Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.

What will be the result of the 'Lighter Frigate' programme?

Programme cancelled, RN down to 14 escorts
52
10%
Programme cancelled & replaced with GP T26
14
3%
A number of heavy OPVs spun as "frigates"
127
25%
An LCS-like modular ship
22
4%
A modernised Type 23
24
5%
A Type 26-lite
71
14%
Less than 5 hulls
22
4%
5 hulls
71
14%
More than 5 hulls
103
20%
 
Total votes: 506

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1411
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by tomuk »

Jdam wrote:
Jensy wrote:
The only supplier on that list who actually manufacture in the UK are Darchem.
Not a good look for the program is it.
Who else should we buy the engines from? There is no UK equivalent (except possibly the German owned VP185 from ex Paxman Colchester). At least MTU is owned by Rolls Royce and profits/tax should accrue to the UK.

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Lord Jim »

Doubt it, the contract will be with MTU in Germany not Rolls Royce UK, so the taxes etc will remain there. This situation will be repeated time after time, unless of course the Government want to invest public money in UK engineering and manufacturing in a sustained and meaningful manner over a considerable period of time, and we would be talking £Bns here.

Then again there is a reason the T-31e is cheap, imagine the cost if it was stipulated that say 80% had to be manufactured as well as assembled un the UK?

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1411
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by tomuk »

Lord Jim wrote:Doubt it, the contract will be with MTU in Germany not Rolls Royce UK, so the taxes etc will remain there. This situation will be repeated time after time, unless of course the Government want to invest public money in UK engineering and manufacturing in a sustained and meaningful manner over a considerable period of time, and we would be talking £Bns here.

Then again there is a reason the T-31e is cheap, imagine the cost if it was stipulated that say 80% had to be manufactured as well as assembled un the UK?
Rolls Royce UK are the ultimate owners of MTU so some of the profit will accrue to the UK business and will therefore produce some Tax and some dividend for UK pension funds. It won't be as much benefit as if they were built in the UK but there will be some.

I'm not sure why you criticise just the T31. As the T26 will also use German MTUs and Norwegian shafts and propellers. Not to mention the German MTUs being fitted to the T23s and T45s. And not forgetting the German MAN diesels (descended from English Electric) fitted to the Batch 2 Rivers.

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2900
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by abc123 »

tomuk wrote:
Lord Jim wrote:Doubt it, the contract will be with MTU in Germany not Rolls Royce UK, so the taxes etc will remain there. This situation will be repeated time after time, unless of course the Government want to invest public money in UK engineering and manufacturing in a sustained and meaningful manner over a considerable period of time, and we would be talking £Bns here.

Then again there is a reason the T-31e is cheap, imagine the cost if it was stipulated that say 80% had to be manufactured as well as assembled un the UK?
Rolls Royce UK are the ultimate owners of MTU so some of the profit will accrue to the UK business and will therefore produce some Tax and some dividend for UK pension funds. It won't be as much benefit as if they were built in the UK but there will be some.

I'm not sure why you criticise just the T31. As the T26 will also use German MTUs and Norwegian shafts and propellers. Not to mention the German MTUs being fitted to the T23s and T45s. And not forgetting the German MAN diesels (descended from English Electric) fitted to the Batch 2 Rivers.
Well, considering that MTU is pretty much a gold standard in modern escort ships...
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

NickC
Donator
Posts: 1432
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by NickC »

The recent Babcock announcement of contract awards signals that they are diverging from the Iver Huitfeldt propulsion spec, IH class features 4 x MTU 20V Series 8000 M70 (M71) @ 8,200 kW each (100% MCR), 32,800 kW, and four Caterpillar DG's, two 3512B gensets rated to 1,360 eKw 60 Hz @ 1,800 rpm and two 3508B gensets rated to 910 eKw 60 Hz @ 1,800 rpm, whereas T31 MTU order for is for both MTU MDE's and DG's.

