Or alternatively, that it is completely unfounded , speculative, tosh.SW1 wrote:can only mean it must be closer to the truth than first thought
To be honest, it just looked like a re-cycled article from around 12-15 months ago.
Or alternatively, that it is completely unfounded , speculative, tosh.SW1 wrote:can only mean it must be closer to the truth than first thought
The Raytheon/ Nammo Pike?Timmymagic wrote:.... or the other US small munition ....
I believe they are due to be published on or around next Monday (the week commencing the 18th November), one week before voter registration closes (25th November).ArmChairCivvy wrote:Who cares about the manifestos; anyone seen any ?
..... and just to confuse, they now seem to have reversed that decision (the unilateral bit, that is - they now want a pact) - I guess a day is a long time in politics nowCaribbean wrote:TBP, though they seem to have unilaterally decided to not campaign against the Tories in marginal seats