USA Armed Forces
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: USA Armed Forces
As the Growlers will be flying for much longer (and have high parts commonality with the underlying SH), the above news does not deliver an immediate 'killer blow' to the two in those intl competitions where they are partaking.
However, may raise doubts as to for how long the SH will keep evolving and some may want to hedge their tech bets by buying a mix of the two.
However, may raise doubts as to for how long the SH will keep evolving and some may want to hedge their tech bets by buying a mix of the two.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: USA Armed Forces
The Super Hornet/Growler combo is the USN's way of hedging its bets regarding the F-35C and its next generation platform. I can see the USN's Carriers operating three Squadrons of Super Hornets and only one Squadron of F-35Cs until the Next Generation platform either manned, unmanned or both arrives and gradually replaces the Rhinos. This would mean the USN including the USMC will order significantly less F-35Cs and it will only have replaced half the fleet of legacy Hornets with the Super Horner replacing the rest. The latest upgrade programme that has just got going gives the USN a reliable, effective platform for the majority of its missions, especially when supported by Growlers that have also gong through an ongoing upgrade programme.
The USN's next Generation programme maybe progressing at a slower pace to that of the USAF, but the results will be very similar, with a tow tier force that is able to carry out the mission required from both services.
The USN's next Generation programme maybe progressing at a slower pace to that of the USAF, but the results will be very similar, with a tow tier force that is able to carry out the mission required from both services.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: USA Armed Forces
A snippet from an end-of-April USNI panel:
"The Navy is expected to add two Aegis destroyers to the four already at Naval Station Rota in Spain in the future, partially in response to stepped-up Russian naval activity."
Naval activity includes the bombers in Syria, capable of carrying hypersonic AShMs.
"The Navy is expected to add two Aegis destroyers to the four already at Naval Station Rota in Spain in the future, partially in response to stepped-up Russian naval activity."
Naval activity includes the bombers in Syria, capable of carrying hypersonic AShMs.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: USA Armed Forces
They must be serious as two have been bought outright
https://euro-sd.com/2021/05/news/indust ... 23005/srt/
CT models of Humvee could be facing new duties (a rebirth, on their way out?)
https://euro-sd.com/2021/05/news/indust ... 23005/srt/
CT models of Humvee could be facing new duties (a rebirth, on their way out?)
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: USA Armed Forces
Janes is reporting the USN have revealed the home port for the first dozen Constellation class frigates will be US Naval Station Everett (up near Seattle). NS Everett lost their last frigate (FFG-60) in 2015. The author describes how this is another example of the US deploying brand new equipment in response to China.
What isn't mentioned in the article (but is probably related) is that it's about 30mi away across the sound from Naval Station Bangor which is the home port to the Pacific SSBN fleet.
What isn't mentioned in the article (but is probably related) is that it's about 30mi away across the sound from Naval Station Bangor which is the home port to the Pacific SSBN fleet.
Re: USA Armed Forces
I'm guessing that this might be good news for the Voyager/A330 MRTT/KC-45.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4 ... ady-buying
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4 ... ady-buying
Re: USA Armed Forces
Hahaha Boeing is in an even bigger financial and engineering mess than after September 11 when they were handed the p8 bailout, this will be the government bailout for them this time.
Re: USA Armed Forces
But they can't get theirs to work at the moment so are they going to use the Airbus designed Boom etc. I cannot see the USAF being allowed to buy the whole Airbus package including the plane itself, too much humble pie for the "Hill", to cope with there.
Re: USA Armed Forces
The problem is MRTT is the only functional OTS option that USAF can really buy* (and manufacture in CONUS) unless they want to start a brand new development program, but they aren't exactly flush with cash either at the momentLord Jim wrote:But they can't get theirs to work at the moment so are they going to use the Airbus designed Boom etc. I cannot see the USAF being allowed to buy the whole Airbus package including the plane itself, too much humble pie for the "Hill", to cope with there.
*assuming KC-390 is too small and Boeing told them to get stuffed anyway
Re: USA Armed Forces
It will be sold as the A330 is bigger than 767. So the will waffle something about different sizes for different roles.
Re: USA Armed Forces
Which may have some justification behind it, there's a case to be made that A330 means existing infrastructure will struggle to accommodate the aircraft (it is some 50ft longer and 70ft wider than a KC-135). I'm not sure how real of a case exists from my own ignorance, but it's probably not inconsequential.Clive F wrote:It will be sold as the A330 is bigger than 767. So the will waffle something about different sizes for different roles.
But the USAF is actively trimming down their KC-10 fleet alongside KC-135 (14 KC-10 in FY22 budget).
Size may not be a viable justification anymore as the available numbers of KC-10 trends downwards and KC-46 can't meet that capacity. From Wiki, KC-10 carries some 365,000lbs of gas compared to the 200,000lbs of the KC-135 (or the 207,000lbs of KC-46). As KC-10 is removed from inventory - and KC-46 continues to underperform - then they are going to lose significant amounts of refuelling capacity.
