It really isn't...when it comes to EW power and size mean a hell of a lot. The different varieties of NHJ will be far more powerful than anything the F-35 can mount internally.sunstersun wrote:The EW on the F-35 is better than the Growler.
F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3249
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
But then don't you start to get into the discussion around biggest isn't always neccesary? A Growler might be neccesary to protect a Super Hornet-derived strike package in a high threat environment but something a bit sneakier might not need quite as much power to provide the same effect.Timmymagic wrote: It really isn't...when it comes to EW power and size mean a hell of a lot. The different varieties of NHJ will be far more powerful than anything the F-35 can mount internally.
Not denying EA-18G is a very capable platform, NGJ-family is going to be interesting to watch join the fleet, but IMO required EW power is relative to the thing(s) it's attempting to protect rather than the absolute figure. At least to a certain degree.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3249
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Now with video...hopefully the price isn't that outrageous for a carbon fibre tube with some fittings..Timmymagic wrote:Seen elsewhere...hopefully the MoD can shake the piggy bank and find some small change for a number of these..at 7.5 ft it will fit in F-35B (PWIV is 8.5 ft.)
http://www.kihomac.virtualtsb.com/atp/# ... 3-39a2d428
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Good news but why wait for another five years, the Fleet needs it now for the F-35B to be a credible defensive platform and provide the outer layer of the Carrier Groups air defences.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Five years, in reality earlier if needed, not a bad deal considering f how long it took it to enter service on Typhoon. Money is needed elsewhere it's a none issue.Lord Jim wrote:Good news but why wait for another five years, the Fleet needs it now for the F-35B to be a credible defensive platform and provide the outer layer of the Carrier Groups air defences.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Isn't it tied to the delivery of Blk IV software? I doubt if anyone has the enthusiasm to integrate with older levels.Lord Jim wrote:Good news but why wait for another five years, the Fleet needs it now for the F-35B to be a credible defensive platform and provide the outer layer of the Carrier Groups air defences.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Isn't the block 4 software split into 4 sections? From memory the Meteor was in section 4.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3249
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Yes its delivered incrementally, it doesn't drop all in 1 go. What everyone also needs to be aware of is that even when Meteor is integrated to F-35 in general, there may be a significant part of the UK's F-35B fleet that won't be able to carry it until they receive the full hardware upgrades to enable them to be 'Block IV'd'. Hopefully these upgrades will run in parallel with the software effort so we reach a position in c2027 where all of the UK's fleet, with the exception of the 3 Test aircraft, are of the same standard and avoid the 'Fleet within Fleets' issue that other UK and US platforms have suffered from.Jdam wrote:Isn't the block 4 software split into 4 sections? From memory the Meteor was in section 4.
Amraam C-5 is credible already. But the arrival of Amraam D next year means we're pretty well covered for the interim period. There aren't many platforms out there that stand a chance against an F-35 with Amraam D and legacy Asraam. Meteor (or even better JNAAM) and Asraam CSP are the icing on a very capable cake.Lord Jim wrote:Good news but why wait for another five years, the Fleet needs it now for the F-35B to be a credible defensive platform and provide the outer layer of the Carrier Groups air defences.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
And some treasury dimwit out in left field is yelling but we don't want no stinking British missiles on Apache, cheaper to buy American
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Part of me hopes that Brimstone will be integrated onto the Apache Guardian at a later date to give the platform more options. I believe Brimstone 3 has a more capable seeker combo that the US Missile, and someone somewhere has got to realise that we already have Brimstone in service with the RAF and it may also be adopted in a ground launched version by the Army as a long range over watch system. A "Shoot off" between the two missile by teh AAC would be interesting.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Ellwood keeps asking why are they being so effing stupid on this issue but it's not clear if that (he) has much weight. He also thinks the army should be using Brimstone on Ajax and Boxer too. Like what's the point of the UK having a world leading weapon if it's own forces are not using it?Lord Jim wrote:Part of me hopes that Brimstone will be integrated onto the Apache Guardian at a later date to give the platform more options. I believe Brimstone 3 has a more capable seeker combo that the US Missile, and someone somewhere has got to realise that we already have Brimstone in service with the RAF and it may also be adopted in a ground launched version by the Army as a long range over watch system. A "Shoot off" between the two missile by teh AAC would be interesting.
Would work pretty well on ships too ..
