Search found 1079 matches
- 08 Jan 2024, 12:09
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2837
- Views: 782107
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
It will be interesting to see the size of the order. A quick google shows the Saudis currently operating 80 F15C/Ds with an average age of 37 years. It could be substantial, especially given the threat situation. Even 48 would lead nicely into GCAP, 8-12 per year from say 2025 plus support of German...
- 08 Jan 2024, 10:26
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2837
- Views: 782107
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
I'm pretty sure KSA still wants Typhoon (and Tempest for that matter). BAE are deeply embedded in the country industrially, economically. The Saudis have long memories. There's also, hate to say it, the small matter that the Dassault family are Jewish and the company was Israel's main supplier for m...
- 07 Jan 2024, 23:51
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2837
- Views: 782107
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
TBH I don't give a damn about Turkey
But we've been selling fighters to KSA since the 60s. And their enemy, the Houthi, are right now holding global trade to ransom
But we've been selling fighters to KSA since the 60s. And their enemy, the Houthi, are right now holding global trade to ransom
- 05 Jan 2024, 23:09
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 83 Destroyer (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 324
- Views: 176527
Re: Type 83 Destroyer (RN) [News Only]
Stretch a T26-derived hull just enough to squeeze in another MT30, without going back to square one No such thing. Ships are built around their propulsion, there's no way adding another MT30 happens without going back to square 1. Thanks. I was wondering. The BAE design teams likely need something ...
- 05 Jan 2024, 21:44
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 83 Destroyer (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 324
- Views: 176527
Re: Type 83 Destroyer (RN) [News Only]
BAE do seem to be cracking on. I'm wondering if some of the redesign work they have been doing on Hunter leads directly into T83/FADS - increasing the Beam for example. I think the 165metre estimate may be bang on the money. Stretch a T26-derived hull just enough to squeeze in another MT30, without ...
- 05 Jan 2024, 13:44
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: M777 Portee DVD 2016
- Replies: 113
- Views: 30502
- 04 Jan 2024, 20:27
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9743640
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
A bit of a random thought - is there any role for USVs in the mix? Glorified decoy, draw the drones away, maybe a remotely operated starstreak or two? Or is this a dumb idea
- 04 Jan 2024, 19:20
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Interesting, that range is enough for a return trip from Tel-Aviv to Baghdad or Dharan airbase to Tehran, with about a 10% margin.
Almost as if it may have been a design objective
Almost as if it may have been a design objective
- 03 Jan 2024, 18:35
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
It certainly looks that way. On the sidelines there must have been some discussions around division of labor. IMHO it's about time for Australia to have a export defence platform again, after Ikara and Jindivik. Will help solidify support for AUKUS and maybe sell GCAP
- 01 Jan 2024, 10:39
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest
Just a quick new year’s thought exercise - so I’m not saying I’m favour - if size and range are the edge Tempest is bringing to the table over F-35 A ( or future upgraded F35 Block X/F-35D). Would it be worth exploring an improved version of what Justin Bronk (I know he tends to shill for the US av...
- 30 Dec 2023, 20:06
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
MQ28 Ghost Bat?
Not that I'd support that, we really need to have sovereign capability, but you could see the political attraction, and the Boeing lobby.
Not that I'd support that, we really need to have sovereign capability, but you could see the political attraction, and the Boeing lobby.
- 30 Dec 2023, 20:00
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1559778
Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Message sent
- 30 Dec 2023, 19:59
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
- Replies: 358
- Views: 77524
Re: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
It's starting to sound alot like a new tank....
I bet it ends up with a new chassis
I bet it ends up with a new chassis
- 30 Dec 2023, 12:20
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
The range issue is a real and present one when you consider the UK and Japan, though 'slightly' more puzzling regarding Italy.... Looking into my 2040 crystal ball... Libya - failed state - massive gas reserves. A nice man from Beijing turns up offering a multi billion investment package .....
- 30 Dec 2023, 11:59
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Realistically Israel and the Saudis are de facto allies and Israel's qualitative edge was pretty much non existent until 2018. F15 + F16 vs F15 + Typhoon incl Meteor. If KSA adopts GCAP - and they have 200 F15s that will need replacing sooner or later - and Israel use that to leverage themselves int...
- 29 Dec 2023, 10:32
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
The gripen e isn’t that small in physical size in terms of fast jets. I still do not really see how people are scaling the aircraft with what they’ve made public when they continually talk about it being huge in size. Is it physical size, weight or range or something else. The Italian requirement i...
- 28 Dec 2023, 10:46
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
The graphic in the telegraph (I know I know) listed GCAP as having a length of 18.9 metres, which would indicate F22 size
Maybe the journalist pulled the figure out of the ether but I thought at the time it looks oddly specific for a guess
Maybe the journalist pulled the figure out of the ether but I thought at the time it looks oddly specific for a guess
- 27 Dec 2023, 17:47
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Work with Boeing on a scaled up T7? Gripen E with a Tempest engine?
- 15 Dec 2023, 13:02
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Morpheus Cancelled
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1166
- 14 Dec 2023, 13:28
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
More on the Convention - the question of partners vetoing exports to non-partners is kicked down the road: ARTICLE 51 (1) The Parties shall create and maintain a common mechanism for facilitating exports of GCAP systems, subsystems, and technology to non-Parties. Such a mechanism shall be described...
- 14 Dec 2023, 13:12
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Noteworthy report. https://news.sky.com/story/uk-signs-deal-with-japan-and-italy-to-build-next-generation-fighter-jets-in-britain-13029959 I read a lot of the convention. I don't like it. I hope it is not implemented in its current form. Why? Principally because it sets out to protect the project f...
- 10 Dec 2023, 18:26
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9743640
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
"T31-as-is" is a T31 with a 57mm gun, 2x 40mm guns, 12-24x CAMM, SeaSentor STDS, 3x RHIBs, a Wildcat, with NS100 radar and so-so ESM/ECM decoy kits. How accurate is this anymore? I don’t think anyone knows for sure. No additional information. And, at this stage, no additional money is all...
- 09 Dec 2023, 21:37
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
I suspect that there have been back channels to Labor If not by the government itself then likely by the Treasury as part of their due diligence The Unions seem to be on board - and they've basically got the votes https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/unite-the-union-calls-for-sustained-investment-in-uk-a...
- 07 Dec 2023, 18:46
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
True. Withe right attitude the legal structure is irrelevant
- 07 Dec 2023, 13:26
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 994796
Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
What if it something like NETMA more than MBDA/Airbus or other multinational companies. They Key wording i think it is "inter-goverment". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Eurofighter_and_Tornado_Management_Agency Then it's back to being a consortium. I think that is absolutely the wro...