F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

Contains threads on Joint Service equipment of the past, present and future.
Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 2847
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Has liked: 96 times
Been liked: 347 times
United Kingdom

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

Post by Timmymagic »

sunstersun wrote: 13 Mar 2023, 17:40 Keeps the Pratt engine.

Convenient for all international partners.
It's good news for the UK, there was never any real prospect of a full re-engining programme, so development of the F-135 is the best option for us.

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2716
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 92 times
United Kingdom

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

Post by dmereifield »

Excuse my ignorance, but why is that convenient for international partners?

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 6747
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
Has liked: 283 times
Been liked: 112 times
United States of America

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

Post by Ron5 »

Timmymagic wrote: 13 Mar 2023, 19:06
sunstersun wrote: 13 Mar 2023, 17:40 Keeps the Pratt engine.

Convenient for all international partners.
It's good news for the UK, there was never any real prospect of a full re-engining programme, so development of the F-135 is the best option for us.
It's the best option for the UK because as far as I know, the new, new engines would only be supported on the F-35A & F-35C.

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 2847
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Has liked: 96 times
Been liked: 347 times
United Kingdom

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

Post by Timmymagic »

dmereifield wrote: 13 Mar 2023, 22:52 Excuse my ignorance, but why is that convenient for international partners?
We don't all have mansized budgets to go and re-engine like the US does...plus a lot of international users have completed their purchases and will have them all delivered by the time any alternative engine would be developed for new production. This way they get the ability to enhance their exisitng engines, using their existing support and maintenance arrangements at a reasonable cost.
Ron5 wrote: 14 Mar 2023, 13:20 It's the best option for the UK because as far as I know, the new, new engines would only be supported on the F-35A & F-35C.
There had recently been a quote from GE that they were looking to also adapt the engines to F-35B. But I suspect that that was a bit of marketing...probably no more than back of the fag packet stuff...and only achievable in new production or colossal cost.
These users liked the author Timmymagic for the post (total 2):
dmereifieldRon5

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 6747
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
Has liked: 283 times
Been liked: 112 times
United States of America

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

Post by Ron5 »

Timmymagic wrote: 14 Mar 2023, 14:16 ... mansized budgets ...
Very good :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

sunstersun
Member
Posts: 349
Joined: 09 Aug 2017, 04:00
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 24 times
United States of America

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

Post by sunstersun »

UK could do something like 2 meteors and 4 Cudas for 6 air to air missiles. Sidekick is not gonna be available for the B version.

Post Reply