Search found 7329 matches
- 27 Apr 2024, 14:49
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8509
- Views: 2207546
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
I also wonder how well a Type 31 would have done in shooting down an incoming ballistic missile (see latest RN news). I also wonder how it has now become acceptable to fire ballistic missiles at commercial vessels and the only thing that is discussed is the success of shooting it down. It’s difficu...
- 27 Apr 2024, 14:42
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5717
- Views: 1502675
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
https://thinpinstripedline.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-saga-of-norway-and-type-26.html Humphry is being positive on the potential Norway deal, bullish even On the Babcock subject, I don't think there'd be a technical obstacle to Babcock building half a T26, but I assume BAE would want to do all the in...
- 27 Apr 2024, 14:40
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5717
- Views: 1502675
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
On the Babcock subject, I don't think there'd be a technical obstacle to Babcock building half a T26, but I assume BAE would want to do all the integration, to protect their IP. So that bare hull would be pretty bare. This I think is an issue easily solved if the government establishes a single UK ...
- 27 Apr 2024, 14:38
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5717
- Views: 1502675
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
BAE are only building the new construction hall because the government have allowed it in the contract for the new batch. If the government want T26 them every 48 months and the blockage is say the need for another panel line at Govan, it will be the government deciding on whether that investment i...
- 27 Apr 2024, 14:32
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2842
- Views: 789081
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
To defend Gibraltar?mrclark303 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2024, 12:42 While we are at it, we should make serious overtures to Spain and try and pick up the 17 Trance 2 jets they have surplus.
- 27 Apr 2024, 14:27
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
- Replies: 2826
- Views: 751987
Re: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
I assume that these highly automated guns will need ammunition loading carriers as well. Patent pictures: https://below-the-turret-ring.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Boxer-Munitionspanzer-Missionsmodul.png https://below-the-turret-ring.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Boxer-Munitionspanzer.png https...
- 26 Apr 2024, 15:09
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5717
- Views: 1502675
- 26 Apr 2024, 15:03
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
- Replies: 2826
- Views: 751987
Re: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
this bit surprised me... The RCH 155 will be produced and supported in the United Kingdom with Rheinmetall establishing UK barrel manufacturing. Very surprising. I doubt if it is correct or will remain so. Nicholas Drummond appears to have removed his claim that the barrels will be made in the UK.
- 26 Apr 2024, 14:56
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8509
- Views: 2207546
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
I also wonder how well a Type 31 would have done in shooting down an incoming ballistic missile (see latest RN news).
- 26 Apr 2024, 14:48
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5717
- Views: 1502675
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
But if the government hasn't got £500m that is the problem. Doesn't matter. At some point, the cost per year saturates. And, that is HMG's business, not related to BAESs. BAES can start hull-1 slowly (to compensate slow pay), but make it needing only 48 months in later hulls. This is exactly why BA...
- 26 Apr 2024, 14:25
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8509
- Views: 2207546
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
I wonder how it changes direction. I see no evidence of little wings or other aerodynamic means.
- 26 Apr 2024, 14:12
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 894
- Views: 328524
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
I find odd we are putting our gun platform on wheels and our missile platform on tracks. You would think it should be either the other way round or all on wheels MLRS was acquired by the UK over 30 years ago. Are you suggesting that because the new SPG is on wheels, the UK should dispose of its MLR...
- 25 Apr 2024, 14:21
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5717
- Views: 1502675
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Geo Osborne. The gift that keeps giving.donald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑25 Apr 2024, 13:58 Why building slowly, say 60 months, is I do not know. Why?
- 25 Apr 2024, 14:17
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5717
- Views: 1502675
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
….it would impact deliveries for RN, and might cause some capability gap…. If two NATO members are combining to replace their ASW Frigates with a bleeding edge top level capability if any temporary gap occurs is it not NATO’s responsibility to fill it? WTF do you think the US has been doing since W...
- 25 Apr 2024, 14:14
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9760512
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The future is non specialised frigates and a large increase in what we would call the middle to conduct the every day operations of a navy. Fortunately no Navy in the world shares your opinion. High end warships are continued to be designed and manufactured despite what their local air forces think...
- 25 Apr 2024, 14:09
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
- Replies: 2826
- Views: 751987
- 25 Apr 2024, 13:55
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 894
- Views: 328524
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
I find odd we are putting our gun platform on wheels and our missile platform on tracks. You would think it should be either the other way round or all on wheels MLRS was acquired by the UK over 30 years ago. Are you suggesting that because the new SPG is on wheels, the UK should dispose of its MLR...
- 25 Apr 2024, 13:46
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 894
- Views: 328524
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Would I be incorrect in presuming the RCH turrets can be moved between boxer platforms? Apparently the Boxer platform for the RCH155 is a little bit different than the regular one used by APC, Ambulances etc. And I don't know if the turret is easily moved anyway. It's a different beastie than the t...
- 23 Apr 2024, 13:46
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6182
- Views: 1878992
- 23 Apr 2024, 13:44
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
- Replies: 856
- Views: 311896
Re: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
Is this a phony celebration for PR purposes?
- 21 Apr 2024, 13:55
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9760512
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Also, you are completely ignoring the threat today, let alone the future. Even with some of the unfunded bells and whistles people want to add to the GP T31 it will not be enough. These ships have been designed to run away gracefully, nothing more. I believe the correct term is "bravely run aw...
- 20 Apr 2024, 14:26
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9760512
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Also, you are completely ignoring the threat today, let alone the future. Even with some of the unfunded bells and whistles people want to add to the GP T31 it will not be enough. These ships have been designed to run away gracefully, nothing more. I believe the correct term is "bravely run aw...
- 20 Apr 2024, 14:19
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: Directed Energy Weapons
- Replies: 57
- Views: 6870
Re: Directed Energy Weapons
Despite your panicked introduction of a bunch of red herrings, the basic point was that the WR-21 was not adequately tested because of Hoon's decision to close Pyestock. That lack of testing lead directly to the failures of the ships when in service. I know you will respond with more nonsense as you...
- 19 Apr 2024, 14:30
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6102
- Views: 1779285
- 19 Apr 2024, 14:28
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6102
- Views: 1779285
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
So by late September this year we could be in the rather odd position of having 1160 odd F-35 built in total....but c170 being parked up and undelivered. 15% of the total built...And all 990 delivered to date are in need of that same TR-3 upgrade so that they can start down the upgrade path to Bloc...