CANADA

News and discussion threads on defence in other parts of the world.
User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7785
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
Has liked: 100 times
Been liked: 298 times
England

Re: CANADA

Post by SKB »


inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 81 times

Re: CANADA

Post by inch »

Won't the french leaning Canada government just buy the french design that Australia was going to get ,the 12 Australian diesel boats design just going to France instead?

Jake1992
Senior Member
Posts: 1965
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 22:35
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 40 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by Jake1992 »

SKB wrote: 09 Apr 2023, 11:44
It’d be great if between the 3 of us ( USA, UK, Australia ) we could convince Canada to join the AUSUK SSN project with 30 odd subs ordered between the 3 smaller nations and the US ordering what every very large number they need.
These users liked the author Jake1992 for the post (total 2):
sunstersunwargame_insomniac

Zeno
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: 12 Jun 2022, 02:24
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 31 times
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by Zeno »

I understood an advantage of nuclear over conventional submarines was the safer under ice transits ,I'm not privy to Canadas submarine patrols of course ,but as Russia's nuclear submarine fleet have been known to broach the various ice in those regions , perhaps Canada should have an ability to patrol these approaches .
Perhaps instead of looking at conventional submarines from France inquire about the nuclear Barracuda class

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Has liked: 76 times
Been liked: 85 times
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by R686 »

inch wrote: 09 Apr 2023, 12:53 Won't the french leaning Canada government just buy the french design that Australia was going to get ,the 12 Australian diesel boats design just going to France instead?
Far as I know there were never detailed plans drawn up still had a long way to go.

Would be 100% French built id say, Macron would be overjoyed.

Zeno
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: 12 Jun 2022, 02:24
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 31 times
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by Zeno »

Well the door is shut on Canada joining AUKUS ,
https://www.naval-technology.com/featur ... sion-door/
Its hard of course to compare costs of developing a manufacturing industry for submarines when you only require a small number compared to buying off a production line ,I believe there should be a consideration of seeking to acquire the nuclear French Barracuda class , the costs quoted for France to acquire their submarines might be tempting if these unit prices were available to Canada, certainly a smaller submarine than the AUKUS variant with less manning could prove safer to operate under ice than a conventional submarine
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboo ... eas-193043

Zeno
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: 12 Jun 2022, 02:24
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 31 times
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by Zeno »

This thesis provides arguments for Canada acquiring nuclear submarines even providing estimations of cost comparisons
https://www.cfc.forces.gc.ca/259/290/40 ... ibchuk.pdf

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 2939
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 405 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by Timmymagic »

These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post:
wargame_insomniac

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 2939
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 405 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by Timmymagic »

Zeno wrote: 10 Apr 2023, 09:38 I believe there should be a consideration of seeking to acquire the nuclear French Barracuda class , the costs quoted for France to acquire their submarines might be tempting if these unit prices were available to Canada, certainly a smaller submarine than the AUKUS variant with less manning could prove safer to operate under ice than a conventional submarine
Has Barracuda been designed to operate under the ice though? I very much doubt it as the French have little experience with it...they very rarely ventured to the high north with their SSN to play with the big boys...

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7785
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
Has liked: 100 times
Been liked: 298 times
England

Re: CANADA

Post by SKB »

CAUKUS?
These users liked the author SKB for the post:
2HeadsBetter

Zeno
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: 12 Jun 2022, 02:24
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 31 times
Australia

Re: CANADA

Post by Zeno »

For Canada or especially its Prime minister to want to join would be the biggest about face since St Paul on the road to Damascus , I dont believe he wants to see the light

TheLoneRanger
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 01 Jul 2020, 19:15
Has liked: 95 times
Been liked: 96 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by TheLoneRanger »

Basically 5 eyes minus N. Zealand..

Online
Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2597
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
Has liked: 161 times
Been liked: 133 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by Caribbean »

So would that be "Four eyes"




.... I'll get my coat
These users liked the author Caribbean for the post:
serge750
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

User avatar
2HeadsBetter
Member
Posts: 189
Joined: 12 Dec 2015, 16:21
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 4 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by 2HeadsBetter »

Speculation?

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2822
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 6 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by abc123 »

Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

serge750
Member
Posts: 926
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:34
Has liked: 656 times
Been liked: 49 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by serge750 »

Won't they just go with the P8 ?

tomuk
Member
Posts: 841
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 213 times
United Kingdom

Re: CANADA

Post by tomuk »

They have already chosen P8.
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/medias-me ... 0-eng.html
Following engagements with industry and Canada’s closest allies, the government has determined that the P-8A Poseidon is the only currently available aircraft that meets all of the CMMA operational requirements, namely anti-submarine warfare and C4ISR. This platform is a proven capability that is operated by several of Canada’s defence partners including all of its Five Eyes allies—the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand—as well as Norway, and South Korea. Germany has also recently purchased this platform.

With a view to exploring this option in more detail, Canada has recently submitted a Letter of Request (LOR) through the United States government’s Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program outlining Canada’s requirements and requesting an offer. These requirements include up to 16 P-8A Poseidon aircraft and associated equipment and initial servicing, as well as access to intellectual property and technical data.
Hopefully this is just the Canadians trying to get a good deal or some offsets from the US. If they are serious about not getting P8 what's wrong with SAAB Globaleye it is a Bombardier airframe.
These users liked the author tomuk for the post:
serge750

Post Reply