I was thinking more along the lines of inshore / harbour / mariner patrolling, though agree that a whole new class of midshore Patrol craft are required, something in the order of 25-30m with a small calibre gun capable of 40+kts.Engaging Strategy wrote:Better to leave them in the current navigation and command training role with flag flying and drumming up recruits through the URNUs as useful add-ons.
Border Force Cutters.
Re: Border Force Cutters.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
- Engaging Strategy
- Member
- Posts: 775
- Joined: 20 Dec 2015, 13:45
- Contact:
Re: Border Force Cutters.
Much better and cheaper options are available for that sort of thing. For inshore/harbor/marina patrol you want something smaller and more maneuverable than a P2000. The 15m patrol boats currently used by the MoD Police seem about right for that sort of work.Repulse wrote:I was thinking more along the lines of inshore / harbour / mariner patrolling, though agree that a whole new class of midshore Patrol craft are required, something in the order of 25-30m with a small calibre gun capable of 40+kts.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Blog: http://engagingstrategy.blogspot.co.uk
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Border Force Cutters.
would say most constabularies with a coastline should now look at a maritime unit or extending the scope of the BGA or Coastguard
Re: Border Force Cutters.
I was thinking about something like this: https://cmn-group.com/products-and-serv ... tor-hsi32/marktigger wrote:something like the STAN 4207 would be a good option
Or
https://cmn-group.com/products-and-serv ... ante-fs46/
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Border Force Cutters.
Like this?Repulse wrote:something in the order of 25-30m with a small calibre gun capable of 40+kts.
or the Greeks are using these to rescue migrants;
^ Damen Stan Patrol 5509, pretty much the new version of our cutters.
I don't think they have the resources to patrol our vast coast line.marktigger wrote:would say most constabularies with a coastline should now look at a maritime unit or extending the scope of the BGA or Coastguard
The border force does need expanding, perhaps with the options above, it shouldn't be the responsibility of the military. Smuggling and fishing is a local civilian responsibility.
The border force should also look at including some fixed wing light aircraft, perhaps the Britten-Norman Defender used by the police, which is already used for maritime surveillance.
Unfortunately our moat is no longer enough to keep us secure, we are going to have to stump up some more cash for the border force to keep the moat safe.
@LandSharkUK
- Engaging Strategy
- Member
- Posts: 775
- Joined: 20 Dec 2015, 13:45
- Contact:
Re: Border Force Cutters.
This article: http://www.dailypost.co.uk/business/bus ... ey-4924370 seems to indicate that those 15m police boats are just a hair under £1.2mn each and HMG bought the Damen 42m Customs cutters for around £5mn apiece (in 2016 money). So, for the price of the 3 new Batch II River class OPVs we could have bought a mixed fleet of 23 additional 42m cutters and 278 15m police patrol boats. Reckon that'd be enough to protect the UK's EEZ and inshore waters?
Blog: http://engagingstrategy.blogspot.co.uk
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
Re: Border Force Cutters.
The Rivers are over priced due to government poor planning, but to compare them to Cutters are comparing apples and pears.Engaging Strategy wrote:Reckon that'd be enough to protect the UK's EEZ and inshore waters?
The time when an unarmed police boat was all you needed to keep the moat safe is long gone. Terrorists are armed like small armies and to not be ready to deploy lethal force at a moment's notice is very foolhardy.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 31 May 2016, 18:22
Re: Border Force Cutters.
Why are the BF not armed? Why should they have to rely on the RN/ NCA to provide armed assistance when required. Surely it would be better to bring them up to Police AFO standard. Boarding any vessel has its issues but if the crew of the vessel do happen to be armed then at least the BF will have something to bite back with. Just a thought
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Border Force Cutters.
I think that depends on how you price the Rivers - wiki gives the price of the Becketts as 71m euros, so approx 54m GBP. The Rivers were 348m GBP for 3, but if you strip out the TOBA payment of approx 230m GBP, they come in at 39.3m GBP each. Of course, some of the cost of the build might have been covered by the TOBA payment, so who knows really?
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Border Force Cutters.
The whole class was for sale (for a price tag that prompted speculation about them ending up in some impoverished Baltic state) and we bought one (1!):
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home ... -coastline
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home ... -coastline
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Border Force Cutters.
Why duplicate the Royal Navy? The cheapest solution in my view would be to buy more ships and sailors and stop trying to duplicate what we have (but not enough of).Graham Swain wrote:Why are the BF not armed? Why should they have to rely on the RN/ NCA to provide armed assistance when required. Surely it would be better to bring them up to Police AFO standard.
According to the daily mail, in 2018 the Boarder Agency will get a new fleet of 20m semi rigid Boats. That is too late, and a MOD UOR should be issued for the fast interceptors I mentioned above. Also whilst I accept they are not perfect the P2000s should start patrolling now. Some people may say it's an over reaction, but given the recent terrorist incidents it's not a time for compliancy.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Border Force Cutters.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new- ... l-security
Apparently they will take the form of six 20 meter patrol boats, but the info is sketchy.
Does anyone know anything clearer ?
