Australian Defence Force

News and discussion threads on defence in other parts of the world.

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Lord Jim »

Surprised at the choice of .300 Blackout for the round to be used with the Sig Sauer MCX. Do any other countries use this calibre in their main line military as against SF? Regardless an impressive selection of weapons chosen.

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

Lord Jim wrote: 03 Oct 2022, 16:46 Surprised at the choice of .300 Blackout for the round to be used with the Sig Sauer MCX. Do any other countries use this calibre in their main line military as against SF? Regardless an impressive selection of weapons chosen.
Yes, that's an interesting one. I'm not hundred percent sure who gets the PDW, to be honest. The EF-88 is still the main assault rifle for the vast majority, and I'm sure the full-blown SF units will still do their own thing if they feel like it, so who knows.

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

These users liked the author Mercator for the post:
wargame_insomniac

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Lord Jim »

When I think about it and it doesn't hurt when doing so, I like both platforms Bushmaster and Hwakei. I wonder if we could pay back Australia for choosing the Hunter Class, as well as fortifying our recent agreement with Australia and the US by purchasing both platforms as a quick solution to our dying MRV(P) programme and get Thales Australia to build a plant in the UK for any exports there may be in Europe in addition to the UK orders.

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

That's the thing though. I don't think you should try to do these things and expect exports. The market is too crowded for that. Exports are simply gravy. Do it because you want to build and modify your own vehicles to your own specifications and evolve capabilities. It's not that expensive, really. Australia has managed it – as have lots of other countries. You just have to start and have a slow rolling design and production over a couple of vehicle types and a 15-20 year life span before you start the whole process again. That's all we've done. If you force the factory to rely on exports to fill the gap in production orders, you're really just rolling the dice to see when your factory goes bust. It has to be managed.
These users liked the author Mercator for the post (total 2):
Scimitar54Lord Jim

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »


Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

Land Forces 2022: Australian Ties to US Missile Programmes
HiMARS, PrSM and JAGM all in Play
https://monch.com/land-forces-2022-aust ... rogrammes/

Paula Hartley, VP of Enterprise Performance for Missiles and Fire Control at Lockheed Martin, said $157 million contract for Increment 2 of PrSM at the end of September was for seeker integration to hit moving targets. Under the earlier Increment 1, the company is delivering 26 early operational capability PrSM from October 2022 to mid-2024. Increment 2, to which Australia is contributing A$70 million ($45.3 million), will see the delivery of an additional 54 missiles to the US which, Hartley said, will be followed by low-rate initial production. If Australia selects HiMARS, will not only fire the 70km-range Guided MLRS (GMLRS) weapon; it will also have access to the 499km-range PrSM capability.

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

Australian P-8 arrives in Sigonella, Italy to to spend time conducting patrols on behalf of NATO in the Mediterranean:
https://news.defence.gov.au/media/media ... iterranean

As part of the enduring Australia-NATO partnership, the ADF has deployed an RAAF P-8A Poseidon Maritime Patrol Aircraft to the Western and Central Mediterranean region to participate in NATO’s Operation SEA GUARDIAN 22. Operation SEA GUARDIAN is an ongoing non-Article 5 NATO maritime security operation aimed at maintaining maritime situational awareness, deterring and countering terrorism, and enhancing capacity building in the Mediterranean region. The learning opportunities for the ADF are significant, providing an opportunity to extend Australia’s interoperability with NATO to the maritime air patrol domain. Australia is an ‘Enhanced Opportunities Partner’ in recognition of our significant contributions to NATO operations. Australia works with NATO across a broad spectrum of areas, such as political dialogue, logistics, emerging challenges, and defence science and technology. Participation in Operation SEA GUARDIAN 22 is a natural step-up in our partnership. read less

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

Handy...

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2322
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

Mercator wrote: 10 Oct 2022, 23:19 Handy...
If they do that it will be good for all other defenc projects, but r mains to be seen if they wil continue the other part objects anyway

But from Marles rumblings over the past few days somehow I don’t think defence is going to come out the other end very well

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

I still don't think he'll change much. But I guess we'll see how wrong I can be.