The Pacific is pretty big so the demand is only likely to go up, but I expect if you spoke to a tanker guy (or someone who knows more than me) that whole rambling might be too simplistic.
Re: USA Armed Forces
As previously discussed a question was would the R.N do similar tests on their carriers or stick to computer simulations
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: USA Armed Forces
No I can't see it we only have 2 and we need to work them up however if it was to be done then just before the first refit would be the time
Re: USA Armed Forces
https://www.forbes.com/sites/craighoope ... ssion=true
The Navy’s new shipbuilding plan, released in mid-June, telegraphs enormous cuts to America’s large surface combatant fleet of cruisers and destroyers. The mild verbiage from the report, saying “that growing the small surface combatant force enables reductions in the quantity of large surface combatants while yielding a more distributed and lethal force,” masks a likely brutal downsizing.
The cuts are widespread, but one place the axe falls hardest is upon the Navy’s large surface combatant fleet. First, the Department of Defense will force the Navy to eliminate the entire 22-hull Ticonderoga Class cruiser fleet. But even that drastic cut is not enough for the Navy to get to the Department of Defense’s current projection of 63 to 65 ships. With 88 Arleigh Burkes in service, under construction or already authorized, Arleigh Burke destroyer procurement will likely cease and 27 older Flight I, Flight IA and Flight II Burkes will be ushered out of the fleet.
The Navy’s new shipbuilding plan, released in mid-June, telegraphs enormous cuts to America’s large surface combatant fleet of cruisers and destroyers. The mild verbiage from the report, saying “that growing the small surface combatant force enables reductions in the quantity of large surface combatants while yielding a more distributed and lethal force,” masks a likely brutal downsizing.
The cuts are widespread, but one place the axe falls hardest is upon the Navy’s large surface combatant fleet. First, the Department of Defense will force the Navy to eliminate the entire 22-hull Ticonderoga Class cruiser fleet. But even that drastic cut is not enough for the Navy to get to the Department of Defense’s current projection of 63 to 65 ships. With 88 Arleigh Burkes in service, under construction or already authorized, Arleigh Burke destroyer procurement will likely cease and 27 older Flight I, Flight IA and Flight II Burkes will be ushered out of the fleet.
Re: USA Armed Forces
But what will replace them. The Navy got its finger burnt with the LCS, so until a viable replacement with a mature design starts to enter service I think the existing ships will soldier on. Regarding the ABs, they could end up being the biggest escort left followed by the planned Constitution class, but I think they will keep building latest version replacing the original ones with no helicopter facilities. Just my thoughts on this.
Re: USA Armed Forces
Reports seem to be surfacing that the USAF want to turn the B-1B into a Gunship with air to ground cannon in its weapons bays! These would be interchangeable with normal loads, but the Gunship proposals seem to be from the US Army who want better CAS that that provided by precision guided bombs from such platforms. A contract to study the feasibility is said to have been let so this could be something to keep any eye on or just a passing idea that has only a short shelf life.
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: USA Armed Forces
Will this be the Constellation class ( FREMM) you are looking for don't they start building in the summerLord Jim wrote:until a viable replacement with a mature design starts to enter service
Re: USA Armed Forces
The impression I get is that they are looking at something smaller than the Constitution class, maybe the same size as the LCS but not built of 40Kts and more balanced.
Re: USA Armed Forces
Impressive watercraft there, but it would be seen for a significant distance with a rooster tail like that when going at speed, limited only by the curvature of the earth. Mind you as a choke point ambusher, operating like WWII S-Boats, if armed it could be another useful addition tot eh growing toolbox of naval unmanned platforms.
Re: USA Armed Forces
Interesting update to navigation technology
https://www.newscientist.com/article/22 ... tic-field/
"A US Air Force jet that can navigate using tiny variations in Earth’s magnetic field will take a test flight next month. The technology could be used on aircraft as an alternative to GPS, which is easier to interfere with than magnetic field sensors.
The USAF’s Position, Navigation and Timing programme is using a combination of sensors in a modular AgilePod, a device that can be easily mounted beneath a plane. In the tests, the AgilePod will also carry cameras for visual navigation and equipment for radio navigation using transmitters with known locations such as TV masts. However, adding magnetic navigation is new."
https://www.newscientist.com/article/22 ... tic-field/
"A US Air Force jet that can navigate using tiny variations in Earth’s magnetic field will take a test flight next month. The technology could be used on aircraft as an alternative to GPS, which is easier to interfere with than magnetic field sensors.
The USAF’s Position, Navigation and Timing programme is using a combination of sensors in a modular AgilePod, a device that can be easily mounted beneath a plane. In the tests, the AgilePod will also carry cameras for visual navigation and equipment for radio navigation using transmitters with known locations such as TV masts. However, adding magnetic navigation is new."
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill