Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
There are 14 a/c with the RAF at present increasing to 18 a/c as the year progresses. The aircraft are receiving a number of upgrades and will continue to do so over the next year or so.
The a400 can and is now cleared for parachuting and is currently testing 16 tonne single load drops. The issues identified with long sticks of parachutes dropping from both doors simulatiously is not unique to a400m indeed the very same issues affect c17 and c130.
The a400m can actually operate out off all the same locations as c130 Hercules in fact the a400m will operate out of landing sites with softer ground than c130, thank to German specified cbr specs and a much better landing gear. RAF have been conducting landings down the beach recently.
There is an issue refuelling helicopters and testing is in place to offer a solution should that capability happen it will most likely require the receiver to remain plugged in longer than had been planned,
Why have we retained c130. Well we were always supposed to a400m was only supposed to replace half the c130 the other half being replaced by c130js. Why mainly cost we don't have the funds to replace all the c130s with a400m and it takes time to clear all the SF profiles and gear which is currently cleared on c130. Possible osprey replacement for c130 in the future may be of interest.
As for turbo jets / props. Props are more efficent if you plan to fly low level tactic sorties also FOD is a real issue with jet engines in unprepared surfaces. The abbresive materials on the compressor blades seriously degrade engine life expectancy. It's one of the reasons why c17 spends a week in the hanger for a service every time it conducts such a landing.
The a400 can and is now cleared for parachuting and is currently testing 16 tonne single load drops. The issues identified with long sticks of parachutes dropping from both doors simulatiously is not unique to a400m indeed the very same issues affect c17 and c130.
The a400m can actually operate out off all the same locations as c130 Hercules in fact the a400m will operate out of landing sites with softer ground than c130, thank to German specified cbr specs and a much better landing gear. RAF have been conducting landings down the beach recently.
There is an issue refuelling helicopters and testing is in place to offer a solution should that capability happen it will most likely require the receiver to remain plugged in longer than had been planned,
Why have we retained c130. Well we were always supposed to a400m was only supposed to replace half the c130 the other half being replaced by c130js. Why mainly cost we don't have the funds to replace all the c130s with a400m and it takes time to clear all the SF profiles and gear which is currently cleared on c130. Possible osprey replacement for c130 in the future may be of interest.
As for turbo jets / props. Props are more efficent if you plan to fly low level tactic sorties also FOD is a real issue with jet engines in unprepared surfaces. The abbresive materials on the compressor blades seriously degrade engine life expectancy. It's one of the reasons why c17 spends a week in the hanger for a service every time it conducts such a landing.
- The Armchair Soldier
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: 29 Apr 2015, 08:31
- Contact:
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
An A400M alongside two C-17s and a Voyager in Barbados to support aid delivery:
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
The Armchair Soldier wrote:An A400M alongside two C-17s and a Voyager in Barbados to support aid delivery:
must be an optical illusion A400 looks big and fat
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
If this hadn't been an EU project, at a time when the Government was keen to demonstrate our European credentials, would the RAF still have wanted this aircraft? or would they have been happy with the C130J/C17 mix?
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
I would say yes, but the engine would have been bought from Canada (the only one that was available off-the-shelf) and not chosen by a French President (based on a concept drawing) and thus the project would have been done and dusted years ago... and been a roaring success, rather than having been bailed out by the founder Gvmnts inserting semi-equity (on top of the guaranteed buy)james k wrote:would the RAF still have wanted this aircraft?
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
I must say they're a fine looking bird, they have a real chunky, solid looking appearance about them..
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Just got a book called "On Atlas' shoulders", flicking through, there was a proposal to get C-5 Galaxies back in the 70's. I wonder if that had succeeded, would there have been an A400 project as it is today?ArmChairCivvy wrote:I would say yes, but the engine would have been bought from Canada (the only one that was available off-the-shelf) and not chosen by a French President (based on a concept drawing) and thus the project would have been done and dusted years ago... and been a roaring success, rather than having been bailed out by the founder Gvmnts inserting semi-equity (on top of the guaranteed buy)james k wrote:would the RAF still have wanted this aircraft?
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
I'm not criticising the aircraft but for the life of me I can't see the point in it. The C130J and C17 fleet seemed capable of transporting pretty much everything required for the RAF to support the Army, predominantly 16 Air Assault Brigade, what new capability does the Atlas add?
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
They're always great at airshows too IMO, they appear to handle very well considering what she looks like and what the role is.Cooper wrote:I must say they're a fine looking bird, they have a real chunky, solid looking appearance about them..
