Search found 692 matches

by mrclark303
30 Nov 2023, 18:21
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing P-8A Poseidon (MRA Mk.1) (RAF)
Replies: 1265
Views: 432116
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing P-8A Poseidon (MRA Mk.1) (RAF)

Not seen this before - Stingray for Poseidon https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/raf-chooses-uk-manufactured-sting-ray-torpedo-for-poseidon-fleet/ The interesting thing will be if a wing kit is developed for it.... Sounds like a good idea, we really do need another 3 Poseidon to make a viable flee...
by mrclark303
29 Nov 2023, 19:53
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)
Replies: 377
Views: 22145
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Interesting post from Gabriel, is this a sign that the AW149 has won NMH (as we all expected it probably would) or if something else wins, is it a sign that the MoD is going to add yet another type to the inventory instead of using some joined-up thinking (and we all probably expect this too :lol: ...
by mrclark303
29 Nov 2023, 09:10
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Replies: 5950
Views: 1642675
United Kingdom

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

I think it's time to start looking at the delivery times of F-35 vs tempest. Tempest with deliveries starting 2035, how quickly will our F-35B Batch 2 order arrive? Is the +27 jets worth it? Used as delay overlap? Batch 3? Larger Batch 2? All important questions. I don't put this against tempest, j...
by mrclark303
28 Nov 2023, 00:04
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Replies: 17954
Views: 3667294
United Kingdom

Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion

The Royal Navy does not need 24 escorts to generate a carrier group and an amphibious group. Nor does the Royal Navy currently require a carrier group and an amphibious group. I assume you’re using the 3 to 1 ratio to get to these numbers but that is the historical number for sustained long range t...
by mrclark303
24 Nov 2023, 18:52
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Albion Class Amphibious Assault Ships (LPD) (RN)
Replies: 568
Views: 191823
United Kingdom

Re: Albion Class Amphibious Assault Ships (LPD) (RN)

As said Bulwark will come back on line and work up and then QE will go in for first major dry dock refit and POW will take over the strike carrier role I think there is a big question mark over the future of Bulwark and Albion. Both I think are potentially tempting low hanging fruit for the next Go...
by mrclark303
24 Nov 2023, 14:21
Forum: Defence Elsewhere
Topic: Australian Defence Force
Replies: 2591
Views: 92150
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]

shark bait wrote: 24 Nov 2023, 13:21 I didn't know BAE has increased the beam for the Australians. Turns out is not jut the UK MOD that buys standard stuff and the buggers with it!
Seems like a bad idea, keep the propulsion and hull form the same, start buggering with altering the dimensions and it starts to unravel....
by mrclark303
23 Nov 2023, 19:27
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
Replies: 574
Views: 152904
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

a NATO awac that is due to enter service in 2031 financed mainly by the US will come of a uk modification line, someone’s been on the sherry early. "someone’s been on the sherry early" How do you know I drink the cooking sherry while working in my Kitchen, is that you in the ice-cream van...
by mrclark303
23 Nov 2023, 17:39
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
Replies: 574
Views: 152904
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

The first RAF Wedgetail could be flying next year .... https://twitter.com/Gabriel64869839/status/1724744015122219443?s=20 Common sense would absolutely dictate that the orders are simply added to the already up and running UK assembly line. A production facility with trained personnel with a wealt...
by mrclark303
22 Nov 2023, 21:06
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Replies: 15070
Views: 4272887
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Aw609 fuselage is not sized to be of any use as a military platform. You might as well start from scratch. Depends on the role and requirement. I'm not suggesting it's a Merlin HC4 replacement. This is a platform that's been developed almost fully, for the civil role. Why reinvent the wheel if ther...
by mrclark303
22 Nov 2023, 16:46
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Replies: 15070
Views: 4272887
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

It doesn't actually exist in the real world, so it's at least 15 years away from potential UK purchase, 20 would be more likely. Not far off the timeframe of the Bell HSTOVL family, should the DARPA chose to go beyond their Speed and Runway Independent Technologies (SpRInT) programme. The smallest ...
by mrclark303
22 Nov 2023, 16:26
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1037
Views: 301272
United Kingdom

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

I believe Boxer already has a version with a 30mm stabilised turret in production?? Well Lithuanian Boxers are equipped with Rafael's remote Samson Mk II turret, Germany is planing to use same remote turret as one mounted on Puma IFV, Australians are using manned Lance turret on their CRV version. ...
by mrclark303
21 Nov 2023, 14:33
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1037
Views: 301272
United Kingdom