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2322
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

Defence eyes $5bn corvette-style warship fleet

https://amp.theaustralian.com.au/nation ... 5456e7ff15
The Australian can reveal 10 to 12 of the corvette-style ships, armed with missiles, canons, and potentially anti-submarine torpedoes, are being considered for a total price tag of about $5bn-$6bn.
Do they really think these will get here before the Hunters. They talk about the coalition stuffing defence with delays :crazy:

Better off going T31 to replace the Anzacs, 6more Hunters in AWD role forget Spanish AWD well the Hobarts to NZ

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by wargame_insomniac »

Can't read the article but they included picture of German corvettes, presumably designed to operate in the shallow waters of the Baltic. Not sure if this indicates a German shipbuilder rather than Navantia?

When PLAN started expanding from brown water to green and then blue water navy, they initially started building approx 50 Corvettes IIRC, mainly for ASW role near the Chinese maiinland. I don't know how deep the East China Sea and South China Sea are - I am presuming because of the numerous small islands / reefs / shallows in the latter, that these PLAN corvetttes were ideally suited to their littoral environment.

As others have said before, when discussing why the RN doesn't field such ships, just because they suit the Germans and Chinese, doesn't mean they would suit the RAN.

I know Australia does have huge long coastline bordering several oceans and seas. From what I remember from watching wildlife programmes, that the sea level drops off very quickly not far out, with some exceptions if course e.g. Great Barrier Reef.

So although I could the merits of numerous small ships, along with any associated UAV / USV / USUV, being useful to cover such a long coastline, I am not sure they would be as suited to deeper waters around Australia?

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2783
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Caribbean »

IIRC, one of the original requirements from the Australian collaboration in what became the T21 (and the reason that it ended up getting sonar) was for a smaller shallow-water vessel for operations around the "East Indian" islands (the sonar was for detecting FACs, not submarines), so I guess a modern "corvette" would be for more of the same.
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1409
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by tomuk »

Well there is a large number of islands between Australia and the South China Sea, Malaysia, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea etc. maybe a shallower draft corvette would be useful there, better to keep the enemy at range than let them up to home waters.
These users liked the author tomuk for the post (total 2):
CaribbeanScimitar54

Zeno
Member
Posts: 170
Joined: 12 Jun 2022, 02:24
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Zeno »

Sometimes it can be confusing in that certain media will promote their own agendas in regard to what Australia should acquire in regards to military purchases e.g. The Australian ,The Strategist

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5657
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by SW1 »

The Australians know from history the importance of the Malay archipelago to there defence as that is were the attacks on Darwin were launched from in ww2. Could corvettes be used there probably, though as the reconfiguration of the us marine corps is largely are defending such places by pushing out an air and surface bubble perhaps aligning more with that strategy maybe a better direction especially as I believe the us marines are setting up shop in Darwin.

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

Zeno wrote: 12 Oct 2022, 22:14 Sometimes it can be confusing in that certain media will promote their own agendas in regard to what Australia should acquire in regards to military purchases e.g. The Australian ,The Strategist
Yes, I wouldn't read too much into some of these stories. The guy in the next cubicle is probably advocating B-21s and the guy next to him is furiously typing up his "Second Look at Aircraft Carriers" post, now that there is a hint of a little extra money.

A lot of the time, frankly, I think they do these articles just to get eyeballs on their thinktank's website, rather than any considered organisational strategy. Always fun to build wishlists though.

Small, SSM armed, fast attack craft – possibly unmanned – that, I could get behind! :mrgreen: :wave:

Zeno
Member
Posts: 170
Joined: 12 Jun 2022, 02:24
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Zeno »

Still a bit more informed than many journalists who are more comfortable in gossip columns lol ,some of the U.K members here have own in the media there

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5550
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Tempest414 »

Well if the RAN are looking for something to push there patrols out then maybe a River B2+ would be a good fit say a RB2 fitted with a 3D radar plus 1 x 57mm and 2 x 25mm and Pods for other tasks

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Lord Jim »

How about the RN and RAN working together on a RB3 to fulfil the role in both Navy's.

Mercator
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »


GarethDavies1
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: 26 May 2021, 11:45
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by GarethDavies1 »

That was quick, puts UK in the shade
These users liked the author GarethDavies1 for the post:
Lord Jim

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2322
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

GarethDavies1 wrote: 17 Oct 2022, 14:08 That was quick, puts UK in the shade

Wish they hurry up with the tracked decision
These users liked the author R686 for the post (total 3):
ZenoMercatorLord Jim

Post Reply