Search found 5804 matches
- 15 Jul 2021, 22:50
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Foxhound Protected Vehicle
- Replies: 290
- Views: 117190
Re: Foxhound Protected Vehicle
I for one hope this leads to future development integration and orders to equip the light mechanised units among others.
- 15 Jul 2021, 15:50
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: French Armed Forces
- Replies: 1878
- Views: 144370
Re: French Armed Forces
https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/news/en/2021/07/French-force-projection-goes-the-distance-with-Airbus-A400Ms-and-A330-MRTTs.html The rapid transfer of French military forces over long distances – and the ability to arrive ready for immediate, high-intensity operations – was demonstrated by a missio...
- 15 Jul 2021, 14:52
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742576
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Well soon know. When they order the next batch of type 26 we’ll see the cost.
- 15 Jul 2021, 11:38
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: French Armed Forces
- Replies: 1878
- Views: 144370
Re: French Armed Forces
https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/news/en/2021/07/French-force-projection-goes-the-distance-with-Airbus-A400Ms-and-A330-MRTTs.html The rapid transfer of French military forces over long distances – and the ability to arrive ready for immediate, high-intensity operations – was demonstrated by a mission...
- 15 Jul 2021, 11:37
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Foxhound Protected Vehicle
- Replies: 290
- Views: 117190
- 14 Jul 2021, 14:22
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2433
- Views: 539836
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
GD land systems written evidence on Ajax to defence select committee
https://committees.parliament.uk/writte ... 37866/pdf/
https://committees.parliament.uk/writte ... 37866/pdf/
- 14 Jul 2021, 10:33
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1937
- Views: 255412
- 14 Jul 2021, 10:28
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1937
- Views: 255412
- 13 Jul 2021, 22:55
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4463626
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
HMS Diamond has had engine failure apparently
https://www.navylookout.com/hms-diamond ... eployment/
And the carrier group a covid outbreak
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15584882/ ... -outbreak/
https://www.navylookout.com/hms-diamond ... eployment/
And the carrier group a covid outbreak
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15584882/ ... -outbreak/
- 13 Jul 2021, 14:02
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742576
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The escort is there to provide escort. The fact it has gd sensor and command facilities it also has a weapons fit to allow protection of the operations it intends to conduct eg most of what we have done for the past 30 years and those of the future particularly in the area of state backed proxies o...
- 13 Jul 2021, 11:55
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742576
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The type 31 can defend itself against an attack as it’s supposed to it’s not supposed to conduct a war all on its lonesome and seems like a gd fit with a LRG that appears to be moving toward a naval commando special forces type construct. As said the basic LRG has been made up of a LPD , Bay class ...
- 12 Jul 2021, 21:54
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742576
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
And so the usual round and round we go construct an argument a ship any ship must take on the might of an entire countries armed force alone declare said construct lacking and demand more ships, more ships that’s always really the starting point isn’t it. The type 31 can defend itself against an att...
- 11 Jul 2021, 11:04
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: Australian Defence Force
- Replies: 2630
- Views: 754210
Re: Australian Defence Force
I would more be wondering how Australia managed to design and manufacture the vehicle in country. Yet the MOD and army seem incapable of wanting to do similar in this one without salivating over foreign production even though it has had many options to do so.
- 10 Jul 2021, 10:12
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The future form of the Army
- Replies: 665
- Views: 153808
Re: The future form of the Army
Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) Light Brigade It'll be interesting to see which formation provides this capability on importation of Defence Command Paper and Army restructuring? Also interesting to see a French sub-unit involved on an exercise associated with JEF rather than CJEF; albeit I might b...
- 09 Jul 2021, 22:20
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2433
- Views: 539836
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Ahh research ok…. would using them daily count Yep flutter tests are still flown to demonstrate the computer model accuracy funnily enough as Aeroelastic effects are very hard to model. So your company, after a computer simulation predicts a debilitating fault, still goes ahead and builds it just i...
- 08 Jul 2021, 19:24
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2837
- Views: 781798
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
A new protocol required for alpha scrambles, step one move the pm and the press corp
- 08 Jul 2021, 15:59
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2433
- Views: 539836
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Ahh research ok…. would using them daily count
Yep flutter tests are still flown to demonstrate the computer model accuracy funnily enough as Aeroelastic effects are very hard to model.
Yep flutter tests are still flown to demonstrate the computer model accuracy funnily enough as Aeroelastic effects are very hard to model.
- 08 Jul 2021, 14:20
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742576
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I am not arguing against building a balanced fleet but the T31's are a pretty substantial downgrade against the T23's in terms of armament. Short of decision on the next generation of anti ship missile are they? You could argue the gun and missile combination on type 31 is a better balance than tha...
- 07 Jul 2021, 21:57
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2433
- Views: 539836
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
I don’t think there’s a full understanding of what digital engineering tools are for and how there used. The certification process is still the certification process and the product has to be shown to be compliant. Certification authorities will still demand physical proof tests. Digital engineerin...
- 07 Jul 2021, 20:44
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The future form of the Army
- Replies: 665
- Views: 153808
Re: The future form of the Army
https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2021/07/desert-rats-shaping-british-soldiers-for-future-operations/ Exercise Wessex Storm 2021 saw the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) Light Brigade proving their military and modern professional soldiering skills make them fit to deploy anywhere in the w...
- 07 Jul 2021, 20:40
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2433
- Views: 539836
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
I don’t think there’s a full understanding of what digital engineering tools are for and how there used. The certification process is still the certification process and the product has to be shown to be compliant. Certification authorities will still demand physical proof tests. Digital engineering...
- 07 Jul 2021, 14:34
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6099
- Views: 1769170
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
The question as to why the defence secretary outspoken public view on f35 maybe becoming apparent
- 06 Jul 2021, 15:26
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 45 Destroyer (Daring Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 1996
- Views: 568728
- 04 Jul 2021, 11:36
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994289
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-to-help-japan-develop-engine-for-f-x-fighter/ Japanese media has reported that Japan has decided that it will develop the engine for the F-X fighter with help from Britain. Rolls-Royce will partner with Japan’s IHI Corporation and both will also offer the engine fo...
- 02 Jul 2021, 14:56
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
- Replies: 358
- Views: 77501
Re: RBSL Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Of course the US can just activate the defence production act and you don’t get any missiles at all like they have with vaccines and ppe this past year. I mean why would we all need more missiles at the same time…..