MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Contains threads on Royal Air Force equipment of the past, present and future.
pko100
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 07 Feb 2020, 10:21
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by pko100 »

I remember being told years ago by someone (so I cannot confirm whether this is true or folklore), that when the original production contract was signed, the price of the final batch of 100 or 200 missiles was virtually zero as MBDA were fed up with MoD cancelling orders. Therefore there was no financial benefit to the MoD in reducing the size of the order. That could be the reason why the UK seems to have received more missiles than France.

BuddyBoy68
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 25 Feb 2023, 13:16
Scotland

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by BuddyBoy68 »

Received more missiles than France?... Aren't the British Storm Shadow missiles built in Britain?... Also, I believe Storm Shadow in France is called SCALP-EG, which stands for "Système de Croisière Autonome à Longue Portée – Emploi Général".

leonard
Member
Posts: 191
Joined: 21 May 2016, 17:52
Italy

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by leonard »

Breaking News!!!
It is now proven that the Storm Shadow in combination with the MALD decoys were used in yesterday and today's attacks in the Luhansk by the Ukrainian Air Force for the Russian air defences the combination was impossible to counter.
These users liked the author leonard for the post:
sunstersun

SD67
Senior Member
Posts: 1036
Joined: 23 Jul 2019, 09:49
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by SD67 »

Wow, there must have been quite some integration work going on over the past few months.

There was a classic Lewis Page whinge piece in the Telegraph the other day about how Storm Shadow is useless in Ukraine

Jdam
Member
Posts: 922
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by Jdam »

The reaction of the quick delivery and uses has shock the Russians so much they have been shooting down their own aircraft today :wtf:

I don't think I've seen such a reaction to any other weapon like the Storm Shadow in the last few days, it really does seem to have stirred things up.
These users liked the author Jdam for the post (total 4):
sunstersunleonardLittle Jmrclark303

sunstersun
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Aug 2017, 04:00
United States of America

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by sunstersun »

Jdam wrote: 13 May 2023, 16:35 The reaction of the quick delivery and uses has shock the Russians so much they have been shooting down their own aircraft today :wtf:

I don't think I've seen such a reaction to any other weapon like the Storm Shadow in the last few days, it really does seem to have stirred things up.
Storm Shadow is a legit ace.
These users liked the author sunstersun for the post:
leonard

Phil Sayers
Member
Posts: 365
Joined: 03 May 2015, 13:56

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by Phil Sayers »

Jdam wrote: 13 May 2023, 16:35 The reaction of the quick delivery and uses has shock the Russians so much they have been shooting down their own aircraft today :wtf:

I don't think I've seen such a reaction to any other weapon like the Storm Shadow in the last few days, it really does seem to have stirred things up.
IMO it's probably also down to the AGM160B MALD decoy missiles that the US has supplied for use in conjunction with Storm Shadow. Maybe used them today to spoof nervous Russian SAM operators into engaging their own aircraft as they think they are Storm Shadows inbound.

leonard
Member
Posts: 191
Joined: 21 May 2016, 17:52
Italy

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by leonard »

More clear pictures of the missiles remains on today attack

TheLoneRanger
Member
Posts: 331
Joined: 01 Jul 2020, 19:15
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by TheLoneRanger »

There are questions of what happened - the picture is unclear - did new Polish donated Mig29's fired off some donated AMRAAMs(unlikely - there would have been news of a transfer/donation) - did someone move a Patrict battery to the border for a session for a shoot and scoot mission - did the MALD decoys confuse their AD systems ...

Guessing Su-27 and Su-724s were used to launch the Storm Missiles.

Either way - it is welcome news.

User avatar
mrclark303
Donator
Posts: 813
Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by mrclark303 »

TheLoneRanger wrote: 14 May 2023, 10:16 There are questions of what happened - the picture is unclear - did new Polish donated Mig29's fired off some donated AMRAAMs(unlikely - there would have been news of a transfer/donation) - did someone move a Patrict battery to the border for a session for a shoot and scoot mission - did the MALD decoys confuse their AD systems ...

Guessing Su-27 and Su-724s were used to launch the Storm Missiles.

Either way - it is welcome news.
It's a curious one, is it really possible to set up the digital bus and avionics interface, develop hard points and trial it that fast???

I don't think it could be ground launched as there's no rocket assist, just a turbine engine, so it needs to be air dropped while the launch platform going 300-400 knots I would assume??

My guess would be some sort of SU24 interface

The good thing about Storm Shadow is it's a low radar signature platform with an equally low inferred signature, Ivan will be lucky to shoot any down....

mr.fred
Senior Member
Posts: 1468
Joined: 06 May 2015, 22:53
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by mr.fred »

mrclark303 wrote: 14 May 2023, 11:49 It's a curious one, is it really possible to set up the digital bus and avionics interface, develop hard points and trial it that fast???
If you are able to make it with restricted functionality and without full safety checks, probably.

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3224
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by Timmymagic »

pko100 wrote: 18 Feb 2023, 16:49 I remember being told years ago by someone (so I cannot confirm whether this is true or folklore), that when the original production contract was signed, the price of the final batch of 100 or 200 missiles was virtually zero as MBDA were fed up with MoD cancelling orders. Therefore there was no financial benefit to the MoD in reducing the size of the order. That could be the reason why the UK seems to have received more missiles than France.
We just purchased twice as many as them...(c1000 vs c500). The French were also looking to reduce their stockpile to c100. We were also only MLU'ing c400 of the remaining 800 missiles in our stockpile.

