Search found 1149 matches

by wargame_insomniac
18 Nov 2023, 18:22
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Replies: 8490
Views: 2197313
United Kingdom

Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]

Soft 'kill' doesn't kill it. So while it's useful for a Singleton unit to deflect a Missile, it's not very helpful if your in a Fleet situation. Ask Atlantic Conveyor. Deflect if you can't kill, but you might piss your neighbour off. What worries me is the increase in Anti-Ship Missile threats from...
by wargame_insomniac
18 Nov 2023, 17:40
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Wave Class Tanker (RFA)
Replies: 208
Views: 125253
United Kingdom

Re: Wave Class Tanker (RFA)

Assuming that the 4*Tides and future 3*FSS ae required to support the two carriers and LRG(N) then I am in favour of (evntually) having a couple of ships like the current Waves or the afore mentioned BMT Aegir logistic support vessels, or even the previous initial version of BMT Ellida multi-role lo...
by wargame_insomniac
17 Nov 2023, 19:02
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: UK Shipbuilding
Replies: 244
Views: 30889
United Kingdom

Re: UK Shipbuilding

SW1 wrote: 17 Nov 2023, 14:32
This would be perfect for H&W Appledore and would increase the portfolio of UK ship designs that we could offer to potential export customers.
by wargame_insomniac
16 Nov 2023, 23:29
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Replies: 19400
Views: 9730524
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion

Shouldn’t we get some design indications for T83 in the next year or so? If the RAN take up BAE Australia's proposal for a Hunter Class Batch 2 AAW variant, then I would say that is a front-runner fot RN's T83 design. Although I would still like to see at least one more T26 ASW added to current Gov...
by wargame_insomniac
16 Nov 2023, 21:16
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
Replies: 1936
Views: 254353
United Kingdom

Re: General UK Defence Discussion

As the 1SL made clear dauntless was sent to the Caribbean at the direction of the armed forces minister as he wanted a major surface vessel in the region to support wider security tasks and a presence in the hurricane season. The tasks the general purpose frigates were supposed to undertake except ...
by wargame_insomniac
16 Nov 2023, 20:49
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
Replies: 1936
Views: 254353
United Kingdom

Re: General UK Defence Discussion

Why do we need constant operation? Why do we cry over capability gaps then? They are the same, at different scales. What I mean is readiness doesn't matter over ships actually being used. Capability gaps are not the same as constant operation. We have a capability gap on E3 Sentry AEW for example, ...
by wargame_insomniac
14 Nov 2023, 20:50
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
Replies: 743
Views: 200426
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

The Army has procured this for the moment: https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2023/06/game-changing-anti-drone-weapon-sight-for-army-s-close-combat-soldiers/#:~:text=The%20capability%20can%20recognise%20a,other%20in%2Dservice%20individual%20weapons. 225? What's that? One per platoon? I pr...
by wargame_insomniac
09 Nov 2023, 21:52
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
Replies: 743
Views: 200426
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Great to see the building relationship between UK and Poland on GBAD.

If the Poles are to have 24 batteries, then I wonder how many we will have....
:(

by wargame_insomniac
09 Nov 2023, 21:45
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Replies: 6097
Views: 1763328
United Kingdom

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

Some delayed but long awaited good news with standing up of 809 NAS:

by wargame_insomniac
09 Nov 2023, 21:20
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: Australian Defence Force
Replies: 2630
Views: 753243
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

here you go: According to BAE the up-armed, Batch II Hunter, maintains 85% commonality with the existing ships that are under construction at Osborne, South Australia. The most significant difference is the removal of the Thales Sonar 2087 towed array and various other unspecified Anti-Submarine Wa...
by wargame_insomniac
08 Nov 2023, 18:59
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Replies: 19400
Views: 9730524
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future scussion

8ac625bbe4f906407be4bf8a83b7585e.jpeg That's a very angry looking T26! The Royal Navy has two good options for a future destroyer, and the time to study them. The improved Hunter is a great option with high commonality and industrial continuity. The more radical approaches sound more appealing if t...
by wargame_insomniac
06 Nov 2023, 19:27
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Replies: 5674
Views: 1490124
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]

donald_of_tokyo wrote: 06 Nov 2023, 15:13 HMS Cardiff under build is "covered" in ~50% of the area. Almost totally covered... Interesting, as a temporary measure.
Polystyrene as the new stealth coating??!! 😁😊
by wargame_insomniac
05 Nov 2023, 18:17
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: UK Shipbuilding
Replies: 244
Views: 30889
United Kingdom

