Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by wargame_insomniac »

“The First Sea Lord has just said 60 F-35, then maybe more up to around 80 for 4 deployable squadrons.”

That sounds great news. From the article, and the spending commitment of £1,400 million, it does sound as if they are buying a 2nd tranche of another 12 (or maybe 13) F35b:
https://ukdj.imgix.net/2022/02/figure44 ... 6fca378c10

If they can then maybe follow up with a future 3rd tranche of another 20 later on, that would get us to 80 aircraft. Hopefylly enough for the 4 deployable squadrons mentioned plus a training squadron. With 16 aircraft each that would allow full squadron of 12, plus 4 spare airframes.
These users liked the author wargame_insomniac for the post (total 2):
PhillyJWrekin1410

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 3958
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Good news.

Hopefully in time the full 74 will be transferred across to the Fleet Air Arm to allow the RAF to concentrate on Tempest.

https://www.navylookout.com/uk-to-purch ... f-35-jets/
These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post:
wargame_insomniac

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

I'd like to see FAA specific F-35B's and their pilots moved from Marham to Yeovilton. As it should have been.

Digger22
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: 27 May 2015, 16:47
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Digger22 »

Whatever the Final number, I hardly consider it to be an increase in view of the original intended number.
And we can't forget we've already lost one.
I would also like to see F35 as a Navy only asset. Just a shame we will never own enough to fill two carriers.
These users liked the author Digger22 for the post (total 2):
whitelancerabc123

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by wargame_insomniac »

Digger22 wrote: 28 Apr 2022, 18:36 Whatever the Final number, I hardly consider it to be an increase in view of the original intended number.
And we can't forget we've already lost one.
I would also like to see F35 as a Navy only asset. Just a shame we will never own enough to fill two carriers.
If they get up to 74 *F35B, then we would just barely have enough for four operational squadrons and 1 training squadron, (with 15 airframes for each operational squadron and 14 for training squadron).

If these were dedicated to RN use, then could have two full squadrons with 12 aircraft per squadron for each Carrier Air Wing. That would allow one CSG to operate in rotation, with each carrier, it's own air wing, and the associated escort vessels would their refits and maintenance down time around that of the carrier.

Or might be able to occasionally surge the strike carrier to have 36*F35B onboard and the 2d carrier, used more in helicopter support rol could still carry one squadron of 12*F35B for self defence.

S M H
Member
Posts: 433
Joined: 03 May 2015, 12:59
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by S M H »

I have always thought the original number was for the production run. That we would purchase numbers late in the program to keep the carrier air wing operational as the flying hours removed early or high hours airframes. This would allow fixed wing carrier ops to continue without expensive refit of the flight deck in later years. Given that the eighty figure is now banded about. Giving four operationsl jet squadrons eighty airframes makes sense. We may be near the original quoted numbers over the life of the program. As later orders are placed at the end of the production run. Rather than the purchase of airframes that are then stored and rotated to keep flighing hours balanced needing upgrades.The only down side to this method of procurement is that you don't have stored airframes to expand your operational aircraft in time of need.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5657
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SW1 »

If all navy is the answer the diehards believe how come the navy only and navy budgeted merlins are barely capable of generating a single air wing let alone two?

The problem is the whole premise of the ships themselves was built on a foundation of sand.

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Busy day tomorrow in the dockyard it seems, I also start a casual hours job after completing my wooden boat building course, yes it has been a whole year since I started that! I am now a deckhand on LCVP F8 of what was HMS Fearless, doing trips around Pompey harbour!
Screenshot_20220502-134616.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
These users liked the author PhillyJ for the post (total 5):
TimmymagicCaribbeanRepulseSKBserge750

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3224
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Timmymagic »

PhillyJ wrote: 02 May 2022, 13:49 I am now a deckhand on LCVP F8 of what was HMS Fearless, doing trips around Pompey harbour!
That sounds like an absolutely glorious job..
These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post:
PhillyJ

