Search found 918 matches
- 27 Sep 2023, 09:51
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
Real SUIT or repro?
- 26 Sep 2023, 23:54
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
If 6.5 is not better than 7.62 and neither is 6.8, then we can all rest easy knowing that we don't have to change anything. We can just break out the SLR's and crack on 

- 26 Sep 2023, 12:02
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
The US trials the 6.5CM vs 7.62 showed it doubling the hit probability at 1000 metres, 33% increase in effective range, 30% increase in energy on target, 40% decrease in wind effect on bullet and decreased recoil, you might not call that a real advantage but i would call that a major advance over t...
- 24 Sep 2023, 12:40
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
The issue is that Creedmoor was trialled and found not to offer a real advantage over 7.62 x 51mm, as in it can be defeated by modern body armour. USSOCOM have adopted it for their Precision Rifle, RM's have adopted it for the L129, I would think that their decisions took into account modern body a...
- 22 Sep 2023, 21:34
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
Yes I was, sorry I should have been more clear... In a previous post you said 2030, that's a little over 6 years away. You implied that we should just go with the 6.8, an unproven, experimental round.
Could you expand on your second point, as I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
Could you expand on your second point, as I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
- 22 Sep 2023, 19:00
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
lol... You want to change to 6.8 but not 6.5???
- 22 Sep 2023, 11:20
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
The Royal Marines have adopted not only another new rifle, but a new calibre as well, 6.5 Creedmoor. https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2023/09/21/u-k-royal-marines-adopt-6-5cm-lmt-l129a2-ft-huxwrx-leupold/ Absolutely bonkers decision unless they're adopting it for a LMG too. I hope so... :P
- 19 Sep 2023, 20:19
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Civil Aviation
- Replies: 152
- Views: 7673
- 18 Sep 2023, 17:43
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 5930
- Views: 1635715
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
What is it with Marines losing stuff at the moment?SW1 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2023, 12:39 For anyone in South Carolina the marines are looking for an f35 one careful owner a few dents
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66841194

- 13 Sep 2023, 10:30
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
Curious, how do you think its to big to fail? Lockheed were smart with F-35, they had part's built in so many states that no senator would be brave enough to kill it. An experimental bullet doesn't have that.
- 13 Sep 2023, 00:55
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
Or not, because its probably sidelinedmrclark303 wrote: ↑12 Sep 2023, 16:29 Let Uncle Sam spent the development money and do maturity tweaking over the next 5/10 years, other firearms manufacturers will also develop new rifles for the calibre and we can pick and choose 'way down' the road.....

- 10 Sep 2023, 20:45
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
- Replies: 380
- Views: 72875
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
As I said before make the NMH program 66 airframes split 20 to the RAF and 30 to the Army with 12 in a joint OCU and 4 held for deep maintenance next move 26 Wildcats to the Navy with 18 feed into service and 8 held for deep maintenance / upgrade with the remaining 8 sold all 3 services get what th...
- 08 Sep 2023, 22:42
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Jackal and Coyote MWMIK (Army)
- Replies: 161
- Views: 53104
Re: Jackal and Coyote MWMIK (Army)
Was thinking (dangerous I know)... Does anybody remember the AWD MTL 33 Multidrive artic from the late 80's / early 90's? It was a four wheeler tractor unit with a 4 wheel trailer, the trailer wheels where drive by a prop shaft from the tractor unit, making it all wheel drive. If Supacat does an ele...
- 08 Sep 2023, 22:26
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
I'm assuming they are referring to the fancy optic setup... The rifle is obviously no more 'lethal' than the current L85A3, but it's lighter, simpler and obviously has all the benefits of the AR platform, all wrapped up in the ultimate gas impingement variation. The Optic and the suppressor Knights...
- 07 Sep 2023, 16:44
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
- Replies: 380
- Views: 72875
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
except Merlins and Chinooks aren't Army... 

- 07 Sep 2023, 11:16
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1442
- Views: 404389
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
More lethal???
- 31 Aug 2023, 20:28
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: DSEI
- Replies: 19
- Views: 565
Re: DSEI
Looks like Johnny Number 5 to me 

- 30 Aug 2023, 08:07
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 5930
- Views: 1635715
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
X-32 was a Harrier style concept, using 2 mid mounted nozzles (the standard rear exhaust closed for STOVL flight).
- 27 Aug 2023, 10:37
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: AW159 Wildcat Helicopter (RN & AAC)
- Replies: 481
- Views: 196179
Re: AW159 Wildcat Helicopter (RN & AAC)
Not sure where 24 came from, but this is from the Leonardo thread... If these are successfully concluded, the volumes under discussion would lead to a “double-digit backlog” for the Wildcat, said Clarke, speaking at an event in Yeovil on 22 August A Wildcat sized Naval asset was never going to set t...
- 26 Aug 2023, 10:40
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 14879
- Views: 4243177
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
I wonder if any of the top brass would have the balls to stand up and say that the plane was lost, (basically) because of the repercussions of the forced "gap"?
Nah, silly me... They'll just wait for retirement first.
Nah, silly me... They'll just wait for retirement first.
- 21 Aug 2023, 22:56
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
- Replies: 2763
- Views: 661089
Re: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
If they can do a full evaluation, could be interesting...
- 20 Aug 2023, 18:33
- Forum: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry
- Topic: Hill Helicopters
- Replies: 8
- Views: 226
Re: Hill Helicopters
They have a lot of interesting videos (including VLOG's), only watched a few so far, but I'm working my way through them
https://www.youtube.com/@HillHelicopters/videos

https://www.youtube.com/@HillHelicopters/videos
- 19 Aug 2023, 15:12
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 14879
- Views: 4243177
- 15 Aug 2023, 12:54
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2628
- Views: 730942
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
It's India, if you haven't been accused of corruption, then you're doing something wrong.
Give it a couple of years and Safran's name will be dirt too.
Give it a couple of years and Safran's name will be dirt too.
- 14 Aug 2023, 12:26
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The future form of the Army
- Replies: 624
- Views: 42421
Re: The future form of the Army
Saw this last night, don't think it's been posted before...