Re: UK Shipbuilding

Yes, I also left Barrow because it will be doing it's own thing, a.k.a all the subs. As for appledore I would turn it into a Tier 3 (MCMV, MROSS, GPV, OPV, e.c.t) maintenance place as babcock does more and more construction and submarine deconstruction. This has been demonstrated with the MCMV's to...
by wargame_insomniac
04 Nov 2023, 19:25
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: UK Shipbuilding
Replies: 244
Views: 30889
United Kingdom

Re: UK Shipbuilding

£1.2bn, across 3 yards. Babcock for smaller stuff, H&W for the large things, Glasgow for the fighty things. How would you split it? 1 ship per yard per year? £400m each? e.c.t. what is that, 1 large ship / support ship, 1 escort ship, 2 minor vessels per year. Making the assumption that you spl...
by wargame_insomniac
04 Nov 2023, 17:54
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Replies: 6163
Views: 1866739
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion

Whilst I like what you have proposed, I fear it is too ambitious this side of 2030. I don't know enough about your costings but am more interested in the differing crew requirements for the three ship designs that you proposed. Im not really proposing it, simply pointing out that the 6x MRSS plan i...
by wargame_insomniac
03 Nov 2023, 19:24
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Replies: 6163
Views: 1866739
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion

I can't see us ever having 4 Flattops it is just to much but buying one LPH would allow for two duty carriers to be active one in the Strike role and the other in LPH and this is the best we can hope for along side say 4 x 200 by 30 meter MRSS and 5 x 100 by 12 meter SLV's Im not sure about that, R...
by wargame_insomniac
02 Nov 2023, 20:52
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Replies: 4067
Views: 988709
United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Personal take - Italy will always find the money for a top end product. Always. Despite all of the ups and downs of Italian politics over the last 50 years Ferrari never went out of production, neither did Ducati, Riva, Benelli, Oto-Melara, Agusta, Fincantieri. It doesn't matter where they have to ...
by wargame_insomniac
02 Nov 2023, 18:40
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Replies: 6163
Views: 1866739
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion

Fine as far as it goes, however what happens when either the MRSS Role 3 or the LHA//LHD goes in for a deep re-fit (especially if it is an LHD)? One solution to the Role 3 problem might be to modularise it, so that it could then be available aboard any of the 4 x MRSS as and when required. The only...
by wargame_insomniac
01 Nov 2023, 18:13
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Replies: 6163
Views: 1866739
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion

Basically the above is advocating life extension over renewal. It's reasonable, and pushes the problem further down the road, running old ships harder for longer, like the Navy is struggling to do with the T23's. I'm not convinced this is better than selling off ships and building new ones, like th...
by wargame_insomniac
31 Oct 2023, 19:07
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Replies: 19400
Views: 9730524
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion

Scimitar54 wrote: 30 Oct 2023, 22:14 Just one reason why 8 x T26 is not an adequate number.
I agree - I would like at least one more T26.
by wargame_insomniac
30 Oct 2023, 19:23
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Replies: 19400
Views: 9730524
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion

For me what is needed is a mix of capabilities so starting with the LRG out at 80km's off the coast with say 2 escorts with 127mm main gun firing Volcano rounds out to 90+ Km's plus 2 x Amphibs with M270A2's with say GSDB firing out to 150Km's next up would be RM launching Hero 120 loiter weapon's ...
by wargame_insomniac
30 Oct 2023, 17:55
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Replies: 6163
Views: 1866739
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion

https://www.navylookout.com/bmt-develop-second-generation-ellida-multi-role-and-logistic-vessel-concept/ I really liked the original BMT ELLIDA design. Having say half of the planned 6*MRSS with logistics and refuelling would have been some even partial replacement of the capability offered by the ...
by wargame_insomniac
28 Oct 2023, 20:23
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
Replies: 1936
Views: 254353
United Kingdom

Re: General UK Defence Discussion

Intresting look on 2nd page at UK (and French and US) bases across the Indo-Pacific.
And also the 3rd page at interrelationships between:
Quad / AUKUS / FPDA / ASEAN

by wargame_insomniac
26 Oct 2023, 21:50
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]
Replies: 1013
Views: 436126
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Some good news if St Albans getting ready for active service.
Another precious T23 ASW finishing LIFEX.