South China Sea

News and discussion threads on defence in other parts of the world.
bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2698
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: South China Sea

Post by bobp »

China wont back down it would be a loss of face for the ruling party.

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

Expect a large deployment into disputed seas by the People's Republic...
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

User avatar
Halidon
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: 12 May 2015, 01:34
United States of America

Re: South China Sea

Post by Halidon »

Wild card from now until at least November is the bat-guano crazy new president of the Philipines. He's looked (a little too) willing to deal with China on the SCS territorial issues, but this ruling pretty much nukes any veneer of legality on which to negotiate. Does this embolden him to take a hard line, does he use it as an opportunity to push for regional rather than bilateral solutions, or does it incentive the PRC to cut him a sweetheart deal that gets him a political "win" but undermines stability in the region?

FuNsTeR
Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 21:44

Re: South China Sea

Post by FuNsTeR »

bobp wrote:China wont back down it would be a loss of face for the ruling party.
is it any different from Israel ignoring the UN in regards to the illegal settlements in the West bank ?

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

I don't rate the Phillipines military against PRC.
A batshit guano crazy President should bear in mind that large swathes of the Phillipines are already in the SCS and therefore "Chinese."

;-)
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

PRC ups the ante with regular combat air patrols over the SCS.

http://www.janes.com/article/62389/chin ... -china-sea
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

User avatar
xav
Senior Member
Posts: 1626
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 22:48

Re: South China Sea

Post by xav »

PLAN flexing its muscles

PLAN Conducted Major Naval Drills Involving close to 100 Vessels & Units in South China Sea
Image
Our colleagues from Eastpendulum are reporting that the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN or Chinese Navy) conducted large scale naval drills in the South China Sea. The naval exercise involved close to 100 vessels, submarine, aircraft from the PLAN air force and coastal defense (land based) units during 4 days (between July 7 and 11, 2016).

Based on the pictures and videos of the exercise released by the PLAN, several vessels and systems can be identified:
» Destroyers: Type 052C Lanzhou (hull number 170), Type 052D Hefei (174), Type 052B Guangzhou (168) Type 051C Shenyang (115) and Sovremenyy-class destroyers Ningbo (139).
» Type 054A Frigates Hengyang (568), Huangshan (570), Yuncheng (571), Sanya (574) and Yueyang (575)
» Type 056 Corvettes Luzhou (592), Chaozhou (595) and Huizhou (596) and Type 056A Corvette Suqian (504)
» Type 039 and Kilo-class diesel-electric submarines (SSK)
» J-10AH, J-11BH, JH-7A and Su-30MKK fighters as well as H-6G bombers
» HQ-9 medium-to-long range air defense missile system
» YJ-62 coastal defence units
» The new YJ-12 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile launched from an H-6G
[...]
According to an official PLAN statement, the objective of this large scale exercise was to evaluate the integrated capability of the various units of the Chinese navy in case of a local conflict. The presence of the Commander of the Chinese navy, Admiral Wu Shengli, and officials of the General Staff throughout the maneuvers demonstrates the importance of this naval exercise.
With video at link: http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... ew&id=4222

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

China-Russia joint exercise announced in the SCS.

http://www.forces.tv/74659024
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

China's PLAAF conducts combat air patrols over Scarborough Shoals and the Spratly islands.

http://www.janes.com/article/62824/plaa ... -china-sea
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

User avatar
xav
Senior Member
Posts: 1626
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 22:48

Re: South China Sea

Post by xav »

Vietnam People's Navy deploys Bastion-P Mobile Coastal Defense Systems in drills
Image
The Vietnam People's Navy (VPN) has deployed the K-300P Bastion-P (NATO reporting name: SSC-5-C Stooge) mobile coastal defense missile systems (MCDMS) supplied by Moscow, according to a source in the Russian defense industry.
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... ew&id=4277

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

First of ten Japanese built MRRV's for Phillipines Coast Guard.

http://www.janes.com/article/63065/firs ... hilippines
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

China has been making threats of belligerent action in the East and South China Sea ( although no one seems really sure?) against its neighbours should they attempt a Freedom of Navigation mission.

http://breakingdefense.com/2016/08/chin ... s-fon-ops/
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: South China Sea

Post by abc123 »

arfah wrote:China has been making threats of belligerent action in the East and South China Sea
;)
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: South China Sea

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Judging by the rationale given for Indias's three carrier prgrm, that Ocean will be next.