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

What about this: https://aei-systems.com/venom_lr_30mm_gun/ The Venom is probably better suited to light vehicles, as a drop-in replacment for 12.7mm, where more firepower is needed For heavier vehicles, I think full-fat 30 x 173 would be more desirable (and could also be mounted in a RWS) My perso...
by mrclark303
19 Nov 2023, 17:43
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Replies: 15070
Views: 4272887
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

This is why Iv often mentioned on here about the V-247 being perfect for us just look at the current options it gives let alone what will progress. V-247 does look as a nice solution for QE class, it shout also be able to operate from probably any other ship with big enough helipad in the RN and co...
by mrclark303
19 Nov 2023, 17:39
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Replies: 15070
Views: 4272887
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

SKB wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 16:30 Please stop requoting requotes. You typed three lines, yet your post produced a further 22 lines that take up website memory and page space.
You won't catch me re-quoting posts, outrageous behaviour.....
by mrclark303
19 Nov 2023, 14:48
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Replies: 15070
Views: 4272887
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

This is why Iv often mentioned on here about the V-247 being perfect for us just look at the current options it gives let alone what will progress. V-247 does look as a nice solution for QE class, it shout also be able to operate from probably any other ship with big enough helipad in the RN and co...
by mrclark303
19 Nov 2023, 14:29
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Replies: 15070
Views: 4272887
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

bobp wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 03:50 A few titbits from the Daily Mail online.....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... preys.html
Unfortunately Bob, you lost me at Daily Mail...

For that matter Daily anything, newspapers are only good for weekend rattle can car paintwork....
by mrclark303
18 Nov 2023, 18:44
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Replies: 15070
Views: 4272887
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Probably an unpopular opinion; cats and traps is an unhelpful distraction from developing the carriers I do agree, I would love to have two cats and traps carriers but we have been through the mill with these carriers, with defects, possibility of only getting one and other scares, now that we have...
by mrclark303
18 Nov 2023, 00:19
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
Replies: 574
Views: 152904
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

That makes no sense. If you don't know, just say so. Oh lighten up..... The point being, the RAF has many thousands of personnel, of course they could fly and mainly 5 aircraft, they obviously wouldn't because probably only 3 would be operational at any one time, with a back up and one in the maint...
by mrclark303
17 Nov 2023, 22:02
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
Replies: 574
Views: 152904
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

I'm not sure what the serviceability of them are yet, however if we want 5 then we need enough people to support 5. There's more to it than just flight crew numbers, without everyone else they're just paper weights. That really shouldn't be a problem, these are lots of overweight, shiney arse pen p...
by mrclark303
17 Nov 2023, 21:56
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
Replies: 574
Views: 152904
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

Equipment is pointless if you can afford to support or sustain it, it just becomes and expensive boondoggle. So, during the last Cold War 1945- 1990, UK was able to have defence spending on average 5-6 percent of the GDP- and surprise, surprise- it didn't bankrupt itself. And today, in the middle o...
by mrclark303
17 Nov 2023, 14:13
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 307
Views: 35926
United Kingdom

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Neich capabilities are always tempting low hanging fruit for government defence cuts... I guess you mean niche capabilities? They may be niche in terms of current capabilities, but invaluable I'd argue to maintain memory and experience of how to use that particular type of capability, ie to retain ...
by mrclark303
17 Nov 2023, 14:08
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 307
Views: 35926
United Kingdom

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Neich capabilities are always tempting low hanging fruit for government defence cuts... I guess you mean niche capabilities? They may be niche in terms of current capabilities, but invaluable I'd argue to maintain memory and experience of how to use that particular type of capability, ie to retain ...
by mrclark303
17 Nov 2023, 09:50
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 307
Views: 35926
United Kingdom

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Somebody has open up a good argument for a debate on the totality of the entire program ???? Everyone opinions are welcomed !!!! https://x.com/nicholadrummond/status/1725209961297310002?s=20 I guess KNDS know what is the best for the British Army and UK. And they are only saying that from the goodn...
by mrclark303
17 Nov 2023, 01:43
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
Replies: 574
Views: 152904
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

I wasn't blaming the Americans, just that keeping up with them isn't cheap. Understood, but first tier equipment is absolutely what the RAF should have.... A core aircraft fleet of Poseidon, E7 and Rivet Joint is expensive, but they are at the core of the RAF and each fleet should be available in t...
by mrclark303
16 Nov 2023, 18:58
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)
Replies: 574
Views: 152904
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing E-7 Wedgetail (RAF)

SW1 wrote: 16 Nov 2023, 18:45 Equipment is pointless if you can afford to support or sustain it, it just becomes and expensive boondoggle.
We can support and sustain it, we simply chose not to in the past 2005-2015, during the endless Afghan intervention and the course was set in stone with the damage done.