Littoral Response Groups North & South
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4111
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Littoral Response Groups North & South
Game on.
- These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post (total 5):
- mrclark303 • wargame_insomniac • serge750 • Repulse • donald_of_tokyo
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Yay, they’ve put three Merlin on RFA Argus. Game on!
- These users liked the author RichardIC for the post (total 2):
- Repulse • jedibeeftrix
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
That was expected wasn’t it? Have seen any Wildcats yet, but would hope for atleast one may be two - well within Argus’s capabilities (could’ve added an Apache or two also )
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5634
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Well LRG-S is starting to looking like a nice balance across the 2 ships with the Bay carrying 1 x LSU of 250 troops with Jackal's , M Razor's , MAN logistics trucks and Landing craft and Argus carrying a Med centre and 3 x Merlin's so far
What I would like to see now is say 4 x Wildcats 2 on each ship with one held on armed QRA 24/7
LRG-S looks good able to carry out a wide range of tasks in the Indo-Pacific plus able to take surge units for short ops weather this be Medical staff or a second LSU or at a push by the Gulf based Bay with a third LSU plus ASW Merlin's however this last group would need to work under the cover of a USN , French or Indian CSG if ours is not there
What I would like to see now is say 4 x Wildcats 2 on each ship with one held on armed QRA 24/7
LRG-S looks good able to carry out a wide range of tasks in the Indo-Pacific plus able to take surge units for short ops weather this be Medical staff or a second LSU or at a push by the Gulf based Bay with a third LSU plus ASW Merlin's however this last group would need to work under the cover of a USN , French or Indian CSG if ours is not there
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4111
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Operation HIGHBROW in 2006 is a very interesting comparison.
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5634
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Evacuation of British Nationals in the Eastern Med could be the first big test of LRG-S covered the RAF from Aki
As for if the LSU is embarked we know it is as we have seen all the kit loaded
As for if the LSU is embarked we know it is as we have seen all the kit loaded
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4111
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Agreed. Two ships looks proportionate.Tempest414 wrote: ↑12 Oct 2023, 09:39 Well LRG-S is starting to looking like a nice balance across the 2 ships…
It will be interesting to see if a LHD and Joint Logistics Ellida style vessel looks optimal or if a pair of Damen Enforcer 14428 looks like a better mix.
….a second LSU or at a push by the Gulf based Bay with a third LSU plus ASW Merlin's however this last group would need to work under the cover of a USN , French or Indian CSG if ours is not there
As the concept is scalable it’s a question of finding the base level and top level of capability required.
The double and triple LSU surge capability is very important. The highly valuable ASW capability is often under discussed also.
The LHA capability is easy to dismiss as unnecessary and unaffordable but is it more important than a triple LSU capacity? Is it more important than a joint replenishment capability?
Hopefully this first deployment for LRG(S) will start to answer some of these questions.
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
We already have an HMS Argus and Merlin threads.
Groups should be in the Deployments section. Groups are not a specific Equipment section thread.
Please merge or delete this thread.
Groups should be in the Deployments section. Groups are not a specific Equipment section thread.
Please merge or delete this thread.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4111
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Its a General Discussion thread discussing the tactical and strategic significance of the LRGs, the equipment involved and how the evolving requirements may influence the Amphibious fleet replacements.
If you want to add another thread to the Deployment section carry-on.
- These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post (total 2):
- new guy • Jensy
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Yes isn’t it at the time the navy’s high readiness taskgroup.
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5634
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Well the QE CSG is at sea now I am sure if she is needed she can be surged with a SSN more F-35's plus Chinooks and Apache's
But yes LRG-S is the high readiness LRG but I am sure that if needed Albion could be made ready in short time in fact if it was me in charge I would have recalled her crew and started restocking her
But yes LRG-S is the high readiness LRG but I am sure that if needed Albion could be made ready in short time in fact if it was me in charge I would have recalled her crew and started restocking her
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4111
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Why Albion?Tempest414 wrote: ↑12 Oct 2023, 16:53 Well the QE CSG is at sea now I am sure if she is needed she can be surged with a SSN more F-35's plus Chinooks and Apache's
But yes LRG-S is the high readiness LRG but I am sure that if needed Albion could be made ready in short time in fact if it was me in charge I would have recalled her crew and started restocking her
Argus and Lyme Bay look like a good fit with a second Bay joining if required.
Does Argus add anything from HADR perspective?
Also good that HMS Duncan and SNMG2 are operating in the area.
