Search found 619 matches
- 21 Oct 2015, 00:16
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4460721
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Could be used as decoys or jammers.
- 14 Oct 2015, 21:39
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: UK Defence in Numbers
- Replies: 14
- Views: 685
Re: UK Defence in Numbers
The whole things utter rubbish.
Who did they get to compile it, someone on work experience?
Who did they get to compile it, someone on work experience?
- 11 Oct 2015, 21:18
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Foxhound Protected Vehicle
- Replies: 290
- Views: 117067
Re: Foxhound Protected Vehicle
Plus dark glasses and he's carrying his rifle left handed! Gotta be a yank surely?
- 10 Oct 2015, 20:06
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: de Havilland DH.98 Mosquito (RAF)
- Replies: 24
- Views: 14903
Re: de Havilland DH.98 Mosquito (RAF)
Oops! My mistake. The Beaufort was the Torpedo Bomber from which the Beaufighter was developed. That's what happens when you rely on memory.arfah wrote: whitelancer wrote:
The Beufort was the Hurricane to the Mosquitos Spitfire
Beaufort? Beaufighter, surely
- 03 Oct 2015, 19:49
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: FV3805 Restoration Kickstarter is funded
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6882
Re: FV3805 Restoration Kickstarter is funded
If it was a 5.5 inch gun I assume it was a derivative of the famous 2nd World War artillery piece.
- 23 Sep 2015, 01:24
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
- Replies: 2323
- Views: 1048893
Re: Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (Army)
The Jordanian Challies were Shir 1s,which they called Khalid, basically a modified Chieftain with some elements, notably the engine that were to be part of Shir 2. It was from the Shir 2 that Challenger 1 was derived. Interestingly Shir 2 was quite a bit bigger than Challenger, in particular its wid...
- 20 Sep 2015, 21:02
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5691
- Views: 1493368
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
You still have fixed costs to consider.
- 10 Sep 2015, 22:58
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2433
- Views: 539557
Re: Scout SV Armoured Vehicle Variants (Army)
bobp
Totally agree, what is the fundamental difference between an updated Warrior and Scout!
Even if their is a rational behind the concept of Scout, which I have not heard yet, it has been poorly executed. As I have said before it is too large too heavy and underarmed.
Totally agree, what is the fundamental difference between an updated Warrior and Scout!
Even if their is a rational behind the concept of Scout, which I have not heard yet, it has been poorly executed. As I have said before it is too large too heavy and underarmed.
- 10 Sep 2015, 22:00
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2433
- Views: 539557
Re: Scout SV Armoured Vehicle Variants (Army)
Finally a prototype of Scout. About time considering how much money has already been committed to buying them.
- 31 Aug 2015, 19:59
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: de Havilland DH.98 Mosquito (RAF)
- Replies: 24
- Views: 14903
Re: de Havilland DH.98 Mosquito (RAF)
The Beufort was the Hurricane to the Mosquitos Spitfire
- 25 Aug 2015, 12:18
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: BvS 10 Viking All Terrain Armoured Vehicle
- Replies: 52
- Views: 36560
Re: BvS 10 Viking All Terrain Armoured Vehicle
Always wondered why the Marines never employed CVR(T). A Sqn or Regt attached to 3 Cdo Brigade would have been an ideal compliment, being light mobile with good firepower.
- 13 Aug 2015, 01:09
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4460721
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Enigmatically said The problems the RN has had with deck edge lifts are not actually related to the fact they were deck edge lifts And not being not difficult to enclose is only rhe case if you look at just the deck. If you look lower down the story changes As I understood it the problem was to do ...
- 11 Aug 2015, 22:09
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4460721
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Given the problems the RN has had in the past with deck edge lifts, wouldn't it have been sensible to partially or completely enclose them in the sponsons. Having looked closely at the pics of the lifts it doesn't look as though it would have been too difficult.
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
- 16 Jul 2015, 22:59
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2837
- Views: 780636
Re: Typhoon
Want to see Typhoon, Vulcan the Red Arrows and much more, with a day by the sea thrown in? Try the Bournemouth Air Festival in August.
- 16 Jul 2015, 22:39
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: BAC TSR-2 (Cancelled Project)
- Replies: 67
- Views: 39947
Re: TSR-2 (RAF)
downsizer asked What exact capability did the Bucc have that Tornado didn't then? Surely the question should have been what capability did Tornado have that the Bucc didn't? After all the Buccaneer was their. Their was no need to have spent very large sums of money on Tornado, when much smaller sum...
- 23 Jun 2015, 00:43
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4460721
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Having reconsidered my comments above I realise I have been rather foolish. The article the quote comes from would have been checked and checked again by the MOD before it was released its neither an error or lie. It is in fact a classic case of spin. On first reading I presumed that "That's do...
- 23 Jun 2015, 00:35
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: SDSR 2015 General News & Discussion
- Replies: 632
- Views: 28025
Re: SDSR 2015 / "Defence Cuts" General News & Discussion
The Defence Secretary argues that the UK's military is more than capable of keeping this country safe Today, 4,000 brave and capable men and women of our three Armed Forces are working around the clock on 21 different joint operations in 19 countries. That's double the number five years ago. Just t...
- 22 Jun 2015, 22:34
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4460721
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
If the Secretary of State for Defence can say:- Today, 4,000 brave and capable men and women of our three Armed Forces are working around the clock on 21 different joint operations in 19 countries. That's double the number five years ago. Has he forgotten Afghanistan already? Puts the errors of a ju...
- 22 Jun 2015, 22:07
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: SDSR 2015 General News & Discussion
- Replies: 632
- Views: 28025
Re: SDSR 2015 / "Defence Cuts" General News & Discussion
That's the trouble with politics today, its all about presentation rather than policy. I'm not saying that presentation is not important, it is. Poor presentation can undermine a perfectly good policy. The problem arises when presentation, (spin) is used to hide or disguise a policy or when presenta...
- 22 Jun 2015, 00:47
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: SDSR 2015 General News & Discussion
- Replies: 632
- Views: 28025
Re: SDSR 2015 / "Defence Cuts" General News & Discussion
The Defence Secretary argues that the UK's military is more than capable of keeping this country safe Today, 4,000 brave and capable men and women of our three Armed Forces are working around the clock on 21 different joint operations in 19 countries. That's double the number five years ago. Just t...
- 16 Jun 2015, 01:55
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5691
- Views: 1493368
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Ron 5 wrote What do you guys think a T26 could do with a full electric system that they won't be able to do without one? I would have thought it would save having to fit what must be a very large, complicated and expensive gearbox to change from electric to direct drive. It would also allow the use...
- 16 Jun 2015, 00:56
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4460721
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
R686 wrote as said before unless going into a high threat area there is no need to put a 3rd of your T45 force when you can get away with 2/3 Type23-26. It costs money to end out a top shelf CBG all the time. Yes it costs money, a lot of it, to create proper CBGs. But not spending the money means w...
- 15 Jun 2015, 01:36
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5691
- Views: 1493368
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
What extra kit do you need? You would need to fit larger electric motors, not that much more expensive. Have a generator attached to the MT30 but you would do away with a complicated gear box, which is probable very expensive. I just can't see where all the extra expense is. Its potentially more eff...
- 15 Jun 2015, 01:19
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4460721
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
The above replies seem to suggest that you can throw together any old group of warships and they will preform perfectly together. This has been proved not to be the case. A properly worked up force which trains and operates together has always proved superior to one put together at the last minute o...
- 14 Jun 2015, 23:24
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5691
- Views: 1493368
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Why is a full electric propulsion system more expensive than the CODELOG system on T26?
I would have thought it was both more flexible and more efficient.
I would have thought it was both more flexible and more efficient.