Royal Navy SSK?

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
tomuk
Member
Posts: 349
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 3 times
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Navy SSK?

Post by tomuk »

SD67 wrote: 11 Jan 2022, 19:18 With PWR3 coming in and steam boilers going out,
Do you mean swapping steam turbine direct drive for turbo electric? A reactor can't work without generating steam.

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 6414
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 44 times
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Navy SSK?

Post by Lord Jim »

The Russians developed a reactor that used liquid metal to transfer heat but even then they still used steam to drive the turbines. The PWR3 will still rely on heat transferred from the closed pressurised water systems that is part of the reactor to a separate closed cycle that forms steam to drive the turbines. The latter is cooled and recycled. The PWR3 is a self contained unit that is designed to last the life of whatever boat it is installed in, negating the need for costly and time consuming refuelings.

jedibeeftrix
Member
Posts: 362
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:54
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Royal Navy SSK?

Post by jedibeeftrix »

Can we just rename this thread "Royal Navy XLUSV?" already?

There is no future for SSK's in the RN.
These users liked the author jedibeeftrix for the post (total 2):
Repulsedonald_of_tokyo

Post Reply