No mention made in Babcock PR of MTU engine series chosen, the premium 8000 series, V20 @ 49.6t each, as used in the IH class, or the cheaper 1163 series V20 @ 25t each as used by the USCG Legend class NSC fitted with two 7,400 kW 20V 1163 and a history of numerous cracked cylinder heads even with the re-designed head and problems in operating in high water temperatures forcing ship to reduce speed, shades of T45, whether problems ever sorted don't know.

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1411
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by tomuk »

NickC wrote:The recent Babcock announcement of contract awards signals that they are diverging from the Iver Huitfeldt propulsion spec, IH class features 4 x MTU 20V Series 8000 M70 (M71) @ 8,200 kW each (100% MCR), 32,800 kW, and four Caterpillar DG's, two 3512B gensets rated to 1,360 eKw 60 Hz @ 1,800 rpm and two 3508B gensets rated to 910 eKw 60 Hz @ 1,800 rpm, whereas T31 MTU order for is for both MTU MDE's and DG's.

No mention made in Babcock PR of MTU engine series chosen, the premium 8000 series, V20 @ 49.6t each, as used in the IH class, or the cheaper 1163 series V20 @ 25t each as used by the USCG Legend class NSC fitted with two 7,400 kW 20V 1163 and a history of numerous cracked cylinder heads even with the re-designed head and problems in operating in high water temperatures forcing ship to reduce speed, shades of T45, whether problems ever sorted don't know.
Why are we looking for conspiracies :wtf: As Babcock have already said, and is only logical, they have reviewed the Iver Huitfelt equipment and updated them to the latest spec. i.e The MTU 20V 8000 M71 is the current updated model.

I would be highly surprised if they went with the MTU 1163 as it is a completely different engine and would require revised mounts and changes to props/gearboxes as it runs at higher revs. It would be a costly redesign. It would also be 40% down on power compared to MTU 8000 installation.

Regarding the change from CAT to MTU DGs these are a lot more interchangeable and it probably makes more sense from a support perspective to use the same Manufacturer for Main and Aux power and also have commonality with T23/26/45 etc.

NickC
Donator
Posts: 1432
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by NickC »

tomuk wrote:
NickC wrote:The recent Babcock announcement of contract awards signals that they are diverging from the Iver Huitfeldt propulsion spec, IH class features 4 x MTU 20V Series 8000 M70 (M71) @ 8,200 kW each (100% MCR), 32,800 kW, and four Caterpillar DG's, two 3512B gensets rated to 1,360 eKw 60 Hz @ 1,800 rpm and two 3508B gensets rated to 910 eKw 60 Hz @ 1,800 rpm, whereas T31 MTU order for is for both MTU MDE's and DG's.

No mention made in Babcock PR of MTU engine series chosen, the premium 8000 series, V20 @ 49.6t each, as used in the IH class, or the cheaper 1163 series V20 @ 25t each as used by the USCG Legend class NSC fitted with two 7,400 kW 20V 1163 and a history of numerous cracked cylinder heads even with the re-designed head and problems in operating in high water temperatures forcing ship to reduce speed, shades of T45, whether problems ever sorted don't know.
Why are we looking for conspiracies :wtf: As Babcock have already said, and is only logical, they have reviewed the Iver Huitfelt equipment and updated them to the latest spec. i.e The MTU 20V 8000 M71 is the current updated model.

I would be highly surprised if they went with the MTU 1163 as it is a completely different engine and would require revised mounts and changes to props/gearboxes as it runs at higher revs. It would be a costly redesign. It would also be 40% down on power compared to MTU 8000 installation.

Regarding the change from CAT to MTU DGs these are a lot more interchangeable and it probably makes more sense from a support perspective to use the same Manufacturer for Main and Aux power and also have commonality with T23/26/45 etc.
Was not thinking of a conspiracy but if, a big if, Babcock were having to cut costs to meet the very tight £250 million target price that would have been one option open to them to replace the 8000 MDE with the 1163, also to be remembered that T31 will be approx 1,000t lighter ship than IH.