This is something I have been trying to piece together for a while now, apparently the border force are getting additional patrol boats, but there is very little info information on them.Patrol vessels will also be introduced, helping to intercept attempts to smuggle dangerous weapons, drugs and migrants into the country.
The first batch will be in place in the coming months, with all of the vessels operational by the end of next year. The vessels will add to the protection already offered by the Border Force cutters and Royal Navy vessels which patrol the UK coastline.
Apparently they will take the form of six 20 meter patrol boats, but the info is sketchy.
Does anyone know anything clearer ?
@LandSharkUK
Re: Border Force Cutters.
But they are also getting £31m (and 150 people) extra to counter tobacco smuggling.
I wonder what their priorities are?
I wonder what their priorities are?
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Border Force Cutters.
well a 20M boat is about same size as a p2000
and 150 people tasked to look at tabacco smuggling can also look at other smuggled items like people, drugs, guns etc
and 150 people tasked to look at tabacco smuggling can also look at other smuggled items like people, drugs, guns etc
- Galloglass
- Member
- Posts: 108
- Joined: 01 Apr 2016, 13:29
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Border Force Cutters.
just a shame we sold the last 3 to the philipines would have made great NIPS vessels
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Border Force Cutters.
Might be of interest;
£2.5 million per cutter per annum
Source; http://www.cornishguardian.co.uk/Border ... story.html
In 2014/15 the cutter fleet's annual running costs were approximately £12.3 million.
£2.5 million per cutter per annum
Source; http://www.cornishguardian.co.uk/Border ... story.html
@LandSharkUK
- Engaging Strategy
- Member
- Posts: 775
- Joined: 20 Dec 2015, 13:45
- Contact:
Re: Border Force Cutters.
Would be very interesting to see how much it costs to run a UKBF cutter annually "all in" including crew along with the other running costs. I think the major problem with putting the RN in the lead of UK EEZ patrol is that RN personnel are much more expensive to train and use in that role compared with their civilian counterparts.
I think there's definitely a role for patrol ships in the mould of the River class, able to operate in poor weather and high sea states, but operated by either the Border force or a "proper" coast guard. Maybe just have a handful of RN people aboard to maintain and operate the 30mm cannon.
I think there's definitely a role for patrol ships in the mould of the River class, able to operate in poor weather and high sea states, but operated by either the Border force or a "proper" coast guard. Maybe just have a handful of RN people aboard to maintain and operate the 30mm cannon.
Blog: http://engagingstrategy.blogspot.co.uk
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Border Force Cutters.
i wonder how many of the UKBF crews are Ex RN and the costs of their training has been picked up by the MoD already
-
Online
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Re: Border Force Cutters.
UKBF member do not need to deploy to the Gulf for 9 months. Good for one who wanna see his/her family every week.
Navy personnel do deploy for 9 months. I understand they see their family at the middle or only after they come back to Britain. Must be payed more, trained more (un danger place).
I do NOT agree the vessels on border defense must be heavily armed. No. It is a matter of intelligence gathering to identify if your "enemy" is equipped with no arms, only a pistol, a rifle, or RPGs, or even MANPADS. There is no justification arming all of your cutters with 3in gun. Better increase the number of cutters with that money.
Navy personnel do deploy for 9 months. I understand they see their family at the middle or only after they come back to Britain. Must be payed more, trained more (un danger place).
I do NOT agree the vessels on border defense must be heavily armed. No. It is a matter of intelligence gathering to identify if your "enemy" is equipped with no arms, only a pistol, a rifle, or RPGs, or even MANPADS. There is no justification arming all of your cutters with 3in gun. Better increase the number of cutters with that money.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Border Force Cutters.
donald_of_tokyo wrote:UKBF member do not need to deploy to the Gulf for 9 months. Good for one who wanna see his/her family every week.
Navy personnel do deploy for 9 months. I understand they see their family at the middle or only after they come back to Britain. Must be payed more, trained more (un danger place).
I do NOT agree the vessels on border defense must be heavily armed. No. It is a matter of intelligence gathering to identify if your "enemy" is equipped with no arms, only a pistol, a rifle, or RPGs, or even MANPADS. There is no justification arming all of your cutters with 3in gun. Better increase the number of cutters with that money.
no but they are doing allot of overtime protecting EU southern borders in the mediterranean
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Border Force Cutters.
They are certainly going above what is expected of the UK border force, it seems like excellent work.marktigger wrote:no but they are doing allot of overtime protecting EU southern borders in the mediterranean
Linking back to our earlier discussion Mark, this is the kind of role where endurance of a river class type is required. The cutters should be focusing on UK waters, allowing the rivers to contribute to maritime security beyond the channel in situations just like this.
@LandSharkUK
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Border Force Cutters.
A border force cutter cost's £2.5 million to operate per year, and each year the Marine Management Organisation pay's the MOD £8million for their fisheries protection duties.
Perhaps the MMO should go it alone with some 42m fisheries protection cutter's.
That would allow the Navy to focus on providing maritime security instead of checking fish.
Perhaps the MMO should go it alone with some 42m fisheries protection cutter's.
That would allow the Navy to focus on providing maritime security instead of checking fish.
@LandSharkUK