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Personally can’t see us getting involved in the need to remove civilians provided the airports are operating and the uk sovereign bases are ever present in the region.Poiuytrewq wrote: ↑12 Oct 2023, 17:07Why Albion?Tempest414 wrote: ↑12 Oct 2023, 16:53 Well the QE CSG is at sea now I am sure if she is needed she can be surged with a SSN more F-35's plus Chinooks and Apache's
But yes LRG-S is the high readiness LRG but I am sure that if needed Albion could be made ready in short time in fact if it was me in charge I would have recalled her crew and started restocking her
Argus and Lyme Bay look like a good fit with a second Bay joining if required.
Does Argus add anything from HADR perspective?
Also good that HMS Duncan and SNMG2 are operating in the area.
An aircraft carrier an lpd, 2 destroyers a frigate and stores ship the last time there was major issues in this part of the world but this time 2 RFAs and maybe a destroyer are a gd fit?
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
From The Times (£):
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/9d3a ... 7e1e198a25
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/9d3a ... 7e1e198a25
Also, in response to suggestions that Ben Guion and Ramon Airports are operating normally:Britain will send two Royal Navy ships to the Eastern Mediterranean and begin surveillance flights over Israel in a show of military support designed to reassure its ally, the Times understands.
Two Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels, RFA Argus and RFA Lyme Bay, will be sent to the region as part of a littoral response group after the government announced it would begin laying on evacuation flights.
There are limited ways to leave Israel after Ben Gurion airport was caught up in rocket fire earlier this week. Major airlines have stopped flying to Israel and a British Airways plane returned to London after aborting an attempt to land in Tel Aviv on Friday. There are believed to be 60,000 British nationals in Israel and Gaza.
- These users liked the author Jensy for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
The airports don t need to be operating normally they just need to be operating then the FCO can charter flights.Jensy wrote: ↑12 Oct 2023, 17:49 From The Times (£):
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/9d3a ... 7e1e198a25
Also, in response to suggestions that Ben Guion and Ramon Airports are operating normally:Britain will send two Royal Navy ships to the Eastern Mediterranean and begin surveillance flights over Israel in a show of military support designed to reassure its ally, the Times understands.
Two Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels, RFA Argus and RFA Lyme Bay, will be sent to the region as part of a littoral response group after the government announced it would begin laying on evacuation flights.
There are limited ways to leave Israel after Ben Gurion airport was caught up in rocket fire earlier this week. Major airlines have stopped flying to Israel and a British Airways plane returned to London after aborting an attempt to land in Tel Aviv on Friday. There are believed to be 60,000 British nationals in Israel and Gaza.
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5634
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
So what Albion brings is 4 x LCU's and 4 x LCVP's plus stores and space for the evacuation of UK nationals .Poiuytrewq wrote: ↑12 Oct 2023, 17:07Why Albion?Tempest414 wrote: ↑12 Oct 2023, 16:53 Well the QE CSG is at sea now I am sure if she is needed she can be surged with a SSN more F-35's plus Chinooks and Apache's
But yes LRG-S is the high readiness LRG but I am sure that if needed Albion could be made ready in short time in fact if it was me in charge I would have recalled her crew and started restocking her
Argus and Lyme Bay look like a good fit with a second Bay joining if required.
Does Argus add anything from HADR perspective?
Also good that HMS Duncan and SNMG2 are operating in the area.
The UK milltary should not get involved in this. Its job should ONLY BE the evacuation of UK nationals from a degrading war zone
Second to its main role Argus should also be used to treat badly wounded Garzan women and children only
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67095846
The UK will send surveillance aircraft and two Royal Navy ships to the eastern Mediterranean in plans “to support Israel", No 10 says.
The aircraft will begin patrols tomorrow to "track threats to regional stability such as the transfer of weapons to terrorist groups".
The package includes surveillance assets, helicopters, P8 aircraft, and a company of marines. Rishi Sunak said the military support would "prevent further escalation".
The British armed forces will be on standby to "deliver practical support to Israel and partners in the region, and offer deterrence and assurance", Downing Street said.
The UK will send surveillance aircraft and two Royal Navy ships to the eastern Mediterranean in plans “to support Israel", No 10 says.
The aircraft will begin patrols tomorrow to "track threats to regional stability such as the transfer of weapons to terrorist groups".
The package includes surveillance assets, helicopters, P8 aircraft, and a company of marines. Rishi Sunak said the military support would "prevent further escalation".
The British armed forces will be on standby to "deliver practical support to Israel and partners in the region, and offer deterrence and assurance", Downing Street said.
-
- Member
- Posts: 366
- Joined: 03 May 2015, 13:56
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
I think getting some Rapier or Sky Sabre batteries to Akrotiri and potentially beefing up the fast jet deployment would be sensible. If rockets / drones / ballistic missiles etc start flying all over the region such that the US decide to directly get involved, the odds are Akrotiri will have some kind of a role; even if just used for emergency diverts it could be seen as a target and people already fighting the US might well conclude they have very little to lose at that point by also fighting the UK.