Puzzled by by your comment that power would be down by 40% with the 1163, 8000 M71 @ 8,200kW vs 1163 M94 @ 7,400kW, that's only ~10%. Re higher rpm, 1,325 vs 1150 would have thought would be no problem for RENK to change the gear ratios, sure they offer various options and lastly thought engine mount change would not be a costly change?

Final thought much prefer Babcock sticking with the 8000 but can see cost pressures pushing them to the 1163, as yet have not seen no PR from RR-MTU re Babcocks order and details of MDE's and DG's and wonder why, they are usually very quick.

NickC
Donator
Posts: 1432
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by NickC »

BusinessLive report on T31 contracts Babcock placed recently

"MTU, delivering the main engines and diesel generators for the frigates. These will be manufactured in Germany // It has also been announced that German manufacturer Renk will provide the main reduction gearboxes, and Germany-headquartered MAN Energy Solutions will supply the propellers and propeller shaft lines. // Denmark’s Blunox is contracted to supply the exhaust environmental equipment that significantly reduces emissions from the main engines and diesel generators. // Combined with the subcontract placed with Darchem Engineering Ltd, based in Stockton-on-Tees, this will supply the intake and exhaust systems for the main engines and generators, rounding out the key propulsion system subcontracts. // The chilled water plant subcontract is going to Novenco AS, a Scandinavian firm [Oslo - Norway], to provide critical system capability for the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) system."

From <https://www.business-live.co.uk/manufac ... s-18157074>

RetroSicotte
Retired Site Admin
Posts: 2657
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by RetroSicotte »

Have to wonder, what exactly on this ship is even British other than the CAMM silos?

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Lord Jim »

I suppose that is what you get when you fix the price and the capability demands, the contractor has to find the most affordable components where ever they may be sourced from. Wasn't the criteria to build the ship in the UK with little or no mention of where the parts came from except the GFE?

Magpie64
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: 03 Apr 2020, 11:23
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Magpie64 »

Does anyone know when the names for the Type 31s are likely to be announced?

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5557
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Tempest414 »

Magpie64 wrote:Does anyone know when the names for the Type 31s are likely to be announced?
Hopefully the back end of this year

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

RetroSicotte wrote:Have to wonder, what exactly on this ship is even British other than the CAMM silos?
But, we shall also do the same "wondering" for T26, as well.
- British = construction, hull-design, CMS, GT, Gear-box, motor, CAMM and its tubes, SeaCentor anti-torpedo decoy system, hull-sonar, 3D radar, 30mm gun, ESM/ECM, EO site, decoy launcher ...
- import = Diesel gen, 5inch gun and its robotic arsenal, Mk.41 VLS, 20mm CIWS, nav-radar, mission-bay's crane,
- international/including UK = CAPTAS-4,

# of course not complete, sorry

In case of T31, it looks like
- British = construction, CAMM and its tubes ...
- import = hull-design, CMS, Diesel gen, 57mm-gun, 40mm guns, 3D radar, ESM/ECM, nav-radar, EO site

Hmm. Yes I agree it is un-impressive...

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7249
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

RetroSicotte wrote:Have to wonder, what exactly on this ship is even British other than the CAMM silos?
I'm having real trouble thinking of anything apart from the sweat of Scottish metal workers. Such is the product of Geo Osborne's National Shipbuilding Strategy aka "Anyone but Bae".

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7249
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

donald_of_tokyo wrote:
RetroSicotte wrote:Have to wonder, what exactly on this ship is even British other than the CAMM silos?
But, we shall also do the same "wondering" for T26, as well.
- British = construction, hull-design, CMS, GT, Gear-box, motor, CAMM and its tubes, SeaCentor anti-torpedo decoy system, hull-sonar, 3D radar, 30mm gun, ESM/ECM, EO site, decoy launcher ...
- import = Diesel gen, 5inch gun and its robotic arsenal, Mk.41 VLS, 20mm CIWS, nav-radar, mission-bay's crane,
- international/including UK = CAPTAS-4,

# of course not complete, sorry

In case of T31, it looks like
- British = construction, CAMM and its tubes ...
- import = hull-design, CMS, Diesel gen, 57mm-gun, 40mm guns, 3D radar, ESM/ECM, nav-radar, EO site

Hmm. Yes I agree it is un-impressive...
I thought the T26 navigation radars will be Kelvin Hughes Sharpeye which is UK?

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7249
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

Tempest414 wrote:
Magpie64 wrote:Does anyone know when the names for the Type 31s are likely to be announced?
Hopefully the back end of this year
Weapons would be nice: Battleaxe, Arrow, Broadsword, Dagger, Longbow

or battles: Armada, Jutland, Falklands, Taranto, Trafalgar

or statesmen/women: Churchill, Thatcher, Wellington, Pitt, Boris

Magpie64
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: 03 Apr 2020, 11:23
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Magpie64 »

Ron5 wrote:
Tempest414 wrote:
Magpie64 wrote:Does anyone know when the names for the Type 31s are likely to be announced?
Hopefully the back end of this year
Weapons would be nice: Battleaxe, Arrow, Broadsword, Dagger, Longbow

or battles: Armada, Jutland, Falklands, Taranto, Trafalgar

or statesmen/women: Churchill, Thatcher, Wellington, Pitt, Boris
I like the old Type 41 frigate 'cat' names Leopard, Lynx, Puma and Jaguar and possibly the fifth Lion or Tiger? But I've got a suspicion the Leander names may be revived.

Jdam
Member
Posts: 923
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Jdam »

Ron5 wrote:
Tempest414 wrote:
Magpie64 wrote:Does anyone know when the names for the Type 31s are likely to be announced?
Hopefully the back end of this year
Weapons would be nice: Battleaxe, Arrow, Broadsword, Dagger, Longbow
Would get my vote :thumbup:

User avatar
RichardIC
Senior Member
Posts: 1371
Joined: 10 May 2015, 16:59
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by RichardIC »

Magpie64 wrote:I like the old Type 41 frigate 'cat' names Leopard, Lynx, Puma and Jaguar and possibly the fifth Lion or Tiger? But I've got a suspicion the Leander names may be revived.
This is totally not news, but I'm both bored and exhausted in equal part (working at home for six weeks). But I reckon zero chance of Leander names. Only mythological name left is Argus and she's nearly 100 years old.

I'm going for F-class (tsk). And I've got preferences for the others, but I want number one to be Fearless.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Ron5 wrote:or battles: Armada, Jutland, Falklands, Taranto, Trafalgar
a nice one as the only "F" on the list is the only one that will not piss one or the other NATO partner off
... and the others would be? Falklands and Fearless would go nicely together
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

RetroSicotte
Retired Site Admin
Posts: 2657
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by RetroSicotte »

Can't call them after weapons. That'd imply it can be used in a fight. ;)

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7249
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:
Ron5 wrote:or battles: Armada, Jutland, Falklands, Taranto, Trafalgar
a nice one as the only "F" on the list is the only one that will not piss one or the other NATO partner off
... and the others would be? Falklands and Fearless would go nicely together
They weren't random choices :-)

seaspear
Senior Member
Posts: 1779
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:16
Australia

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by seaspear »

Or perhaps name them after the WW2 Castle class ,plenty of castles to name them after .

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2900
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by abc123 »

RichardIC wrote:
Magpie64 wrote:I like the old Type 41 frigate 'cat' names Leopard, Lynx, Puma and Jaguar and possibly the fifth Lion or Tiger? But I've got a suspicion the Leander names may be revived.
This is totally not news, but I'm both bored and exhausted in equal part (working at home for six weeks). But I reckon zero chance of Leander names. Only mythological name left is Argus and she's nearly 100 years old.

.
Argus and Agamemnon.
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

abc123 wrote:Argus
Has been popular across the three services... don't know it that is a plus?

Achilles would not sound too good, either :)
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Post Reply