I'll get the Saxa.The Armchair Soldier wrote:Okay, it's the Daily Mail and Daily Star, but...
Search found 164 matches
- 09 Aug 2015, 18:05
- Forum: Personnel and Units
- Topic: United Kingdom Special Forces (UKSF)
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12156
Re: United Kingdom Special Forces (UKSF)
- 08 Aug 2015, 12:43
- Forum: Personnel and Units
- Topic: United Kingdom Special Forces (UKSF)
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12156
Re: United Kingdom Special Forces (UKSF)
"Softened" Risk assessed in order to safeguard. I doubt the selection tests will be made any easier by having additional caches of water. Postponing the event when the weather is too severe isn't making it any more soft. British weather is typically four seasons in a day so any postponeme...
- 08 Aug 2015, 09:54
- Forum: Personnel and Units
- Topic: United Kingdom Special Forces (UKSF)
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12156
Re: United Kingdom Special Forces (UKSF)
Somehow I don't think this is the solution though. SAS selection test 'to be softened' Recruitment tests to join the SAS will be "softened" in response to the deaths of three reservists during a selection march, the Times has claimed. The newspaper says test marches in the Brecon Beacons c...
- 02 Aug 2015, 19:21
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: HM Forces General Service Vehicles
- Replies: 82
- Views: 62457
Re: HM Forces General Service Vehicles
...It's got angry eyes.arfah wrote:BAE Systems have been working on a Pinzgauer 2.
It's a bit fugly, though.
http://www.military-today.com/trucks/pinzgauer_2.htm
- 29 Jul 2015, 17:33
- Forum: Personnel and Units
- Topic: Royal Marines
- Replies: 207
- Views: 43791
Re: Royal Marines
Are Ops-Core lids on issue to the corps then?The Armchair Soldier wrote:
- 28 Jul 2015, 23:17
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
Presumably so they can claim they own it when the next indyref rolls around.marktigger wrote:downsizer wrote:Two reasons why it won't be Lossie.
1. SNP.
2. Space.
Waddo.
SNP are pushing the case for it to be in scotland
- 28 Jul 2015, 11:00
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: USA Armed Forces
- Replies: 2092
- Views: 113253
Re: USA Armed Forces
USMC moving to M4: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story/military/2015/07/27/marine-officials-endorse-infantry-plan--ditch-m16--m4/30145257/ "Some argue beyond that the M4 carbine lacks effectiveness versus the M16, but the M16 is like driving a sports car with a six-cylinder engine," he ...
- 24 Jul 2015, 19:07
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: French Armed Forces
- Replies: 1878
- Views: 146302
Re: French Armed Forces
So does anyone have any idea what's going to happen to the Mistrals that aren't going to Russia any more?
- 22 Jul 2015, 10:34
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6102
- Views: 1778843
Re: F-35B Lightning II (RN & RAF)
The problem is that historical precedent has taught us that the moment you eliminate a fighter's gun is the moment you discover that you actually still need it after all.
- 21 Jul 2015, 11:42
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
What we need is a full blown MPA with capabilities to value add to other types of operation eg limited ELINT or ELOP for overland and some Airborne C3I capability. to my mind challenger and persuader don't meet those criteria. The only viable options at present are P1 & P8. I suspect the pressu...
- 21 Jul 2015, 11:21
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
O'h s**t, I hope the bean counters at the treasury didn't attend RIAT,else this will give them more ideas on how to save money. http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/riat-boeings-maritime-surveillance-aircraft-heads-for-nordic-414801/ Still think the Persuader is the better "budget" o...
- 20 Jul 2015, 21:11
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
Probably from my comment about surplus P-3s.downsizer wrote:Where is this talk of interim platforms and shit coming from?
- 20 Jul 2015, 20:19
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
I'm still surprised the USN isn't trying to flog us some of its old Orions to go with the Airseekers.
- 20 Jul 2015, 19:18
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
Could this clinch a P8 deal http://www.janes.com/article/53075/airtanker-touts-boom-for-voyager-to-expand-aerial-refuelling-provision Considering it's pretty much a requirement for the Globemasters and Airseekers, the equipment is already fitted to French and Australian MRTTs, and all of the potent...
- 20 Jul 2015, 12:25
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
The original A380 design didn't have reversers at all.
- 20 Jul 2015, 09:41
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
I beg to differ.xav wrote:Nothing so special about it: Check out A380, A340raven111 wrote: Still find it interesting that only the inboard engines seem to be reversible.
- 19 Jul 2015, 23:29
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
It's got the same theoretical payload capacity, I believe. (Wiki says ~20,000lb for both)marktigger wrote:nice display the weapons bay doors open in an interesting way. not as cavernous as the nimrods bay.
- 19 Jul 2015, 21:30
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
Still find it interesting that only the inboard engines seem to be reversible.
- 18 Jul 2015, 20:01
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6102
- Views: 1778843
Re: F-35B Lightning II (RN & RAF)
Google 'picard578 bias' and you'll see he's got serious issues with the F-35. If someone handed me a report and I knew they already had a bias against what they were reporting on I wouldn't trust their objectivity one bit. Ah but do you apply the same criteria to pro-F-35 biased reports too ? But e...
- 18 Jul 2015, 13:15
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
Making a C295 into a SIGINT platform costs another $100m http://www.lockheedmartin.co.uk/m/us/news/press-releases/2012/july/0709isgs-ground-support.html Even though a full spectrum MPA for sub-hunting is in no way technically less complex, the quoted extra $100m did include the ground station compo...
- 18 Jul 2015, 13:10
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
And what is your definition of a "proper MPA"?downsizer wrote:Lets not forget there is a capability step between what the 295 can do and what a proper MPA can do.
- 18 Jul 2015, 09:53
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
About that tweet I posted here: Basically, it is Tim Robinson (Editor in Chief of AEROSPACE - the flagship magazine of the Royal Aeronautical Society) showing a picture of a (scale model) CN-295 MPA at RIAT saying Of course C295 in its maritime patrol variant another contender for the UK MPA requir...
- 17 Jul 2015, 22:30
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
https://twitter.com/RAeSTimR/status/621947114323623936 ...We really need to fix Twitter integration here. It doesn't work for you ? All I see whenever someone links a tweet is a blank post. Which browser are you using? Works perfectly fine with Chrome. Firefox 39.0 on Windows 7 SP1. It might be wor...
- 17 Jul 2015, 22:03
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
Firefox 39.0 on Windows 7 SP1.The Armchair Soldier wrote:Which browser are you using? Works perfectly fine with Chrome.raven111 wrote:All I see whenever someone links a tweet is a blank post.xav wrote:It doesn't work for you ?raven111 wrote:...We really need to fix Twitter integration here.xav wrote:
- 17 Jul 2015, 20:23
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
- Replies: 1217
- Views: 460022
Re: Future UK Maritime Patrol Options
All I see whenever someone links a tweet is a blank post.xav wrote:It doesn't work for you ?raven111 wrote:...We really need to fix Twitter integration here.xav wrote: