Search found 793 matches
- 01 Dec 2023, 17:45
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 17954
- Views: 3667305
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
With all the recent investment in U.K. yards combined with the rising experience levels as the programs proceed there is no reason why building naval vessels in the U.K. is going to be automatically more expensive than other advanced European economies with comparable labour costs. One costs £100m ...
- 01 Dec 2023, 07:20
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 17954
- Views: 3667305
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
LRG/N will probably always be with JEF, because, well, what else is there.
Just like LSG/S will be EoS
Just like LSG/S will be EoS
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:31
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15070
- Views: 4272894
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
1) Neither QNLZ or PWLS would be sailing at 15 knots, most likely their maximum sustained speed. 2) A 72 hour readiness period for PWLS would not be required, because it would be included within the transit time (unless the requirements, as at 3) were to be supplied via a USN naval base. 3) The maj...
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:25
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 17954
- Views: 3667305
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
1) Humanitarian aid importance will be dictated by future government and its priorities. 2) Wouldn't say that MMD is a 'outrageous luxury', just some features of it. Though I do amit that a bit of it's value came from also being a GP frigate at the time of it's inception, you would be surprised how...
- 30 Nov 2023, 16:11
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15070
- Views: 4272894
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
1) HMS PoW is much closer.
2) It is about a 10 or 11 day sail at 15 knots, add 3 days on because the rediness requirement is for 72 hours, then it could be a two week voyage there.
3) We won't do anything.
2) It is about a 10 or 11 day sail at 15 knots, add 3 days on because the rediness requirement is for 72 hours, then it could be a two week voyage there.
3) We won't do anything.
- 30 Nov 2023, 15:47
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing P-8A Poseidon (MRA Mk.1) (RAF)
- Replies: 1265
- Views: 432120
Re: Boeing P-8A Poseidon (MRA Mk.1) (RAF)
mk54 was always planned as the intermediary.
- 29 Nov 2023, 21:54
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)
- Replies: 377
- Views: 22147
Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)
This has and always was separate to NMH, these FOST helicopters are owned by a contractor, like the aggressor aircraft we also have on contract. Completely unrelated to NMH. Yes, but with the MoD stating what aircraft they would prefer, there has to be a link in their thinking. At least, I hope som...
- 29 Nov 2023, 20:50
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)
- Replies: 377
- Views: 22147
Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)
Interesting post from Gabriel, is this a sign that the AW149 has won NMH (as we all expected it probably would) or if something else wins, is it a sign that the MoD is going to add yet another type to the inventory instead of using some joined-up thinking (and we all probably expect this too :lol: ...
- 29 Nov 2023, 01:00
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 5950
- Views: 1642678
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
I think it's time to start looking at the delivery times of F-35 vs tempest. Tempest with deliveries starting 2035, how quickly will our F-35B Batch 2 order arrive? Is the +27 jets worth it? Used as delay overlap? Batch 3? Larger Batch 2? All important questions. I don't put this against tempest, ju...
- 28 Nov 2023, 23:04
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: Australian Defence Force
- Replies: 2591
- Views: 92150
- 28 Nov 2023, 06:58
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 17954
- Views: 3667305
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- 25 Nov 2023, 22:13
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 17954
- Views: 3667305
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Hey, that sounds an awful lot like the BAE leander...
which costs the same as a AH140...
which costs the same as a AH140...
- 25 Nov 2023, 16:22
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 17954
- Views: 3667305
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
used for mainland french patrol and nuclear deterrence missions.
- 24 Nov 2023, 16:14
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 17954
- Views: 3667305
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Further to recent OPV discussions. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/11/frances-dga-orders-7-new-opv-for-the-french-navy/ 7 new French 2400t OPVs for €900m or £112m unit. A stretched River to 115m LOA and around 2500t at £125m unit certainly looks plausible in comparison. Did a large post a...
- 24 Nov 2023, 00:10
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: French Armed Forces
- Replies: 1856
- Views: 73923
Re: French Armed Forces
The French navy has ordered 7 new larger OPV's. A bit over £100m each. Initial 7, +3 in the future around ~2030 The Patrouilleurs Hauturiers OPVs will have a displacement of about 2,400 tons. The vessels can accommodate up to 84 personnel (crew + passengers) and have a range of 6,000 nautical miles....
- 23 Nov 2023, 22:22
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 5459
- Views: 1013502
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Some of you are going to love this: https://twitter.com/MarinhaPT/status/1727736515613073750 My opinion? - Nice - Earlier renders where much more ugly - No, Not suitible for MQ-9B STOL ops. That is for the 250m long ship range (If you want a load with any endurance). - The UAV's it will handle will ...
- 23 Nov 2023, 17:37
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 5459
- Views: 1013502
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
The funny thing about some of these rubbish takes on here about MRSS is that the KUR will be released early next year, Meaning soon we will se the RN reveal what, even against some opinions here, will be the think that happens and thus the ultimate truth.
KUR=Key User Requirement.
KUR=Key User Requirement.
- 23 Nov 2023, 17:16
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: Swedish Armed Forces
- Replies: 215
- Views: 11553
Re: Swedish Armed Forces
Gobaleye for NATO still isn't strictly out of the question.
- 23 Nov 2023, 17:13
- Forum: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry
- Topic: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry - News & Discussion
- Replies: 75
- Views: 5909
Re: United Kingdom’s defence exports saw a significant surge in 2022
an entire thread?
- 22 Nov 2023, 20:38
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15070
- Views: 4272894
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Royal Navy has interest in ghost bat, and the RAF too.
- 21 Nov 2023, 20:54
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15070
- Views: 4272894
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
AW609??? seriously?
- 21 Nov 2023, 17:15
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8261
- Views: 2027178
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
integration of Mk 41 VLS...
- 21 Nov 2023, 17:13
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: USA Armed Forces
- Replies: 2057
- Views: 85789
Re: USA Armed Forces
To hunt a submarine one must first become a submarine...
- 19 Nov 2023, 17:06
- Forum: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry
- Topic: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry - News & Discussion
- Replies: 75
- Views: 5909
Re: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry - News & Discussion
We need a britten norman version of this, for the Navy and army.
- 19 Nov 2023, 16:35
- Forum: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry
- Topic: MBDA (UK)
- Replies: 307
- Views: 21767
Re: MBDA (UK)
+ whether they will be constructed at roysth. Also how close they will be to Visby 2.0, Pohjanmaa-class, e.c.t. or any of the ~100m ship designs in that range that both saab and babcock have had in recent years. The Luleå class will 100% not be constructed at Rosyth. The hull will probably be built...