Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.

What will be the result of the 'Lighter Frigate' programme?

Programme cancelled, RN down to 14 escorts
52
10%
Programme cancelled & replaced with GP T26
14
3%
A number of heavy OPVs spun as "frigates"
127
25%
An LCS-like modular ship
22
4%
A modernised Type 23
24
5%
A Type 26-lite
71
14%
Less than 5 hulls
22
4%
5 hulls
71
14%
More than 5 hulls
103
20%
 
Total votes: 506

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Lord Jim »

If the T-31 gains two or more eight cell Mk41s then it would make sense for the RN to look at the ExLS Quad Pack system again. We could possibly see the Batch 2 T-26 replacing the Mushrooms with an additional two eight cell Mk41s amidships but these would probably not be "Strike" length launchers meaning large missile like the Tomahawk could not be used. On the plus side the T-26 could fit 64 CAMM in these two launchers or even a mix of CAMM and CAMM-ER. I believe VL ASROC or similar sized weapons would also fit. These would be the same Mk41 version as should be fitted to the T-31, able to fire CAMM and a number of other weapons including AShMs. I do not know what length of Mk41 is needed to fore the SM-6 Blk 1B though.
These users liked the author Lord Jim for the post:
wargame_insomniac

Jake1992
Senior Member
Posts: 2006
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 22:35
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Jake1992 »

Lord Jim wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 17:17 If the T-31 gains two or more eight cell Mk41s then it would make sense for the RN to look at the ExLS Quad Pack system again. We could possibly see the Batch 2 T-26 replacing the Mushrooms with an additional two eight cell Mk41s amidships but these would probably not be "Strike" length launchers meaning large missile like the Tomahawk could not be used. On the plus side the T-26 could fit 64 CAMM in these two launchers or even a mix of CAMM and CAMM-ER. I believe VL ASROC or similar sized weapons would also fit. These would be the same Mk41 version as should be fitted to the T-31, able to fire CAMM and a number of other weapons including AShMs. I do not know what length of Mk41 is needed to fore the SM-6 Blk 1B though.
When we look at both the RAN and RCN version of the T26 we can see that the current forward missile section can house 4 8 cell Mk41s along the current back row and also house them where we have the mushroom cells, it appears this forward space has room to house up to 48 Mk41s in 6 sets of 8 cells.

As for ExLS I believe the RN have a been foolish not to adopt it as the mushroom cells take away from one of CAMMs best qualities of its close packing.

From the looks of the design I believe the T26s full capabilities would alllw it to have 48 Mk41s ( all strike length ) forward and 12-15 ExLS mid ship allow 48-64 CAMM / CAMM-ER

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by bobp »

Jake1992 wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 18:35
Lord Jim wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 17:17 If the T-31 gains two or more eight cell Mk41s then it would make sense for the RN to look at the ExLS Quad Pack system again. We could possibly see the Batch 2 T-26 replacing the Mushrooms with an additional two eight cell Mk41s amidships but these would probably not be "Strike" length launchers meaning large missile like the Tomahawk could not be used. On the plus side the T-26 could fit 64 CAMM in these two launchers or even a mix of CAMM and CAMM-ER. I believe VL ASROC or similar sized weapons would also fit. These would be the same Mk41 version as should be fitted to the T-31, able to fire CAMM and a number of other weapons including AShMs. I do not know what length of Mk41 is needed to fore the SM-6 Blk 1B though.
When we look at both the RAN and RCN version of the T26 we can see that the current forward missile section can house 4 8 cell Mk41s along the current back row and also house them where we have the mushroom cells, it appears this forward space has room to house up to 48 Mk41s in 6 sets of 8 cells.

As for ExLS I believe the RN have a been foolish not to adopt it as the mushroom cells take away from one of CAMMs best qualities of its close packing.

From the looks of the design I believe the T26s full capabilities would alllw it to have 48 Mk41s ( all strike length ) forward and 12-15 ExLS mid ship allow 48-64 CAMM / CAMM-ER
Impressive amount of launchers but what about the missiles and the cost of them.

Jake1992
Senior Member
Posts: 2006
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 22:35
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Jake1992 »

bobp wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 20:51
Jake1992 wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 18:35
Lord Jim wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 17:17 If the T-31 gains two or more eight cell Mk41s then it would make sense for the RN to look at the ExLS Quad Pack system again. We could possibly see the Batch 2 T-26 replacing the Mushrooms with an additional two eight cell Mk41s amidships but these would probably not be "Strike" length launchers meaning large missile like the Tomahawk could not be used. On the plus side the T-26 could fit 64 CAMM in these two launchers or even a mix of CAMM and CAMM-ER. I believe VL ASROC or similar sized weapons would also fit. These would be the same Mk41 version as should be fitted to the T-31, able to fire CAMM and a number of other weapons including AShMs. I do not know what length of Mk41 is needed to fore the SM-6 Blk 1B though.
When we look at both the RAN and RCN version of the T26 we can see that the current forward missile section can house 4 8 cell Mk41s along the current back row and also house them where we have the mushroom cells, it appears this forward space has room to house up to 48 Mk41s in 6 sets of 8 cells.

As for ExLS I believe the RN have a been foolish not to adopt it as the mushroom cells take away from one of CAMMs best qualities of its close packing.

From the looks of the design I believe the T26s full capabilities would alllw it to have 48 Mk41s ( all strike length ) forward and 12-15 ExLS mid ship allow 48-64 CAMM / CAMM-ER
Impressive amount of launchers but what about the missiles and the cost of them.
I accept that to fill them would come at a cost but I’m of the mind set that it’s cheaper and quicker to rush buy missiles and slip them in the VLS in a time of need than it is to try and “quickly” retrofit the VLS to said ship.

But the statement was more to show what the T26 could be fitted to if the RN wanted and how the use of ExLS mid ship instead of the wasteful mushroom set up could free up usable space forward.
These users liked the author Jake1992 for the post:
wargame_insomniac

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by bobp »

I agree that having the launchers available is a good thing. And yes there is an option to procure missiles as say a UOR, but modern weapons can not be produced rapidly. There needs to be an adequate war stock for troubled times. Pity that the money for such a situation is not there.
These users liked the author bobp for the post:
KiwiMuzz

KiwiMuzz
Member
Posts: 58
Joined: 01 Jul 2021, 06:20
New Zealand

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by KiwiMuzz »

bobp wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 22:14 I agree that having the launchers available is a good thing. And yes there is an option to procure missiles as say a UOR, but modern weapons can not be produced rapidly. There needs to be an adequate war stock for troubled times. Pity that the money for such a situation is not there.
Indeed. Defence contractors don't make their profits by tying up hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of stock in warehouses in case someone needs them in a hurry! Any UOR will require a slot in someone's production schedule, and getting bumped up the list will cost big bucks.
These users liked the author KiwiMuzz for the post:
bobp

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

I understand UK/RN ammunition stock and engineering support is dangerously low, as noted in the following article.
https://www.navylookout.com/how-can-few ... avy-fleet/

For me, "filling the cilo" or, obtaining "enough stock of ammunition" are the highest priority. Of course, getting enough man-power is the second priority. "Adding more hulls" is just below them.

Buying enough ammo is much more important than up-arming anything or buying T32, I think.
These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post:
Repulse

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by bobp »

donald_of_tokyo wrote: 06 Jan 2022, 02:12 I understand UK/RN ammunition stock and engineering support is dangerously low, as noted in the following article.
https://www.navylookout.com/how-can-few ... avy-fleet/

For me, "filling the cilo" or, obtaining "enough stock of ammunition" are the highest priority. Of course, getting enough man-power is the second priority. "Adding more hulls" is just below them.

Buying enough ammo is much more important than up-arming anything or buying T32, I think.
Ammunition, spare parts, personnel, training and proper maintenance makes a better ship. :D
These users liked the author bobp for the post:
donald_of_tokyo

Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1701
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Scimitar54 »

donald_of_Tokyo Wrote,
For me, "filling the cilo" or, obtaining "enough stock of ammunition" are the highest priority. Of course, getting enough man-power is the second priority. "Adding more hulls" is just below them.
Donald San, I would agree with you, but for just one fly in the ointment. As the RN manpower is sufficient to provide un-necessary “double crewing” of some escorts, the real priority order is for the last two (of the three) to be reversed. This will become even more relevant as the replacement of T23GP by T31 occurs. :mrgreen:

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4583
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Repulse »

donald_of_tokyo wrote: 06 Jan 2022, 02:12 …RN ammunition stock and engineering support is dangerously low…
I’m not a logistics expert, and I’m sure there are many complexities / provisions in the supply chain that are not apparent to us mere mortals. However, prioritising flashy kit over the ability to fight and sustain the fight is the usual political BS we’ve come to expect. If the defence media know it so will Russia, China and every other potential foe out there. It almost like everyone still believes there is zero chance of a war and therefore it doesn’t matter - having this lack of preparedness makes war more likely as people try to take advantage.

