


Wikipedia:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starstreak
What is Rapid-Ranger?Tempest414 wrote: ↑10 Mar 2022, 16:16 I would like to see the Rapid-Ranger system based on a Bushmaster for our light BCT's for use as point air defence + HVM and LMM can be used against light armour to
This would be great for the Mec BCT's which would already have Boxer.Lord Jim wrote: ↑11 Mar 2022, 19:42 Build a new Mission Module for the Boxer with the turret and sensors from the Stormer HVM platform and problem solved. You end up with a more capable platform that is cheaper to maintain, has room for growth and can carry more rounds . Tag on a 30mm Chain Gun as used by the Apache and you have an even better vehicle.
A RUSSIAN helicopter has been blasted out of the sky by Ukrainian forces using a British missile for the first time. Dramatic footage shows the moment the Mi-28N is hit by the Starstreak in the Luhansk region of eastern Ukraine. The Starstreak is the world’s fastest surface-to-air missile and can travel at over four times the speed of sound.
Ministry of Defence sources said it’s the first time the missile has been used to bring down a Russian aircraft. In the video, the chopper can be seen skimming the treetops before it’s hit in the tail by the Starstreak. The missile can be seen lifting off through the trees towards its target.
We need to avoid any Israeli purchases in future. They've refused permission for Spike missiles to be sent as aid to Ukraine. Given that they're used by most of European NATO and Canada that has meant that most of NATO's nations have been unable to send ATGM...they need to be utterly removed as a NATO supplier for that.Tempest414 wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 10:46 Also just looking at Spike LR which is the same size and weight as Starstreak so if Thales could adapted the rapid ranger mount for Spike LR the Light motorized BCT's could have Bushmasters fitted the same mount rigged for either air defence or anti tank
My comments above are in context of the Light motorizied BCT's that would not and should not have Boxer in them. As Thales make both Bushmaster and Rapid Ranger a Air defence Bushmaster should be a simple thing and I am a little shocked they have not push it for Australia. The reason I was taking about Spike LR was it is the same weight and size as Starstreak there for would not unsettle the Rapid Ranger mount to much however looking at MMP it is only 1 kg heavier and 1 cm bigger than Starstreak so may work just as well the gun was a nice to have the main thing would be having a SP anti air and anti tank Bushmaster using a common mount and optics for the Light BCT'sTimmymagic wrote: ↑05 Apr 2022, 11:03We need to avoid any Israeli purchases in future. They've refused permission for Spike missiles to be sent as aid to Ukraine. Given that they're used by most of European NATO and Canada that has meant that most of NATO's nations have been unable to send ATGM...they need to be utterly removed as a NATO supplier for that.Tempest414 wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 10:46 Also just looking at Spike LR which is the same size and weight as Starstreak so if Thales could adapted the rapid ranger mount for Spike LR the Light motorized BCT's could have Bushmasters fitted the same mount rigged for either air defence or anti tank
MMP is more advanced and is partially made in the UK...a production line in the UK would be very easy to establish.
As for 30mm cannon...why not use the UK made 30mm Venom from AEI in the UK. It's a redesigned ADEN cannon and is lighter, a familiar weapon system to UK forces and fully made in the UK. Ammo is compatible with the Apache's chain gun...
But even then I'd be cautious, Airburst is absolutely required to deal with UAV's and Loitering Munitions, whilst 30mm airburst rounds have recently been trialed they're not going to have anywhere near the potential of 35mm up as a result of the limited bursting charge and fragmentation once the larger fusing is taken into account.
The irony of all this is we have a perfect 40mm weapon....and we own lots of them. 40mm CT. We ordered hundreds for Warrior that cost a fortune and will be going spare. The solution is really a turret on Boxer that utilises these and the trialed 40mm CT airburst round, add in a multi missile launcher for LMM, APKWS, Starstreak and Javelin and we could recover a lot of lost ground (the reason why I say Javelin is that we have this in stock, with better optics it can reach out to 4,000m rather than the current CLU limited 2,500m range. For dismounted we should switch to MMP.)
Got to say when I see missiles that are not in a maintenance free canister I have real concerns...
Handling loads and aerodynamic/inertial loads are quite different. On a plane you’re not likely to have so much in the way of bumps, scrapes and impacts compared to ground handling.
Transferring the missiles from the transport containers to the launch containers/mounts is much easier and safer on an airfield than somewhere in the outback.Lord Jim wrote: ↑07 Apr 2022, 13:49 Yes but the Missiles are transported and stored in Protected Transportation Containers, Sure once on the Hawkei they are exposed but if designed correctly, the Hawkei Chassis should protect the Missiles form the majority of knocks and scrapes, otherwise I am sure they would have chosen a different platform.
The reason why you don't see live missiles on anything other than QRA or combat missions is precisely because missiles are very susceptible to that sort of treatment. Flying hours on missiles are carefully monitored. Once a missile has gone over a certain number it needs recertifying or retiring for safety. Every time you drive over a bump in the road, or particularly drive cross country you're going to be putting strain on components. Lots of small g bumbs are ultimately just as bad as a few large g manoeuvres.
There's a pretty decent version of Giraffe that can do the same, plus lots of experience in the UK with people like Blighter. But ADADS works, an upgraded passive sensor is probably more important in the short term.
Also the kind of bumps associated with ground manoeuvre can be higher g, if shorter duration, compared to what you’d get on an aircraft.Timmymagic wrote: ↑11 Apr 2022, 21:40 Lots of small g bumbs are ultimately just as bad as a few large g manoeuvres.