New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Contains threads on Joint Service equipment of the past, present and future.
Online
User avatar
Jensy
Member
Posts: 699
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
Has liked: 220 times
Been liked: 86 times
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Jensy »

TheLoneRanger wrote: 22 Oct 2022, 12:14 Not sure how you can blamed "the current goverment" for the failures of the MOD to conduct a procurement programme that has gone horribly wrong for 30 years as indicated by Jensy...

The problem is the MOD ... their procurement ability sucks - just look at how effective tiny Israel is in their procurement programmes relative to the size of their MOD ....
I'm not sure I understand your post, or if it's even aimed at me...

It's quite easy to attack civil servants, and can at times be justifiable. However this is a programme that was started under this government, whose parameters, projected procurement numbers and budget were set by this government. Particularly by the MoD, led by Ben Wallace who has portrayed himself as 'the man to set right UK defence procurement'.

Industry responded, some companies more enthusiastically than others and a timetable for delivery was set.

We're now in a position where the programme is delayed, despite this being a fairly simple (in comparison to CASD, Tempest, Type 26 etc.) requirement.

I can't see any possible way to blame anyone but the government, whose ministers are responsible for the failures of their departments.

It might be one of the endless flow of chancellors leading the treasury, it might be Wallace and it might even be the department for BEIS. One way or another this is down to elected officials, not the 'Sir Humphreys' (incompetent or not). As I think my post makes clear, my finger is squarely pointed at those in charge of the MoD.

Israel delivers projects on time because they have existential threats that require efficient and world class delivery of platforms and systems. We're still living like it's the 90s/00s.

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 6431
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 32 times
United States of America

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Ron5 »

Jensy wrote: 22 Oct 2022, 21:53
TheLoneRanger wrote: 22 Oct 2022, 12:14 Not sure how you can blamed "the current goverment" for the failures of the MOD to conduct a procurement programme that has gone horribly wrong for 30 years as indicated by Jensy...

The problem is the MOD ... their procurement ability sucks - just look at how effective tiny Israel is in their procurement programmes relative to the size of their MOD ....
I'm not sure I understand your post, or if it's even aimed at me...

It's quite easy to attack civil servants, and can at times be justifiable. However this is a programme that was started under this government, whose parameters, projected procurement numbers and budget were set by this government. Particularly by the MoD, led by Ben Wallace who has portrayed himself as 'the man to set right UK defence procurement'.

Industry responded, some companies more enthusiastically than others and a timetable for delivery was set.

We're now in a position where the programme is delayed, despite this being a fairly simple (in comparison to CASD, Tempest, Type 26 etc.) requirement.

I can't see any possible way to blame anyone but the government, whose ministers are responsible for the failures of their departments.

It might be one of the endless flow of chancellors leading the treasury, it might be Wallace and it might even be the department for BEIS. One way or another this is down to elected officials, not the 'Sir Humphreys' (incompetent or not). As I think my post makes clear, my finger is squarely pointed at those in charge of the MoD.

Israel delivers projects on time because they have existential threats that require efficient and world class delivery of platforms and systems. We're still living like it's the 90s/00s.
Most likely cause is a Treasury mandated slowdown: "Postpone any discretionary spending UFN".
These users liked the author Ron5 for the post:
serge750

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7286
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
Has liked: 317 times
Been liked: 351 times
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Lord Jim »

The MoD is well known for implementing moratoriums to cut or reduce spending at little or no advance notice to the relevant departments.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 3598
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
Has liked: 130 times
Been liked: 316 times
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by SW1 »


jonas
Senior Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:20
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 47 times
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by jonas »

Leonardo and Sikorsky have also passed DPQQ.

Online
User avatar
Jensy
Member
Posts: 699
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
Has liked: 220 times
Been liked: 86 times
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Jensy »

jonas wrote: 02 Nov 2022, 09:06 Leonardo and Sikorsky have also passed DPQQ.
It seems the Bell and AceHawk didn't make the cut, with Boeing making it four over the line:
https://www.flightglobal.com/helicopter ... 79.article

Though I foundthis interesting:
Boeing’s interest in the requirement is unclear given the lack of a suitable aircraft in its range: the only medium helicopter it could offer is the MH-139, which is based on Leonardo’s best-selling AW139.

However, two sources suggest Boeing may instead be interested in the support and training elements of the procurement.
Considering there are already two AW139 production lines up and serving far large order books, I would be surprised if the offer of setting up another is on the table.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 3598
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
Has liked: 130 times
Been liked: 316 times
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by SW1 »

H175m video interview with test pilot

https://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video ... y=1&logo=0
These users liked the author SW1 for the post:
Little J

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 6431
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 32 times
United States of America

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Ron5 »

Brazen revolving door. I wonder if that is smart.

Little J
Member
Posts: 767
Joined: 02 May 2015, 14:35
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 34 times
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Little J »





The close air support configuration in that last video looks good with Brimstone :thumbup:

User avatar
Cooper
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: 01 May 2015, 08:11
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 31 times
Korea North

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Cooper »

I'm pretty sure this contract is for Augusta to lose.

It goes beyond just a helicopter contract, but also politics, in keeping Italy sweet on their continuing involvement with Tempest.

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 6431
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 32 times
United States of America

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Ron5 »

Cooper wrote: 24 Nov 2022, 10:44 I'm pretty sure this contract is for Augusta to lose.

It goes beyond just a helicopter contract, but also politics, in keeping Italy sweet on their continuing involvement with Tempest.
Not who has the most votes in the competing constituencies?

Little J
Member
Posts: 767
Joined: 02 May 2015, 14:35
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 34 times
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Little J »

Cooper wrote: 24 Nov 2022, 10:44 I'm pretty sure this contract is for Augusta to lose.

It goes beyond just a helicopter contract, but also politics, in keeping Italy sweet on their continuing involvement with Tempest.
The 149 & 175 are very evenly matched... It'll come down to politics.


On a personal, highly unimportant subject... The 149 is easier to look at :lol:
The 175 just looks a bit ungainly to me :shifty:
These users liked the author Little J for the post (total 2):
serge750Ron5

Post Reply