This is exactly why we should be laser focused on requirements, rather than frigate numbers and wall charts. I would cancel every T31/T32 if it was the difference between having a CSG capable of war fighting for a sustained period or not.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by wargame_insomniac »

I thought this article was interesting, covering the advance deployment of HMS Montrose for 1,000+ days in Bahrain to cover patrolling abd protecting merchant shipping in the Persian Gulf.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/british ... sian-gulf/

I thibk this will be pertient to the T31's as currently the plan is for all 5 of the General Purpose Frigates to be advance deployed, especially to locations EoS.

NickC
Donator
Posts: 1432
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by NickC »

26th January Babcock have contracted KAEFER UK & Ireland to apply over 510,000m2 of specialist paint coatings, so 100,000 m2 per ship, surprising to me such a large number.

PS KAEFER UK & Ireland is a subsidiary of a family owned German company.

https://www.kaefer.com/KAEFER-in-UK-amp ... -Navy.html

User avatar
Jensy
Senior Member
Posts: 1061
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Jensy »

Type 31 still being pitched to Greece

Greek article with some notable claims.
https://navaldefence.gr/ektakto-h-type- ... enic-navy/
This morning, a Babcock delegation passed through the door of the Ministry of the Interior, with a proposal for the famous program of "corvettes". The only difference is that the British do not bring a proposal for a corvette of 2500-3000 tons, but for a displacement frigate of 5700 tons. They know very well that the Ministry of Defense does not choose to buy corvettes for reasons of ease of use, but for reasons of need and cost. Therefore, it comes with a proposal, which we can hardly refuse.
The article claims that Babcock are no longer offering an Arrowhead derivative but instead a RN spec Type 31, or close enough.
In the total cost, the British also offer the modernization of the 4 MEKO200HN, with systems similar to those that will be installed in the Type 31HN. The proposal for the modernization of MEKO200HIN is based on the wishes of the Navy, but also on the experience of Babcock with the modernization of MEKO200ANZAC of Australia and New Zealand.
Considering HII have not given up on Greece, and are still aggressively pitching their maxed out Freedom Class, it seems Babcock have decided to take another spin. Still offering build in Greece too, unlike France.

Good luck to them. Pitching a 5700t frigate in a competition for 3000t corvette adaptions has worked before!

P.S: I'm sure the penultimate sentence will make any RN fans smile.

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5552
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Tempest414 »

image is interesting shows 24 mushroom
These users liked the author Tempest414 for the post:
Jensy

User avatar
Jensy
Senior Member
Posts: 1061
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Jensy »

Tempest414 wrote: 02 Feb 2022, 18:00 image is interesting shows 24 mushroom
Good eye! Don't think we've seen this image before:

Image

Also piqued my personal obsession with the boat bays. Back to two port...
These users liked the author Jensy for the post:
donald_of_tokyo

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1409
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by tomuk »

Surely that's a 'fan' rendering. An official rendering wouldn't have rust stains on it. Plus I thought the potholes had been deleted on T31. Other oddities: rear boat bay door, midmast mesh panel, funnel 'exhaust pipes'
These users liked the author tomuk for the post (total 2):
donald_of_tokyoRepulse

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Lord Jim »

Now we just need that "Fan" to do a rendering with Mk41 VLS and AShM Canisters

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by dmereifield »

And that"Fan" to be the First Sea Lord....
These users liked the author dmereifield for the post (total 2):
jedibeeftrixLord Jim

90inFIRST
Member
Posts: 84
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:00
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by 90inFIRST »

Its from turbosquid
These users liked the author 90inFIRST for the post (total 2):
Tempest414Jensy

User avatar
RichardIC
Senior Member
Posts: 1371
Joined: 10 May 2015, 16:59
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by RichardIC »

These users liked the author RichardIC for the post (total 5):
donald_of_tokyoserge750wargame_insomniacJensyScimitar54

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by SKB »


jonas
Senior Member
Posts: 1110
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:20
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by jonas »


User avatar
Dave
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: 02 May 2015, 22:24
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Dave »

jonas wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 14:06
Though other Polish Twitter users are saying the decision has already been made, and Babcock is the #1 preferred option.


donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Just simply quite reasonable...

These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post (total 3):
wargame_insomniacjedibeeftrixSD67

User avatar
Cooper
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: 01 May 2015, 08:11
Korea North

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Post by Cooper »

Doesn't matter.

The Separatist scum have already written off shipbuilding in Scotland as an acceptable sacrifice...For others to make on their behalf. :roll:
These users liked the author Cooper for the post:
jimthelad

Post Reply