TheLoneRanger
Member
Posts: 331
Joined: 01 Jul 2020, 19:15
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by TheLoneRanger »

mrclark303 wrote: 14 May 2023, 11:49
TheLoneRanger wrote: 14 May 2023, 10:16 There are questions of what happened - the picture is unclear - did new Polish donated Mig29's fired off some donated AMRAAMs(unlikely - there would have been news of a transfer/donation) - did someone move a Patrict battery to the border for a session for a shoot and scoot mission - did the MALD decoys confuse their AD systems ...

Guessing Su-27 and Su-724s were used to launch the Storm Missiles.

Either way - it is welcome news.
It's a curious one, is it really possible to set up the digital bus and avionics interface, develop hard points and trial it that fast???
Given the power of modern computers and the of sophisticated virtualisation technology itself - you could run the interface to the missile on an Ipad Mini in the cockpit with a physical wire connected to tte missile directly - you would not necessairly need to wire into the bus itself ? The missile will be pre-programmed with both the route and target information - so all you need to do is just activate launch sequence and drop the missile for launch really.

HARMs were integrated onto Mig29s not so long ago, so i suspect the core problem of integration would have been solved some time ago - esp given that countries like Poland operated these aircraft - so they have a wealth of experience that they can bring to the front.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5657
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by SW1 »

Has it been stated the launch platform is a fastjet?

Phil Sayers
Member
Posts: 365
Joined: 03 May 2015, 13:56

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by Phil Sayers »

Ben Wallace strongly inferred that by saying that it wasn't easy to integrate the missile with Soviet jets and paying tribute to scientists / engineers. I have seen it claimed that trials were conducted with a SU-24 in Poland a few months back.
These users liked the author Phil Sayers for the post (total 2):
SW1mrclark303

SD67
Senior Member
Posts: 1036
Joined: 23 Jul 2019, 09:49
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by SD67 »

So Storm Shadow has been integrated on the SU24 in 3 month but not F35B after 10 years

Maybe we can hire the Ukranians as a kind of procurement agency
These users liked the author SD67 for the post:
mrclark303

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5657
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by SW1 »

SD67 wrote: 15 May 2023, 12:40 So Storm Shadow has been integrated on the SU24 in 3 month but not F35B after 10 years

Maybe we can hire the Ukranians as a kind of procurement agency
Stormshadow is not going to be integrated on f35b

RunningStrong
Senior Member
Posts: 1304
Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by RunningStrong »

SD67 wrote: 15 May 2023, 12:40 So Storm Shadow has been integrated on the SU24 in 3 month but not F35B after 10 years

Maybe we can hire the Ukranians as a kind of procurement agency
Stormshadow OSD doesn't fit with F35 very well. FCASW is the intended replacement.

SD67
Senior Member
Posts: 1036
Joined: 23 Jul 2019, 09:49
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by SD67 »

Thanks, I'm aware of the background, but FCASW doesn't actually exist at the moment - not in the 10 year equipment plan.. I simply don't believe it takes this long to integrate weapons on a modern platform, when Ukraine can jerry-rig an ancient SU24 in a couple of months. Even Meteor has apparently now slipped to 2027. The extended wait to get UK specific weapons on F35 is either the MOD being tight or LM supporting US industrial interests.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5657
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by SW1 »

The US dictates the aircraft configuration you submit requests to the f35 JPO and they decide if and when integration of new things happens.


As an example you can integrate an aar refuelling probe on a nimrod for war use in a matter of weeks but if you then don’t do it properly you end up in haddon-cave review territory.

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3224
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by Timmymagic »

SD67 wrote: 15 May 2023, 16:36 The extended wait to get UK specific weapons on F35 is either the MOD being tight or LM supporting US industrial interests.
Truth be told everyone is affected by weapons integration delays on F-35.

At the moment there are choice of 2 x WVR missiles on the outer wing pylon (Asraam and AIM-9X), 1x BVR missile on the bay doors or in the bays (AIM-120). And everything else is unpowered....a mixture of JDAM, Paveway variants and SDB1. There are no powered munitions cleared from the inner or mid wing pylons whatsover, and only Amraam from the bays. The only other thing cleared for operations is a baggage pod (not the new Kihomac internal only one yet, the old style) and I'm not sure if thats cleared for internal use only as I've not seen pics of it, only descriptions of its use in exercises. Even the un-powered JSOW and SDBII are not cleared operationally yet...

All of the other powered munitions whether UK, US or US/Norwegian (JSM) won't arrive until Block IV, its also unclear how many/if any of those are actually cleared for external carriage on the inner and mid pylons...although fit tests of JSM have been undertaken under the wings its not clear if external carriage and release are part of the trials...JASSM/LRASM might be the only one in Block IV to get integrated.
These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post (total 2):
SD67sunstersun

sunstersun
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Aug 2017, 04:00
United States of America

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by sunstersun »

Pretty much, there's no F-35 integration conspiracy. Everything is behind schedule.

GarethDavies1
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: 26 May 2021, 11:45
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by GarethDavies1 »

And over budget

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7249
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by Ron5 »

SW1 wrote: 15 May 2023, 16:53 As an example you can integrate an aar refuelling probe on a nimrod for war use in a matter of weeks
Didn't that cause the loss of an aircraft and crew?

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5657
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: MBDA Storm Shadow Missile (RAF)

Post by SW1 »

Ron5 wrote: 16 May 2023, 13:25
SW1 wrote: 15 May 2023, 16:53 As an example you can integrate an aar refuelling probe on a nimrod for war use in a matter of weeks
Didn't that cause the loss of an aircraft and crew?
It did and several near misses before that.

Post Reply