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Completely agree that the role of these ships should be humanitarian, but they can also offer capabilities to help police the Littoral area against other non-state groups getting involved.Tempest414 wrote: ↑12 Oct 2023, 18:14 So what Albion brings is 4 x LCU's and 4 x LCVP's plus stores and space for the evacuation of UK nationals .
The UK milltary should not get involved in this. Its job should ONLY BE the evacuation of UK nationals from a degrading war zone
Second to its main role Argus should also be used to treat badly wounded Garzan women and children only
It will be interesting how this mix of ships matches up with what is needed as part of the broader UK assets deployed. This is exactly the kind of role that forward based response unit(s) should be able to do. The fact that they are RFA should also allow them to be clearly non offensive combatants - it is important that the line between the RN and RFA is maintained exactly for this reason.
I would argue though that LCUs are much less important we are landing supply trucks or evacuating UK nationals over a beach - it will be helicopters if needed (though most will be via flights).
Information seems sparse on how many LCVPs there are in the group, 2 definitely on the Bay, but Argus can also support LCVPs via its deck crane, so hopefully 2 more. Also, I would hope that there is a Wildcat or two in the group also - this would be critical to help support the surveillance of the Littoral region and provide group security.
- These users liked the author Repulse for the post:
- wargame_insomniac
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
I think people are living in an alternate universe.
Do you think anyone outside this very narrow defence bubble knows the difference between the Royal Navy and the royal fleet auxiliary?
Even the media here have been reporting the deployment of two Royal Navy ships they can’t tell the difference, not a mission those in he region care or even acknowledge the difference!
If they were to evacuate people by ship it will be from a pier not a beach. They arent putting these or helicopter’s anywhere near Gaza or the hostage situation would be worse than it is now.
Argus isn’t manned or configured as a hospital ship its a royal marine assault platform. So it would be much different to any other ship unless she is reconfiguring in Gibraltar.
Do you think anyone outside this very narrow defence bubble knows the difference between the Royal Navy and the royal fleet auxiliary?
Even the media here have been reporting the deployment of two Royal Navy ships they can’t tell the difference, not a mission those in he region care or even acknowledge the difference!
If they were to evacuate people by ship it will be from a pier not a beach. They arent putting these or helicopter’s anywhere near Gaza or the hostage situation would be worse than it is now.
Argus isn’t manned or configured as a hospital ship its a royal marine assault platform. So it would be much different to any other ship unless she is reconfiguring in Gibraltar.
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5634
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Firstly if we want to re-role Argus we can do so in Cyprus it is a matter of flying out Medical staff and suppliesSW1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2023, 09:06 I think people are living in an alternate universe.
Do you think anyone outside this very narrow defence bubble knows the difference between the Royal Navy and the royal fleet auxiliary?
Even the media here have been reporting the deployment of two Royal Navy ships they can’t tell the difference, not a mission those in he region care or even acknowledge the difference!
If they were to evacuate people by ship it will be from a pier not a beach. They arent putting these or helicopter’s anywhere near Gaza or the hostage situation would be worse than it is now.
Argus isn’t manned or configured as a hospital ship its a royal marine assault platform. So it would be much different to any other ship unless she is reconfiguring in Gibraltar.
Second we are not putting ether of the RFA's on a pier in this degrading area so landing craft will need to shuttle and maybe re- role a River B2 to the area to act as a armed shuttle
Thirdly as I said the UK should not get involved apart from giving support to UK nationals and wounded Grazan Women and Children
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Probably not, but that’s a problem because the Politicians do not know the difference either and the options such a distinction can give - does not make it wrong. The real problem is that the Navy seems to want to remove the distinction also - I suspect out of manpower desperation, but it is a dangerous and incorrect path.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Would it be any different if UK had a dedicated hospital ship for HADR and paid for and crewed out of Foriegn Aid budget?Repulse wrote: ↑13 Oct 2023, 18:13Probably not, but that’s a problem because the Politicians do not know the difference either and the options such a distinction can give - does not make it wrong. The real problem is that the Navy seems to want to remove the distinction also - I suspect out of manpower desperation, but it is a dangerous and incorrect path.
I believe would have to be completely unarmed for such a hospital ship to be able to be painted white with red cross symbols.
Re: Littoral Response Groups North & South
Yes it would be different, a different role and capability. Not saying the UK shouldn’t have a civilian hospital ship (might come in handy in UK waters reducing waiting times), but that’s not what’s required in this scenario IMO, better to get safe corridors to get the sick and wounded out to hospitals on land.wargame_insomniac wrote: ↑13 Oct 2023, 18:21 Would it be any different if UK had a dedicated hospital ship for HADR and paid for and crewed out of Foriegn Aid budget?
I believe would have to be completely unarmed for such a hospital ship to be able to be painted white with red cross symbols.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston