Search found 1261 matches
- 06 Apr 2024, 00:43
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Post-war British Aviation - [Fantasy and Speculation]
- Replies: 32
- Views: 3008
Re: Post-war British Aviation - [Fantasy and Speculation]
Stealth has become the new "Mach 2+ capability". Assumed to be vital for every platform irrespective of cost. That the USN operates an outrageously expensive (2x F-35A and rising), low-observation, tanker drone is perhaps the peak of modern combat air vogue... 1) It is quite essential for...
- 30 Mar 2024, 16:53
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 743
- Views: 199895
- 28 Mar 2024, 13:43
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Naval Auxiliaries (MOD Chartered/Leased)
- Replies: 22
- Views: 11060
Re: Naval Auxiliaries (MOD Chartered/Leased)
The USV/Workboat is Still onboard apon departure to cape town.
- 28 Mar 2024, 07:25
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4454140
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
The man above is notorious in not just UK defence field, Not just the international defence field, but also in basically every other place for being a absolute content channel which puts the least amount of effort into there video's to get as much videos out for more and more sponsorship's and add r...
- 27 Mar 2024, 20:55
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Naval Auxiliaries (MOD Chartered/Leased)
- Replies: 22
- Views: 11060
Re: Naval Auxiliaries (MOD Chartered/Leased)
Either a work boat or a USV is being carried by Anvil Point as seen in pic 3
- 27 Mar 2024, 07:13
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
- Replies: 394
- Views: 158567
Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
taking less?
Being more vulnerable?
taking a day to get there?
Being more vulnerable?
taking a day to get there?
- 26 Mar 2024, 23:45
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5672
- Views: 1489381
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Remember Norway has a programme for new frigates
- 25 Mar 2024, 21:22
- Forum: Conflicts
- Topic: The war in Ukraine
- Replies: 1164
- Views: 96432
Re: The war in Ukraine
The L3Harris Vampire system with its stabilised multi-sensor sight and advanced image processing firing the 70mm APKWS (over 50,000 delivered) with the BAE Inc laser-guided kit achieving success in Ukraine, think it might be the cheapest CIWS system yet for shooting down drones, several orders of m...
- 25 Mar 2024, 19:54
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Apache Attack Helicopter (British Army Air Corps)
- Replies: 614
- Views: 214957
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (British Army Air Corps)
Any possibility (or sense) in transferring our remaining (16 I think I have read) AH64D to Ukraine? Obviously there would need to be US permission, a training programme and it might be thought desirable to remove or downgrade the Longbow radar but ultimately Ukraine is currently operating their exi...
- 24 Mar 2024, 08:58
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
I don’t want to turn this into another discussion about aircraft carriers… Fair, and don’t want to kick off the same circular discussions either. What I would add though is that I see a CVF as “4 acres of floating sovereign territory” - it should be seen in the same way as any forward operating air...
- 23 Mar 2024, 09:23
- Forum: Personnel and Units
- Topic: RN manpower issues
- Replies: 9
- Views: 951
Re: RN manpower issues
For the navy, it's issue isn't inflow of people: It's actually getting them in and keeping them
- 22 Mar 2024, 07:36
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254255
- 19 Mar 2024, 23:48
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6097
- Views: 1762022
- 18 Mar 2024, 22:32
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
….I don't think UK will order 4 LHP/LHD, even 1 would be a miracle. IMO there are two ways forward here. 1. Build a single large 40,000t LHD to replace the Albions. Add a 12x F35 capability to enable a LHA role and rotate with the 2x CVFs ensuring permanent F35 availability. Clearly the current set...
- 18 Mar 2024, 22:09
- Forum: Personnel and Units
- Topic: Ranger Regiment (British Army)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 516
Re: Ranger Regiment (British Army)
691 in 3 years??? Sure as hell sounds like a lot. that one every 1 and a half days.
- 18 Mar 2024, 21:56
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
What is it not enough helicopters or that they take up more space If FAA, not enough to justify LPH. If RAF/AAC, aircraft have to big footprint to fit many on LPH to justify size of LPH. cost QE is affordable after all there is little hope that the alternative collection of vessels will be less tha...
- 18 Mar 2024, 18:06
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
1) Cost a hell of a lot more, but you ask for a new 1 of 1 QE class sized vessel with capacity for vehicles and marines for less than what a QE carrier cost? Not like we have enough helicopters for it anyways... 2) You are utterly delusional if you think we can have 2 ships of 3 constantly n deploy...
- 18 Mar 2024, 17:34
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
- 18 Mar 2024, 16:47
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
- 18 Mar 2024, 16:42
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
1) So if in a combined group why would it matter if each individual platform is does not accel in any particular area if the total is the same? 2) We don't have enough carriers to do continuous CSG ops so your solution is to use those vessels as a back up for your fragile amphibious strategy? 3) So...
- 17 Mar 2024, 22:03
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
... one large flat deck LPH ... One LPH would not be enough. Current plan for RM is to have 2 LRG, one in the North and one in the South (Mediterranean/Indo-Pacific). Each one is supposed to have two amphibious ships. So if RN wants/could afford LHD/LPH, it would need at least two, one for each gro...
- 17 Mar 2024, 22:02
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
1) Compromised how? 2) One LPH so it's only available at readiness or in operation 1/2 of the time? 3) The stores the FSS carries are quite different to those an amphibious operation would carry no? 1) 3 Merlin’s not enough for a OTH assault, 2 LCUs too few for an other beach operation. Yes you cou...
- 17 Mar 2024, 20:31
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5672
- Views: 1489381
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Putting this on record because I've been contacted a couple of times. Yes, the flight to capture HMS Glasgow was undertaken in a no fly zone. Yes, it was near the airport. However, it also had full permission and police awareness. The footage and imagery is legal. Feel really sorry for you George w...
- 17 Mar 2024, 19:47
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Let’s forget about six MRSS, even if they could be afforded a single class would either result in a compromised class that can’t do everything or gaps in capability. My vote, one large flat deck LPH, an additional FSS and confirmation of replacements for the Point Class (going back up to six). 1) C...
- 17 Mar 2024, 12:41
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6158
- Views: 1866039
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
I agree on TB3.Tempest414 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2024, 10:47 As said many times Drones like TB2 & TB3 could operate from these ships but the point being as Tec moves on at pace
I can also flip the question and say why not have a flat top LPD ?
Don't see how your flipping the question with flat top LPD.