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Army kit is getting bigger and fatter but you still want to carry it a long way and dump it into rough environments - C-17/C-130J do either to varying degrees but neither can do both at the adequate tempo that the Army would require in the future.james k wrote:I'm not criticising the aircraft but for the life of me I can't see the point in it. The C130J and C17 fleet seemed capable of transporting pretty much everything required for the RAF to support the Army, predominantly 16 Air Assault Brigade, what new capability does the Atlas add?
TD did an excellent series on the A400, recommend you give it a read. Section 2 addresses the problem behind kit growth quite nicely.
http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2012/09/t ... 7-options/
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
I doubt the C130 will be able to carry any new 8 wheeled vehicle for the Army and whilst the C17 could, it won't be able to land in all the same places as the Atlas.james k wrote:I'm not criticising the aircraft but for the life of me I can't see the point in it. The C130J and C17 fleet seemed capable of transporting pretty much everything required for the RAF to support the Army, predominantly 16 Air Assault Brigade, what new capability does the Atlas add?
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Do we need the C17 then? would more Atlas make more sense?
I doubt the C130 will be able to carry any new 8 wheeled vehicle for the Army and whilst the C17 could, it won't be able to land in all the same places as the Atlas.[/quote]
I doubt the C130 will be able to carry any new 8 wheeled vehicle for the Army and whilst the C17 could, it won't be able to land in all the same places as the Atlas.[/quote]
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Last of the 'white tail' (unsold) C17's has just been purchased by India, so that boat has sailed, and I've no doubt we'll buy more A400's as the C130 fleet is eventually retired.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Might be an opportunity to curry favour in the Brexit negotiations if we agree to take some off Germany from their back order....Cooper wrote:Last of the 'white tail' (unsold) C17's has just been purchased by India, so that boat has sailed, and I've no doubt we'll buy more A400's as the C130 fleet is eventually retired.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
The most serious one (backed by Germany, though they had no industrial participation in it) was to re-engine Antonovs - and redo the avionics - with RR enginesLittle J wrote:a proposal to get C-5 Galaxies back in the 70's. I wonder if that had succeeded, would there have been an A400 project as it is today?
- bang on the money there, and here there's a difference between the resilience (translates to round trips, translates to capacity) between jets and turbopropsCooper wrote:I doubt the C130 will be able to carry any new 8 wheeled vehicle for the Army and whilst the C17 could, it won't be able to land in all the same places as the Atlas.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
The 'Western Antonov' is still an awesome concept. It's payload / range puts the C-17 to shame.
@LandSharkUK
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Defence Minister Guto Bebb discusses the vital role that the new £70m hangar at RAF Brize Norton will play in maintaining the Royal Air Force Atlas A400M fleet and safeguarding the UK's essential defence capabilities
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
The Royal Air Force's Atlas A400M aircraft has successfully completed trials that will enable it to undertake air-sea rescue operations
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Written Answer says that final A400M Atlas delivery to the RAF is not expected before 2022. So, i take it that the UK has accepted (substantial) delays to delivery in the new Airbus deal. At one point deliveries were due to wrap up as soon as March 2018... http://qnadailyreport.blob.core.windows ... -02-27.pdf …
The UK currently has 18 of the 22 A400M Atlas it has ordered. 15 are in use, 3 are in Seville for a retrofit to "to bring them up to the latest capability standard", whatever that means today after the deal with Airbus watered everything down in undefined ways.
The UK currently has 18 of the 22 A400M Atlas it has ordered. 15 are in use, 3 are in Seville for a retrofit to "to bring them up to the latest capability standard", whatever that means today after the deal with Airbus watered everything down in undefined ways.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Indonesia to buy 2 A400M's
http://alert5.com/2018/03/08/indonesia- ... ove-goods/
Does anyone know the approximate UK workshare per A400M airframe?
http://alert5.com/2018/03/08/indonesia- ... ove-goods/
Does anyone know the approximate UK workshare per A400M airframe?
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
All of those in the original consortium (, which I believe has not been added to, unlike with the Eurofighter) have an interest - if they have flyable planes to fill the gap - to let export deliveries happen first.Gabriele wrote: i take it that the UK has accepted (substantial) delays to delivery in the new Airbus deal. At one point deliveries were due to wrap up as soon as March 2018...
- the couple of bn that had to pumped into the project, to keep it afloat, is only payable back from sales to non-consortium members. So how long do we want to keep our monies in the Airbus pocket - that's the question
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)