As if the Persian/ Arabian Gulf wasn't being contested hotly enough.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: South China Sea

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

action in the East and South China Sea(s!)
- two interesting points here:
1. China seems to be building their CG OPVs on frigate hulls. The Cod War like actions of hugging the other party become possible w/o the military being directly involved (even though, no doubt, circling in immediate vicinity)
2. Out of the two nations explicitly mentioned, Japan has been one, which is worrying in the sense that both China and Japan are driving towards bundling these disputes
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

China warns Phillipines of confrontation.

Chinese Coastguard vessels Obstruct Phillipino fishermen near disputed Scarborough Shoals.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/ ... frontation
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: South China Sea

Post by abc123 »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:Judging by the rationale given for Indias's three carrier prgrm, that Ocean will be next.

As if the Persian/ Arabian Gulf wasn't being contested hotly enough.

Irony aside, any of these nations has far more right to determine things in that area than the US. Except if "force is right", but in that case poor little Vietnam or Phillipines have nothing to complain...
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

seaspear
Senior Member
Posts: 1779
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:16
Australia

Re: South China Sea

Post by seaspear »

The question is how can small nation states defend their sovereignity if a larger state will not accept the results of international court rulings ,
if the inability of court rulings can decide matters then certainly other nations can be expected by military dplomacy exert their "rights" .

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: South China Sea

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Freedom of navigation... or closed air defence zones? The latter are, of course, only a little test ball, thrown into the ring.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
Pseudo
Senior Member
Posts: 1732
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 21:37
Tuvalu

Re: South China Sea

Post by Pseudo »

seaspear wrote:The question is how can small nation states defend their sovereignity if a larger state will not accept the results of international court rulings ,
if the inability of court rulings can decide matters then certainly other nations can be expected by military dplomacy exert their "rights".
Surely the only answer is multinational enforcement, which probably boils down to primarily US enforcement alongside Japan, South Korea, Australia and possibly India.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: South China Sea

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Pseudo wrote: primarily US enforcement alongside Japan, South Korea, Australia and possibly India.
Yes, India already has naval facilities in Vietnam,

Let's not forget Singapore, which is a service centre (also in the maritime sense) for the whole region and to whom open SLOCs are a matter of life and death (the same goes for China, btw).
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

seaspear
Senior Member
Posts: 1779
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:16
Australia

Re: South China Sea

Post by seaspear »

To some degree what China has done off the coast of the Phillipines is similar to what Russia has achieved in the Ukraine ,whether Russia and China had discussions on tactics can be speculated ,certainly only Russia has faced economic sanctions suggesting China is to important to the worlds economy to face similar sanctions.

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

Indonesia to conduct its largest ever naval exercise in the SCS.

http://www.janes.com/article/64248/indo ... -china-sea
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: South China Sea

Post by arfah »

A few images and an article explaining Ex. Bersama Lima 16, courtesy of the Singapore government.

https://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/press ... AuC2nR4WhA
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: South China Sea

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

We would need the good old TD over here to draw the range circles out into the S. China Sea (and someone else to translate Mare Nostrum NOT into Mandarin):

"one weapon in the works directly inspired by Multi-Domain Battle: a version of the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMs) modified to strike ships at sea. Both Adm. Harris — eager for every advantage against the growing Chinese fleet — and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley have called for the Army to sink ships, and the Marines are interested as well. That’s a capability the ground services have lacked since the Coastal Artillery disbanded in 1950. Reviving it in the form of long-range precision missiles is the most dramatic and tangible example of the kind of change Multi-Domain Battle can bring — but it’s far from the only one." breakingdefence of today (from a much longer story)

So now the ground forces of Vietnam, Malesia, the Philippines... can concentrate on protecting these (mobiles) sites, and only subs will be able to move freely in pretty much all of that area.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Post Reply