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3249
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
The most annoying thing is that "Sea Spear" is Single Mode Brimstone. RAF still has large stocks of these, however all new buys are Dual Mode Brimstone. The need for large quantities of MMW only Brimstone today is actually pretty limited. There are plenty that could be used on RN vessels...RAF would be happy with Dual Mode only stockpiles. Same with Hellfire L in the AAC...Ron5 wrote:Ellwood keeps asking why are they being so effing stupid on this issue but it's not clear if that (he) has much weight. He also thinks the army should be using Brimstone on Ajax and Boxer too. Like what's the point of the UK having a world leading weapon if it's own forces are not using it?Lord Jim wrote:Part of me hopes that Brimstone will be integrated onto the Apache Guardian at a later date to give the platform more options. I believe Brimstone 3 has a more capable seeker combo that the US Missile, and someone somewhere has got to realise that we already have Brimstone in service with the RAF and it may also be adopted in a ground launched version by the Army as a long range over watch system. A "Shoot off" between the two missile by teh AAC would be interesting.
Would work pretty well on ships too ..
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Don't disagree it's limited but might become less limited with more emphasis on anti-armour. But let's be clear Brimstone 1 (MMW only) stocks will progressively LIFEX as their constituent EMs age. I'd be surprised if there are many MMW only Brimstones going forward, with their recoverable components recycled into Brimstones 2 & 3.Timmymagic wrote:The need for large quantities of MMW only Brimstone today is actually pretty limited.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
err, they are. It's on Typhoon and being integrated onto Protector. As for land let's see where BGOAA leads.Ron5 wrote:Like what's the point of the UK having a world leading weapon if it's own forces are not using it?
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
BGOAA is either a case of reinventing the wheel yet again or aiming for a capability that is based on technology far from being mature. Brimstone is a world class weapon system available now to fill holes in the UKs military capabilities. Yes look ten twenty years into the future for the nest generation weapons or those in the following generation but at least get something to the troops on the ground or even at sea, in a more timely manner, i.e. Brimstone.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Why do you think BGOAA is twenty years in the future? I'm also not sure what relevance Brimstone has to F-35?Lord Jim wrote:BGOAA is either a case of reinventing the wheel yet again or aiming for a capability that is based on technology far from being mature. Brimstone is a world class weapon system available now to fill holes in the UKs military capabilities. Yes look ten twenty years into the future for the nest generation weapons or those in the following generation but at least get something to the troops on the ground or even at sea, in a more timely manner, i.e. Brimstone.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Brimstone 3 is an effective and proven weapon system capable of engaging single or multiple targets, autonomously or semi-autonomously. It has a smaller warhead than SPEAR 3 but still effective and is probably cheaper. With the F-35 it would probably carried on external pylons, but the F-35 will not always operate in full stealth mode. The RAF cannot afford to do so and the FAA even more so. We simply do not, nor will not have sufficient manned aircraft to operate it as such and even when TEMPEST enters service, its prime mission is going to be A2A.
As for BGOAA being twenty years in the future, maybe that is a bit far but some of the capabilities listed are still in the research phase. If a solution with less capability is then there are already families of ATGWs available off the shelf that are still evolving and adding new capabilities, Spike being the obvious one. To develop a new weapon system that does not greatly exceed these is simple reinventing the wheel, and that is something we cannot afford to do. For the ground launched long range role though guess what we already have Brimstone 3, which would be a pretty good choice to fill the Army's existing capability gap, and it should have been a logical choice for Apache, having already proven it would work with the platform. But someone somewhere decided that we would introduce a totally new, stand alone system within the MoD for the Apache on cost grounds, ignoring saving the MoD would have made form having a common missile operated across multiple domains that was already in service one.
As for BGOAA being twenty years in the future, maybe that is a bit far but some of the capabilities listed are still in the research phase. If a solution with less capability is then there are already families of ATGWs available off the shelf that are still evolving and adding new capabilities, Spike being the obvious one. To develop a new weapon system that does not greatly exceed these is simple reinventing the wheel, and that is something we cannot afford to do. For the ground launched long range role though guess what we already have Brimstone 3, which would be a pretty good choice to fill the Army's existing capability gap, and it should have been a logical choice for Apache, having already proven it would work with the platform. But someone somewhere decided that we would introduce a totally new, stand alone system within the MoD for the Apache on cost grounds, ignoring saving the MoD would have made form having a common missile operated across multiple domains that was already in service one.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3249
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Great thread from Gabi. Looks like the road-map for upgrading the UK's F-35 fleet to Block IV capability will be proved by the USMC.
