Re: Future Solid Support Ship
Posted: 15 Sep 2021, 07:33
Don’t know. There’s a lack of capacity and workforce in the UK. Which is precisely why Navantia think they have a hope.Poiuytrewq wrote:So what is the realistic alternative?
News, History, Discussions and Debates on UK Defence.
https://ukdefenceforum.net/
Don’t know. There’s a lack of capacity and workforce in the UK. Which is precisely why Navantia think they have a hope.Poiuytrewq wrote:So what is the realistic alternative?
But isn’t building that workforce and capacity the objective of the Ship Building Strategy?RichardIC wrote:Don’t know. There’s a lack of capacity and workforce in the UK. Which is precisely why Navantia think they have a hope.Poiuytrewq wrote:So what is the realistic alternative?
Its either Belfast or Birkenhead as I really don't think Rosyth has the capacity with the T31/T32 builds.RichardIC wrote:Don’t know. There’s a lack of capacity and workforce in the UK. Which is precisely why Navantia think they have a hope.
Cammell certainly can't handle the financial risk and they'd never pass financial standing tests on a contract that size. The RRS build nearly wiped them out and they've said they would only take a risk like that again if they had a major backer which is why they need BAE and Babcock. There also needs to be relevant design expertise.Poiuytrewq wrote:Its either Belfast or Birkenhead as I really don't think Rosyth has the capacity with the T31/T32 builds.
Can Cammell Laird handle 3 FSS within a tight schedule and on budget?
Why would anyone think Navantia has the slightest interest in creating a competitor?Poiuytrewq wrote:IMO, if handled correctly Navantia's involvement could be just what UK commercial shipbuilding needs to get back up and running.
So again, what is the realistic alternative?Ron5 wrote:I am 100% sure their proposal will be to have Spanish ship builders live in Belfast for the duration of any assembly. Sure, local folks will be employed for the low skill jobs but when the Spaniards go home at the end of the contract, the shipyard will have exactly the same ability to build a ship as they do now. And that's a big fat zero.
The design concept is coming from Rolls Royce its based on the Enviroship like HMNZS Aotearoa. BAE do the detail design and Cammell Laird build them. I suppose Babcock spread the risk and can bring in the isupport asset/platform management stuff.RichardIC wrote:Poiuytrewq wrote:Its either Belfast or Birkenhead as I really don't think Rosyth has the capacity with the T31/T32 builds.
Can Cammell Laird handle 3 FSS within a tight schedule and on budget?Cammell certainly can't handle the financial risk and they'd never pass financial standing tests on a contract that size. The RRS build nearly wiped them out and they've said they would only take a risk like that again if they had a major backer which is why they need BAE and Babcock. There also needs to be relevant design expertise.Poiuytrewq wrote:Its either Belfast or Birkenhead as I really don't think Rosyth has the capacity with the T31/T32 builds.
Can Cammell Laird handle 3 FSS within a tight schedule and on budget?
I've got a feeling there's some bed-hopping to be done.
What nationality are the workers in your proposal? What do they do when the contract is finished?Lord Jim wrote:We should follow the example Germany has set with its new frigates being built by Damen. That company has had to build the ships in a German yard in close co-operation with its German partner. At least 70% of the value of the contract for the four frigates must be spent in Germany including all subsystems and so on.
In the case of the SSS, this could mean that the blocks delivered from Spain would be bare bones and require completion in the UK including fitting out before being joined in the assembly dock. Navantia would be working with it UK partners in the design and programme organisation and management but the majority of the work would be in the UK. It would be more like the T-26 programme in reverse with us building a Navantia design in the UK with UK alterations.
Team UK.Poiuytrewq wrote:So again, what is the realistic alternative?Ron5 wrote:I am 100% sure their proposal will be to have Spanish ship builders live in Belfast for the duration of any assembly. Sure, local folks will be employed for the low skill jobs but when the Spaniards go home at the end of the contract, the shipyard will have exactly the same ability to build a ship as they do now. And that's a big fat zero.
The existing German workforce at the Yard which has built warships for the German Navy fairly recently. Would struggle to match that in more than 1 location, but will any of the bidders be willing to train an entirely UK workforce for an order of 3 ships with nothing certain to follow? Possibly a core of foreign workers to mentor their UK counterparts, I do not know, but if the contract stipulates a UK workforce, I fear it may get bogged down in red tape before any production contract is struck. Which UK yards currently have a skilled workforce able to build the SSS by the way?Ron5 wrote:What nationality are the workers in your proposal? What do they do when the contract is finished?
The Government has made clear that a substantial part of the build will be conducted in the UK, there is a requirement to integrate all ships in a UK shipyard. In addition Social Value will represent a significant proportion of the evaluation of the bids.jonas wrote:Parliamentary written answers 23rd Sept 2021:- Still ambiguity rules !
https://questions-statements.parliament ... 9-20/51615
I assume that company would also become financially responsible for any contract problems. So would need deep pockets.donald_of_tokyo wrote: 3: The contract will be awarded to a UK firm acting solely or as part of a consortium
So much for the nonsense that all bids must be headed by a UK company.
Yes, will be interesting interesting see what that bid proposes in order to make it compliamt with being substantially/majority UK plc.Ron5 wrote:So much for the nonsense that all bids must be headed by a UK company.
Things like the quadropter Malloy T400 and T650 are a long way off achieving the specified range but do have the ability to carry significant loads and VTOL.Repulse wrote: ↑25 Jun 2022, 17:28 https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-look ... -lift-uav/
Perhaps we should be building our Future Solid Supply Ships with flat-tops…