Search found 1359 matches

by RunningStrong
30 Jan 2024, 13:51
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
Replies: 743
Views: 203306

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

I get how it works :D I'm not entirely sure you do. It's not difficult for a person to follow a moving target through sights, but becomes challenging for the user to perform the necessary ballistic compensation for range and movement. The system does this for the user. The system is also only a fir...
by RunningStrong
29 Jan 2024, 19:56
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
Replies: 743
Views: 203306

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

The Army has procured this for the moment: https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2023/06/game-changing-anti-drone-weapon-sight-for-army-s-close-combat-soldiers/#:~:text=The%20capability%20can%20recognise%20a,other%20in%2Dservice%20individual%20weapons. In all honesty, what are the chances of...
by RunningStrong
22 Jan 2024, 19:57
Forum: British Army
Topic: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
Replies: 2823
Views: 746117

Re: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)

Industry has no appetite for accepting any risk in the supply chain. MoD has burned way too many matches on promises of large fleets and then placing small orders (AJAX, Foxhound etc etc). Then out that in the context of government finances and election year and no wonder they've put little effort i...
by RunningStrong
19 Jan 2024, 08:47
Forum: British Army
Topic: UK Mobile Fires Platform
Replies: 97
Views: 13237

Re: UK Mobile Fires Platform

I'd rather went all in on M119A3 than continue anything more on the L118. That would give us commonality within AUKUS and commonwealth.

M777 way, way too expensive for reservist play thing. Give them high quality simulators and make assets available for live firing quarterly.
by RunningStrong
17 Jan 2024, 16:39
Forum: British Army
Topic: M777 Portee DVD 2016
Replies: 113
Views: 30542

Re: M777 Portee DVD 2016

That looks like a rehash that uses the same assumptions that others have made.
by RunningStrong
16 Jan 2024, 22:36
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: SSN-AUKUS Future Astute Replacement (2030s) (RN) [News Only]
Replies: 249
Views: 93054

Re: SSN-AUKUS Future Astute Replacement (2030s) (RN) [News Only]

Rolls Royce site to open in Cardiff? Supposedly on AUKUS work. Not far from Bristol but not a hotbed of submarine, nuclear or defence in itself.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wale ... e-28458142
by RunningStrong
14 Jan 2024, 19:18
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 894
Views: 325388

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Timmymagic wrote: 14 Jan 2024, 09:52 If the Army have a braincell they'll purchase 2 Decoy systems for every Real one...
Counter-intelligence batteries have been discussed recently by a few people with experience.
by RunningStrong
12 Jan 2024, 11:20
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Replies: 5492
Views: 1560666

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Do we need to revisit the OPV armament in of Yemen and consider LMM or CAMM?

https://www.navylookout.com/enhancing-t ... h-ii-opvs/
by RunningStrong
05 Jan 2024, 21:14
Forum: British Army
Topic: M777 Portee DVD 2016
Replies: 113
Views: 30542

Re: M777 Portee DVD 2016

leonard wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:01 It is now official the production line of the M777 will be restarted the contract has just been notified.
https://x.com/jpartej/status/1742919384337973482?s=20
Nothing official that Barrow will be restarted...
by RunningStrong
05 Jan 2024, 10:46
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 894
Views: 325388

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Timmymagic wrote: 05 Jan 2024, 09:33
RunningStrong wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:18 Any guarantee the work will take place at Barrow?
Thats where it was done previously and where all of the experience in the titanium fabrication is. Pretty much nailed on.
I guess the equipment is still there but how much of that knowledge and skill has gone to the wind over the years?
by RunningStrong
04 Jan 2024, 16:18
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 894
Views: 325388

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Any guarantee the work will take place at Barrow?
by RunningStrong
26 Dec 2023, 07:58
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Advice joining Uk forces
Replies: 8
Views: 558

Re: Advice joining Uk forces

I’ve heard that unfortunately she was turned down by the army due to asthma. I don’t have the full story, but I was quite surprised as whilst I knew she had it, it’s never been particularly serious AFAIK. She’s always been pretty sporty and it’s never been an issue in any of that and it seemed to m...
by RunningStrong
15 Dec 2023, 17:18
Forum: British Army
Topic: Morpheus Cancelled
Replies: 6
Views: 1167

Re: Morpheus Cancelled

BB85 wrote: 15 Dec 2023, 14:29 SOTAS from Thales is used by 30 countries. How many countries use Bowman?
2. But then the USP of BOWMAN is very UK-centric due to typical MoD requirements management.