The reason why this is great news is that if the USMC price it and prove it then it is likely the UK will move to the same standard. Not only for reasons of commonality, but also because going our own route could add cost and significant risk. Essentially this means that the likelihood of the UK's fleet receiving the full Block IV enhancements to the highest level (most capable EW, processing, wide screen display, weapons bay changes and the previously confirmed EOTS/DAS upgrade) just increased massively...
However...the flipside of this is that it is now increasingly likely that the first UK Combat Capable jet, BK-03, will not now get upgraded to Block IV. The risk, and cost, to upgrade an aircraft from one of the earliest production a/c to Block IV (which the US isn't doing), all on our own could potentially be too great. And an individual upgrade cost of well north of $25m is probably not worth it on an airframe with some hours on it already. Personally, if given the choice, I'd upgrade the F-35B fleet to the Block IV Lot 17 standard, with the exception of the 2 x initial ITF 'Orange Wired' test aircraft and BK-03 as Block 2/3F (not sure if the 3rd, later production, ITF aircraft would need an upgrade or not for the work that it does). I'd try and use BK-03 as an airshow aircraft, training, trials and stealthy aggressor....however balanced against this the fear of up to 4/5 Combat Capable aircraft from earlier batches not being Block IV'd seem to have receded somewhat. At the moment its looking good for 44 x Block IV, Lot 17 standard F-35B. If we can add some more to that to get to 60+ all will be well.
The reason why this is great news is that if the USMC price it and prove it then it is likely the UK will move to the same standard. Not only for reasons of commonality, but also because going our own route could add cost and significant risk. Essentially this means that the likelihood of the UK's fleet receiving the full Block IV enhancements to the highest level (most capable EW, processing, wide screen display, weapons bay changes and the previously confirmed EOTS/DAS upgrade) just increased massively...
However...the flipside of this is that it is now increasingly likely that the first UK Combat Capable jet, BK-03, will not now get upgraded to Block IV. The risk, and cost, to upgrade an aircraft from one of the earliest production a/c to Block IV (which the US isn't doing), all on our own could potentially be too great. And an individual upgrade cost of well north of $25m is probably not worth it on an airframe with some hours on it already. Personally, if given the choice, I'd upgrade the F-35B fleet to the Block IV Lot 17 standard, with the exception of the 2 x initial ITF 'Orange Wired' test aircraft and BK-03 as Block 2/3F (not sure if the 3rd, later production, ITF aircraft would need an upgrade or not for the work that it does). I'd try and use BK-03 as an airshow aircraft, training, trials and stealthy aggressor....however balanced against this the fear of up to 4/5 Combat Capable aircraft from earlier batches not being Block IV'd seem to have receded somewhat. At the moment its looking good for 44 x Block IV, Lot 17 standard F-35B. If we can add some more to that to get to 60+ all will be well.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3249
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Hat tip to Navy Lookout for tweeting about this..
https://www.f35.com/f35/news-and-featur ... r-csg.html
Also confirms that 6 x F-35 will be going to sea later this year on HMS Prince of Wales.
https://www.f35.com/f35/news-and-featur ... r-csg.html
Also confirms that 6 x F-35 will be going to sea later this year on HMS Prince of Wales.
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Not been able to keep up with a lot of news lately... what's the UK F-35 numbers currently?
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3249
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
At present its still 21 total.SDL wrote:Not been able to keep up with a lot of news lately... what's the UK F-35 numbers currently?
3 x ITF aircraft at Edwards (all non-combat capable), 8 x a/c on Queen Elizabeth, 4 x a/c on Prince of Wales. With 6 remaining at Marham.
There should be another 6 delivered in the next 3 months and 8 more next year, that is unless COVID has delayed them by a small amount.
The 6 delivered this year and 8 delivered next will increase our 'combat capable' fleet by 33% in each year. So a massive increase in real capability.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Thats more than I had though. I hope they keep the pace up beyond that(?). When are we expecting to see the 3rd and 4th frontline squadrons to stand up?Timmymagic wrote:At present its still 21 total.SDL wrote:Not been able to keep up with a lot of news lately... what's the UK F-35 numbers currently?
3 x ITF aircraft at Edwards (all non-combat capable), 8 x a/c on Queen Elizabeth, 4 x a/c on Prince of Wales. With 6 remaining at Marham.
There should be another 6 delivered in the next 3 months and 8 more next year, that is unless COVID has delayed them by a small amount.
The 6 delivered this year and 8 delivered next will increase our 'combat capable' fleet by 33% in each year. So a massive increase in real capability.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
The Second (Operational) Squadron; 809NAS scheduled to stand up during 2023. Beyond that, it seems rather speculative.