Search found 1716 matches
- 09 Apr 2019, 00:21
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6157
- Views: 1865674
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
I'm OK with most of this. However, I still think that the Albion replacements will be a pair of LHDs (circa 35k Tonnes) with maximum automation to reduce the manning requirements as far as is sensible.
- 09 Apr 2019, 00:06
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: AW101 Merlin Helicopter (RN)
- Replies: 513
- Views: 316844
Re: Merlin helicopters
Or hopefully to buy some MV22 Osprey to perform the ASAC role, making more Merlins available for ASW.
- 08 Apr 2019, 18:03
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: Indian Armed Forces
- Replies: 342
- Views: 23023
Re: Indian Armed Forces
What will they be calling it, Chernobyl?
- 06 Apr 2019, 23:08
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
- Replies: 595
- Views: 187497
Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
An ever present danger that strategically illiterate politicians will allow (or want) this to happen. So I am afraid could not bring myself to "like" the previous post.
- 04 Apr 2019, 21:12
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: UK Shipbuilding
- Replies: 244
- Views: 30861
Re: UK Shipbuilding
No. 5 Drydock would appear to be large enough for a QEC Aircraft Carrier.
- 03 Apr 2019, 02:45
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Bay Class Landing Ship Dock (LSD (A)) (RFA)
- Replies: 367
- Views: 199193
Re: Bay Class Landing Ship Dock (LSD (A)) (RFA)
And the Fly Boys can't even tell where you are. Good job you are not a "Man Overboard" because if they are looking for you 500 miles away, they would never find you!
- 03 Apr 2019, 00:39
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4453360
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
More streamlined?
- 03 Apr 2019, 00:38
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2196259
Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]
All power to their elbow. Who knows, they may eventually regain the competence to build SSKs as well. Sorry, possibly a bit of a crossover for this topic!
- 03 Apr 2019, 00:34
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Bay Class Landing Ship Dock (LSD (A)) (RFA)
- Replies: 367
- Views: 199193
Re: Bay Class Landing Ship Dock (LSD (A)) (RFA)
Only one of the many examples of political incompetence demonstrated by that government. I'm only surprised that they did not rename one of the great offices of state as the Secretary of State for ***********ness.
- 01 Apr 2019, 02:06
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: French Armed Forces
- Replies: 1878
- Views: 143393
Re: French Armed Forces
So what are the E3 Hawkeyes then? Never say Never!
- 29 Mar 2019, 08:49
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2837
- Views: 776422
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Those living there will then complain about the noise from Lakenheath.
- 28 Mar 2019, 18:45
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1552825
Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Well (for a ship) it would be better than calling it a T-bird or a Mustang.
- 28 Mar 2019, 13:23
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Future Littoral Strike Ships
- Replies: 888
- Views: 364814
Re: Future Littoral Strike Ships
Simplistic perhaps, but how about using a Bay class as the basis with the minimum alterations required (acquiring 2 x additional "Bays" of course).
- 27 Mar 2019, 04:02
- Forum: Political Discussions
- Topic: Brexit - The UK's EU Referendum & Withdrawal
- Replies: 4600
- Views: 122479
Re: Brexit - The UK's EU Referendum & Withdrawal
Any MP who votes to frustrate the "will of the people" as expressed in the 2016 referendum will indeed be a fool!
- 25 Mar 2019, 20:20
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254186
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
Better still would be to link it to the pay rises for MP's ...... Whatever pay rise they get, Defence gets 5 x their rate of increase.
- 25 Mar 2019, 10:32
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254186
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
Also the growth of the Defence "black hole".
- 25 Mar 2019, 03:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254186
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
It is what I have always believed should be the case. The 0.7% GDP was simply a feel-good, tick in the box solution to salve the conscience of people who should never have been allowed to be anywhere near government.
- 21 Mar 2019, 22:24
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4453360
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Depends whether they are at Action Stations, Emergency Stations, Off-watch or elsewhere.
- 20 Mar 2019, 01:58
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6157
- Views: 1865674
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
So the only nations operating or acquiring LHDs are the odd ones out are they? United States Australia France Italy Perhaps you would rather do away with the F35B, then there would be no possibility of the suggested Albion class replacements operating fixed wing aircraft at all (unless the US, via t...
- 18 Mar 2019, 08:43
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19400
- Views: 9726746
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The decision to slow the drumbeat was taken by people who know only the price of things, but not their value!
- 18 Mar 2019, 02:25
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19400
- Views: 9726746
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Much better would be additional SSNs, with just the possibility that one or more of them MIGHT be in the vicinity. For this to be really credible however, would require the SSN fleet to be increased by at least 3+. The advantage would be that in fact they could well be SOMEWHERE ELSE ALTOGETHER. :mr...
- 17 Mar 2019, 09:24
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19400
- Views: 9726746
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Any politician who even half-heartedly thinks about the possibility of overseeing such a reduction in our Naval force
levels (No Frigates indeed) should resign now, because clearly they would be unworthy of the position that they occupy. Save this drivel for April 01 please.
levels (No Frigates indeed) should resign now, because clearly they would be unworthy of the position that they occupy. Save this drivel for April 01 please.
- 14 Mar 2019, 20:18
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254186
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
Exactly, which is why it is vitally important that both manpower and equipment budgets are substantially increased, because at present we are seriously lacking in both of them.
- 13 Mar 2019, 00:04
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4453360
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
27 Aircraft on board (1 from each EU member state, I suppose)? Can you imagine the menu in the JRs Dining Hall ? Perhaps it will even be a U-Carrier ? Which language will be used for communication ? What does it matter, they will probably be U-AVs ? And all this from the leader of a country that no ...
- 05 Mar 2019, 13:17
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Future Solid Support Ship
- Replies: 1972
- Views: 564263
Re: Future Solid Support Ship
It is those who are adjudicating the various tenders from the interested companies and then "awarding" the contracts that cannot take a wider view of the actual benefits or otherwise of each bid. Looking at the bottom line only is very easy, but the "easy" decision is almost alwa...