I wonder if Thales would run a UK SOTAS business from their Ebbw Vale offices.
by RunningStrong
15 Dec 2023, 13:32
Forum: British Army
Topic: Morpheus Cancelled
Replies: 6
Views: 1167

Re: Morpheus Cancelled

What BOWMAN equivalent CIS is there?
by RunningStrong
11 Dec 2023, 14:58
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 894
Views: 325388

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Interesting that they are offering 8x8 archer but RDUK Elbit turret is on 10x10 chassis.
by RunningStrong
04 Dec 2023, 20:21
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2433
Views: 540053

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

Interesting. On Astute the main payment milestone was handover, and it's a much lumpier product. Long lead items were generally purchased by the MOD directly and provided to BAE as segregated Project stock ie GFE. That's a different contract model. Aside from the Cannon which was GFx, GD have to bu...
by RunningStrong
01 Dec 2023, 19:30
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2433
Views: 540053

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

"With an initial payment of £480 million, withheld since December 2020 due to challenges with noise and vibration, the MOD will resume payments to General Dynamics as the vehicles are scheduled to enter initial operating capability between July and December 2025" I'd still like to see har...
by RunningStrong
28 Nov 2023, 23:13
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2433
Views: 540053

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

highlighted the progress made since the contract amendment in September What is this contract amendment for? Does it effect the fixed price nature of the contract? https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ajax-vehicles-on-course-for-new-delivery-times#:~:text=Subject%20to%20contract%20amendment%2C%20upda...
by RunningStrong
28 Nov 2023, 22:17
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2433
Views: 540053

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

Look at all those hulls!

by RunningStrong
22 Nov 2023, 20:58
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 329823

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

Did we do the "UK thing" and specially bespoke modify ours, so we can't simply fit the turret systems already developed, I wouldn't put it past the MOD.... Boxer is modular at the mission module, so you'd have to "simply fit" the IFV mission module. The IFV mission module with U...
by RunningStrong
22 Nov 2023, 14:54
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 329823

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

Looks like market is split then with Thales LSAS cameras on Non-RDUK/RBSL, and REUK fitted on RBSL products.
by RunningStrong
21 Nov 2023, 06:16
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 358
Views: 77595

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)

There was an exchange at the defence committee with the VCDS and defence secretary that seemed to suggest there is insufficient challenger 2 hulls in an acceptable material state to perhaps event meet the 148 upgrade number let alone anymore than that. There was no pushback to this suggestion from ...
by RunningStrong
20 Nov 2023, 21:44
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 358
Views: 77595

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)

There was an exchange at the defence committee with the VCDS and defence secretary that seemed to suggest there is insufficient challenger 2 hulls in an acceptable material state to perhaps event meet the 148 upgrade number let alone anymore than that. There was no pushback to this suggestion from ...
by RunningStrong
16 Nov 2023, 14:15
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2433
Views: 540053

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

For some reason I always thought the storage bins on the side opened down the way which is why there is a huge overhang. I know it's just aesthetics but always thought Ajax looked odd versus CV90 and Lynx that either don't use storage boxes on the side or have lower panels which makes them flush on...
by RunningStrong
14 Nov 2023, 11:33
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
Replies: 743
Views: 203306

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

The Army has procured this for the moment: https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2023/06/game-changing-anti-drone-weapon-sight-for-army-s-close-combat-soldiers/#:~:text=The%20capability%20can%20recognise%20a,other%20in%2Dservice%20individual%20weapons. Great as that is, I can see there being...