Search found 7314 matches

by Lord Jim
13 May 2021, 01:19
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: POLAND
Replies: 122
Views: 14820
United Kingdom

Re: POLAND

The article says 90M Euro for the four plus training and support package.
by Lord Jim
13 May 2021, 01:16
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: Russian Armed Forces
Replies: 1023
Views: 68384
United Kingdom

Re: Russian Armed Forces

Everybody must pay a fair amount. But we cannot match Russia at the moment as if they stick to buying new kit made in Russia and upgrading older kit by using Russian components they get things done far cheaper than we do. But we must not try to match the mass of the Russian military by relying on te...
by Lord Jim
13 May 2021, 01:10
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: Turkish Armed Forces
Replies: 335
Views: 39637
United Kingdom

Re: Turkish Armed Forces

Well why did the US embargo Turkey in the first place. The latter got its fingers burnt for trying to play nations off against each other. Going after the Kurds, all Kurds regardless of borders hasn't helped either.
by Lord Jim
13 May 2021, 01:03
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
Replies: 856
Views: 307926
United Kingdom

Re: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)

Well the original version was bloody fast and now it is faster!!! Maybe we should equip our surface ships with it as well?
by Lord Jim
13 May 2021, 00:59
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Project Crowsnest (RN)
Replies: 220
Views: 80642
United Kingdom

Re: Project Crowsnest (RN)

Yep the Royal Navy should join up with that programme as soon as possible, and have it also built in the UK, not just for the Royal Navy but the Army and Royal Marines, replacing watchkeeper for the former and providing a full spectrum of support facilities for all three branches covering not just t...
by Lord Jim
13 May 2021, 00:53
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Replies: 19400
Views: 9731127
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion

I know I am definitely on a glass half empty streak at the moment but to me both the T-31 and T-32 are moving the Royal Navy down a dead end street. The Navy like the RAF is really pinning its hopes on unmanned platforms to expand its mass, but in most categories unmanned platforms are still too imm...
by Lord Jim
12 May 2021, 04:54
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: Russian Armed Forces
Replies: 1023
Views: 68384
United Kingdom

Re: Russian Armed Forces

A good point. Equally, the deterrent is v capital intensive: expensive to buy, but cheap to operate. - hence the Treasury should fund the capital cost directly, and the Navy (the proud owner - or tenant, rather) would be happy to fork out the money for 1600 submariners (+ gas, every 30 years or so)...
by Lord Jim
12 May 2021, 04:46
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Replies: 5492
Views: 1554589
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

The ship looks fantastic, I wonder if the rest of the Rivers couldn't be painted in the other WWI and WWII camouflage schemes?
by Lord Jim
11 May 2021, 13:33
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: German Armed Forces
Replies: 596
Views: 47648
United Kingdom

Re: German Armed Forces

I think it may still have the "Smokey" engines that were fitted to the early and mid generation Phantoms.
by Lord Jim
11 May 2021, 11:16
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Replies: 19400
Views: 9731127
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion

Looking at our convoluted plans to finally expand the Royal Navy, with no effort being made to increase the numbers of T-26, instead building first the T-31 and then the T-32, are we accepting that the T-26 is too much of a gold plated design? How can countries with much smaller defence budgets, nam...
by Lord Jim
11 May 2021, 10:53
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: German Armed Forces
Replies: 596
Views: 47648
United Kingdom

Re: German Armed Forces

They are of the opinion that the only new platform that can match or surpass the capabilities of an updated P-3C is a P-8A. On the plus side it might allow the RAF to buy half a dozen or more second hand P-8As in the 2030s for a reasonably price as they introduce the Franco/German platform. So we sh...
by Lord Jim
11 May 2021, 03:28
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 358
Views: 76586
United Kingdom

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Based on what? The MoD are playing that one close to the chest. As they should. Well given that the FCS in the Leopard 2A7V is pretty highly rated as is the improved FCS on the Abrams A2C, and as they are both the same generation we have the best of Europe and the best the USA can offer so my opini...
by Lord Jim
10 May 2021, 21:11
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: German Armed Forces
Replies: 596
Views: 47648
United Kingdom

