set up to ambush it.
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
If the frigate can see the small boat, the small boat can see the frigate.Caribbean wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 12:46Well, having seen video of the P3 against small craft, all I can say is that I would not like to be on a "small craft" with one of those firing at me. To render one inoperative, killing the crew would seem pretty effective.
As for your scenario
Range of BAE 57mm is given as 16.6km (9nm)
Effective range - unguided ammunition (assuming 2/3rds of max range) - 11km
Range of P3 ammunition - > 16.6km (>9nm)
Horizon at 20m (example radar height) 16km
Horizon at 2.5 m (crew standing on deck of small craft) - 5.6km
So, the T-31 will see them 10km before they can see the T-31.
The T-31 also has two 40mm guns, which could start to engage inside 10-11km and engage effectively with conventional ammunition as they breach the horizon. It also has 50 cal and miniguns that could engage within 1km. US tests showed that a 50 cal could stop a fast boat at 50knot in around 45 seconds.
- At a minimum, it can target the small boat at 11km range (16 with P3). In any sea state where small craft can be used, it will be completely stable.
The small boat will see the T-31 at 5.6km range. At 50knots, they will have a faceful of spray and be unable to stand upright.
The small boat will take 6 to 7 minutes to close the gap at 50 knots (much slower if it's anything other than a flat calm), before it can see the T-31. The T-31 could fire an entire magazine of 1000 rounds in that time, if it chooses to.
The small boat would likely have to close to < 1km and slow almost to walking pace to have any chance of a hit with a shoulder-launched ATGM.
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Many moons ago, the RN decided helos were the answer to fast boats. And has proved since that it was a good choice. I don't see that anything has materially affected this either way since. Wildcat radar detects hostile small boat many miles from host ship, helo sinks boat with missile or gun. End of story.donald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 14:20Exactly. Existence of ALaMO is the very important factor of the 57mm gun. It is already fielded in number, not a "pipe-dream" anymore. Also, MADFIRES will be coming, but not yet fielded. Not sure it will be successful though, but USN is investing A LOT there.I see no good tactics to use 114 mm nor 127 mm non-guided rounds against fast boat swarms. I understand that is deemed to be inefficient. What is more, T31 is there to handle the gray-zone, which will be with very strict ROE. Firing a deadly 114 mm ammo against targets 10 km away is very unlikely to happen. What if they are just a fast fishermen's boat? And, handling fast boats in short range with 240 rpm fire rate with ALaMO rounds is the best way to handle it, I think.Possible scenario - to be remembered the 57 mm fires only a small lightweight round 13-14 lbs vs 46 lbs of the 4.5" so max effective range is limited ~10 km / 5.4 nm, less than halfway to horizon and the IRGC fleet said to more than 1,000 small craft and say if fitted the 10 km Kornett -EM or equivalent, so debateable if the T31 armed with single 57 mm could fight off swarm attack by 40-50 craft if operating on its own? Will the RN procure the ALaMO.
[EDIT] This means, on paper, using 57 mm guns with ALaMo at 5 km distance will enable 5 times more engagements than a 114 mm gun firing at a distance of 10km (because, rate of fire is 10 times higher, and ALaMO will be virtually "one-shot one-kill"). Yes, ALaMO changes the world. I understand, fast-boat swarm is already a dead tactics. (of course, Iran will try inventing something new, but it another story).
On the other hand, against drones/slow-UAVs, the proximity rounds added with laser-range-finder assisted FCS shall be very efficient. Even one-shot one-kill. And, again a 114 mm /127 mm gun can only fire at 20-25 rpm, 10 times less than a 57mm gun. The 114/127mm shell is more powerful, but it will not hit 10 UAVs at one shock (because those UAVs will not fly so tightly).
I understand 1x 57mm and 2x 40mm gun on T31 is much more efficient and effective than any exiting and near future escorts in RN.
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5556
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
The type 31 will also have Info coming to it in the form of MPAs flown by allies in the region and will know of any build up against it
- These users liked the author Tempest414 for the post:
- Ron5
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
On June 20, 2019, Iran's integrated system of Air Defense Forces shot down a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone with a surface-to-air missile over the Strait of Hormuz.Tempest414 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 14:45 The type 31 will also have Info coming to it in the form of MPAs flown by allies in the region and will know of any build up against it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Iran ... ican_drone
Don't think anyone is going to risk operating a MPA in the area.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5545
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
So now with BOTH (up to 2) Wildcats and USN-designed state of the art "57mm with ALaMO" capable, T31 is much more capable in tasks at strait of Hormuz than any of the exiting RN assets.Ron5 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 14:41Many moons ago, the RN decided helos were the answer to fast boats. And has proved since that it was a good choice. I don't see that anything has materially affected this either way since. Wildcat radar detects hostile small boat many miles from host ship, helo sinks boat with missile or gun. End of story.
I actually think this fact make T31 distinct from T21. T21 was a ship which can do anything in 2nd or 3rd-rated level. T21's
- ASW was low,
- NGFS is normal,
- ASuW was normal,
- and AAW was miserably low.
T31's
- ASW is low (but brand-new torpedo defense makes big sense),
- NGFS is not required anymore,
- ASuW is low against frigate level, but the RN's best asset against fast-boat swarm
- AAW is low against hi-end ASM, but the RN's best asset against UAV drones.
This is why I say T31 is NOT BAD. It is well designed for their task. Very different from T21, which was not useless, but good for nothing.
- These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Only if we overlook the reality of radar spotting, categorising, course plotting and determining a firing solution for a boat vs the Mk 1 eyeball spotting the tip of a radar mast while being continually hit by spray and being bounced around in a fast boat on anything but a millpond.
They might, of course, spot the helicopter or drone that picks up their approach while well over the visual horizon.
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5556
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
don't be a twat MPA's operate in the area all day and all night 356 days a year Iran pushed its luck and shot down a drone had that been the P8 that was also operating in the area at the same all hell would of broken out do you really think for one second that the allies are going to let Iran push them out of the straitsNickC wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 15:00On June 20, 2019, Iran's integrated system of Air Defense Forces shot down a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone with a surface-to-air missile over the Strait of Hormuz.Tempest414 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 14:45 The type 31 will also have Info coming to it in the form of MPAs flown by allies in the region and will know of any build up against it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Iran ... ican_drone
Don't think anyone is going to risk operating a MPA in the area.
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
£65 million contract with BAES in Nov 22 covering 3P, simulation and support.Tempest414 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 11:36 Lets not forget that type 31 will also be carrying a Wildcat with 20 LMM
But we do know is the RN has placed a contract for 57 & 40mm 3P rounds for T31
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Not quite what you said in the original comment but whatever. BTW radar detection equipment can be small & cheap. Ask your local police dept.Caribbean wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 16:28Only if we overlook the reality of radar spotting, categorising, course plotting and determining a firing solution for a boat vs the Mk 1 eyeball spotting the tip of a radar mast while being continually hit by spray and being bounced around in a fast boat on anything but a millpond.
They might, of course, spot the helicopter or drone that picks up their approach while well over the visual horizon.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
And that is the T31 as presently understood to be equipped a built.donald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 15:33So now with BOTH (up to 2) Wildcats and USN-designed state of the art "57mm with ALaMO" capable, T31 is much more capable in tasks at strait of Hormuz than any of the exiting RN assets.Ron5 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 14:41Many moons ago, the RN decided helos were the answer to fast boats. And has proved since that it was a good choice. I don't see that anything has materially affected this either way since. Wildcat radar detects hostile small boat many miles from host ship, helo sinks boat with missile or gun. End of story.
I actually think this fact make T31 distinct from T21. T21 was a ship which can do anything in 2nd or 3rd-rated level. T21's
- ASW was low,
- NGFS is normal,
- ASuW was normal,
- and AAW was miserably low.
T31's
- ASW is low (but brand-new torpedo defense makes big sense),
- NGFS is not required anymore,
- ASuW is low against frigate level, but the RN's best asset against fast-boat swarm
- AAW is low against hi-end ASM, but the RN's best asset against UAV drones.
This is why I say T31 is NOT BAD. It is well designed for their task. Very different from T21, which was not useless, but good for nothing.
Firstly, we have assumed that only 12 CAMM - I hope this number can be increased, quickly and easily increased on handover for outfitting to at least 24, which would double it's endurance in AAW.
Secondly the RN is acquiring 11 sets of NSM. Clearly in the short term they will be allocated to T45's and T23's. WE know the T26's are fitted with 24 Mark 41 "strike-length VLS" cells, and that is expectd to carry the FC/ASW anti-ship missile. Therefore I think it is no coincidence that the 11 sets ordered will match precisely with 6*T45's and 5*T31s. We know that the Iver Huidfeldt class can carry up to 16*Harpoon Block II SSM - therefore the T31s should easily be able to accomodate the likely 8*NSMs.
The increase to 24 CAMM and 8 NSM I believe are the two most likeiest upgrades to T31, in terms of low cost considering initial acquisition cost, subsequent upkeep cost, and additional crew requirements.
(Note the RN would have alreasy bought the NSM - therefore would just be marginal cost of moving them to T31s from T23s, as the T23s are retired).
Therefore by the time they are actively commissioned into RN, I believe they would have better ASuW and AAW than you have factored in. (Add a sonar and they would be better at ASW also, even if they are never as good as the much more expensive ASW specialist T26s).
- These users liked the author wargame_insomniac for the post:
- mrclark303
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 813
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
An excellent hypothesis.....wargame_insomniac wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 17:07And that is the T31 as presently understood to be equipped a built.donald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 15:33So now with BOTH (up to 2) Wildcats and USN-designed state of the art "57mm with ALaMO" capable, T31 is much more capable in tasks at strait of Hormuz than any of the exiting RN assets.Ron5 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023, 14:41Many moons ago, the RN decided helos were the answer to fast boats. And has proved since that it was a good choice. I don't see that anything has materially affected this either way since. Wildcat radar detects hostile small boat many miles from host ship, helo sinks boat with missile or gun. End of story.
I actually think this fact make T31 distinct from T21. T21 was a ship which can do anything in 2nd or 3rd-rated level. T21's
- ASW was low,
- NGFS is normal,
- ASuW was normal,
- and AAW was miserably low.
T31's
- ASW is low (but brand-new torpedo defense makes big sense),
- NGFS is not required anymore,
- ASuW is low against frigate level, but the RN's best asset against fast-boat swarm
- AAW is low against hi-end ASM, but the RN's best asset against UAV drones.
This is why I say T31 is NOT BAD. It is well designed for their task. Very different from T21, which was not useless, but good for nothing.
Firstly, we have assumed that only 12 CAMM - I hope this number can be increased, quickly and easily increased on handover for outfitting to at least 24, which would double it's endurance in AAW.
Secondly the RN is acquiring 11 sets of NSM. Clearly in the short term they will be allocated to T45's and T23's. WE know the T26's are fitted with 24 Mark 41 "strike-length VLS" cells, and that is expectd to carry the FC/ASW anti-ship missile. Therefore I think it is no coincidence that the 11 sets ordered will match precisely with 6*T45's and 5*T31s. We know that the Iver Huidfeldt class can carry up to 16*Harpoon Block II SSM - therefore the T31s should easily be able to accomodate the likely 8*NSMs.
The increase to 24 CAMM and 8 NSM I believe are the two most likeiest upgrades to T31, in terms of low cost considering initial acquisition cost, subsequent upkeep cost, and additional crew requirements.
(Note the RN would have alreasy bought the NSM - therefore would just be marginal cost of moving them to T31s from T23s, as the T23s are retired).
Therefore by the time they are actively commissioned into RN, I believe they would have better ASuW and AAW than you have factored in. (Add a sonar and they would be better at ASW also, even if they are never as good as the much more expensive ASW specialist T26s).
- These users liked the author mrclark303 for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
They won't have NSM when they're commissioned...
- These users liked the author dmereifield for the post (total 2):
- donald_of_tokyo • Ron5