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Timmymagic wrote: 02 May 2022, 14:12
PhillyJ wrote: 02 May 2022, 13:49 I am now a deckhand on LCVP F8 of what was HMS Fearless, doing trips around Pompey harbour!
That sounds like an absolutely glorious job..
To be honest, I'd be quite happy doing it for free! Up to 4 trips a day boring the public with my knowledge of the ships and dockyard. 😎
These users liked the author PhillyJ for the post (total 5):
bobpwargame_insomniacTimmymagicJensyserge750

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

Timmymagic wrote: 02 May 2022, 14:12
PhillyJ wrote: 02 May 2022, 13:49 I am now a deckhand on LCVP F8 of what was HMS Fearless, doing trips around Pompey harbour!
That sounds like an absolutely glorious job..
Congratulations on your new post, I hope it all leads to a permanent full time position.
These users liked the author bobp for the post:
PhillyJ

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

A different perspective of watching QNLZ leaving Pompey Harbour, on Landing Craft F8 whilst doing engine and gearbox checks prior to letting the public on her for trips.
PXL_20220503_135841103.jpg
PXL_20220503_135858700.jpg
PXL_20220503_135949594.jpg
PXL_20220503_135952091.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
These users liked the author PhillyJ for the post (total 6):
SKBserge750Little JWrekin1410Timmymagicdjkeos

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Well, she's not doing the Gosport Ferry route, I wonder where she's off to?
These users liked the author SKB for the post:
PhillyJ

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

SKB wrote: 03 May 2022, 20:08 Well, she's not doing the Gosport Ferry route, I wonder where she's off to?
FOST apparently.
These users liked the author PhillyJ for the post:
Timmymagic

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

QE leaving Portsmouth yesterday.

(Portsmouth Harbour Boats) 3rd May 2022
These users liked the author SKB for the post (total 2):
easydiverPhillyJ

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Looks like QNLZ is doing FOST down in sunnier climes, a bit further afield than the normal cruise off the Dorset coast.
Screenshot_20220510-085056.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
These users liked the author PhillyJ for the post:
SKB

jonas
Senior Member
Posts: 1110
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:20
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by jonas »

These users liked the author jonas for the post:
Poiuytrewq

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

QE proceeding with FOST.....


Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1701
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Scimitar54 »

Fleet Operational Sun Tanning ?
These users liked the author Scimitar54 for the post:
PhillyJ

User avatar
Cooper
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: 01 May 2015, 08:11
Korea North

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Cooper »

Its getting really tiresome seeing pictures of these carriers at sea with everything on the flight deck except the one bloody thing they were built to carry.

..are they wrapping these F35's up in cotton wool with a 'Break glass in case of emergency' deployment rule or something.

Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1701
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Scimitar54 »

No, but it might be stickers saying “Do not expose to Salt or Water” that some wizard type from the Junior Service thought would be a way of retaining more control of OUR F35bs. :lol:
These users liked the author Scimitar54 for the post:
PhillyJ

downsizer
Member
Posts: 893
Joined: 02 May 2015, 08:03

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by downsizer »

Cooper wrote: 11 May 2022, 13:26 Its getting really tiresome seeing pictures of these carriers at sea with everything on the flight deck except the one bloody thing they were built to carry.

..are they wrapping these F35's up in cotton wool with a 'Break glass in case of emergency' deployment rule or something.
Not worth letting the ONE operational Sqn we have recover from the last trip they did?

If (and when) we have more Sqns you will see them embarked more.

Even in the "glory days" of SHAR Sqns still did a significant time ashore.
These users liked the author downsizer for the post (total 2):
PhillyJserge750

Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1701
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Scimitar54 »

Well, IT HAS been six months now, Perhaps they will venture out to join in the “Fleet Operational Sun Tanning” exercises ? :lol:
These users liked the author Scimitar54 for the post:
PhillyJ

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Is Gib able to have both carriers at the same time? Just wondering.

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

PhillyJ wrote: 12 May 2022, 08:04 Is Gib able to have both carriers at the same time? Just wondering.
hence my above question re Gib.

Post Reply