Re: German Armed Forces

A more light hearted post, a interesting display by a Luftwaffe Phantom F-4F in Malta in 2009. They must have some seriously different regulations for air displays there compared to the UK and most of Europe! Good video though.
by Lord Jim
10 May 2021, 20:42
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Replies: 4067
Views: 989021
United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Like the Army the RAF is looking ten or more years into the future and crossing its fingers as well, though not as tightly as the Army. three E-7s for example allows you to have one protecting UK air space and that is about it. We cannot even refuel them without phoning the USAF at Mildenhall! Maybe...
by Lord Jim
10 May 2021, 20:35
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 358
Views: 76586
United Kingdom

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Well we know the L55 has a higher muzzle velocity than the L44 but I have seen no data to really compare the latest US Army DU round verses the latest Tungsten round. Also does anyone have a comparison between the US and German programable rounds? As for FCS I would say things are even enough to not...
by Lord Jim
10 May 2021, 17:33
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: German Armed Forces
Replies: 596
Views: 47648
United Kingdom

Re: German Armed Forces

There are also plans under the same programme to produce a European replacement for the E-3As used by the NATO AWACS fleet.
by Lord Jim
10 May 2021, 17:30
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: Russian Armed Forces
Replies: 1023
Views: 68384
United Kingdom

Re: Russian Armed Forces

I think everyone on here will agree with you, and in the grand scheme of things the extra £Bns or small numbers compared to what is spent on Health, Welfare and Education. However the voters want ever increasing amounts spent on two of the three which limits the available funds in the Government's P...
by Lord Jim
10 May 2021, 17:23
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: CHINA
Replies: 379
Views: 31830
United Kingdom

Re: CHINA

My nightmare, as I have gotten older the more I like my feet firmly on the ground! :D
by Lord Jim
10 May 2021, 17:21
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 887
Views: 323196
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Royal Artillery Regiments and those of the Horse only between 24 and 32 guns each split between three or four Batteries. Even if you include "Limber" platforms, the numbers required to equip four Regiments and cover training etc. are not that big. We would only need to purchase say 60 Arch...
by Lord Jim
09 May 2021, 19:50
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: Russian Armed Forces
Replies: 1023
Views: 68384
United Kingdom

Re: Russian Armed Forces

Comparisons could be made between Russia under Putin and Hitler's rise to power and his actions up to the start of WW2. Cracking down on any opposition, annexing the territory of neighbouring countries, destabilising these as well and supporting anti governmental factions. You have to admire the way...
by Lord Jim
09 May 2021, 19:40
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: The future form of the Army
Replies: 665
Views: 153579
United Kingdom

Re: The future form of the Army

Well we seem to have finally got a set of logical and effective doctrinal aspiration for how we want the Army to operate in the 2030s but there is little out there on how we are going to get there over the next ten or so years. This leaves too much space for tinkering by people who will be in place ...
by Lord Jim
09 May 2021, 19:14
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: RFA Fort Victoria
Replies: 176
Views: 79125
United Kingdom

Re: RFA Fort Victoria

Lets hope the experiences gathered by Victoria are passed to the FSS team to ensure the aviation facilities at least equal hers and are maybe enhanced to allow the operation of UAVs in addition to 3 "Medium" Helicopters.
by Lord Jim
09 May 2021, 19:09
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 358
Views: 76586
United Kingdom

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Does anyone know if we, the UK, have kept ion developing armour beyond Dorchester that was fitted to the Challenger 2? As for whether the Challenger 3 will be better than the M1A2C or Leopard 2A7Z, I think it will come down to how it is incorporated into a network of weapon Systems rather than how t...
by Lord Jim
09 May 2021, 01:29
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: The future form of the Army
Replies: 665
Views: 153579
United Kingdom

Re: The future form of the Army

Well there must be something added to the weapon system to have the latest referred to as 5th Generation. Weapons like the US Army's replacement for TOW, the French MMP and the latest versions of the Spike family are all referred to as such. Maybe they should be 4.5Gen I do not have full access to t...
by Lord Jim
09 May 2021, 01:10
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 358
Views: 76586
United Kingdom

Re: BAE Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Maybe even less dependant on the size of force that is believed to be required for more regular Operations. I am getting the feeling that deploying a whole Heavy BCT, together with the Deep Strike BCT, is going to be the maximum aspiration for the Army rather than a standard size. Add to this the is...