Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »



I imagine she’ll be more than just a pretty sight if she is called upon for disaster relief

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »


^ First time (I think) the lifts have been shown operating in a video ?

SDL
Member
Posts: 763
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SDL »


User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

^ Landing spot 2 seems to be darker than usual. New surface? And note the Merlin stains at spots 4, 5 and 6 on the stern.
Image

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »

Get the washing in, it looks like it’s going to rain..


SDL
Member
Posts: 763
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SDL »


CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »

No wonder there’s no one on deck!

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7323
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

CameronPerson wrote:No wonder there’s no one on deck!
40 knot winds and heavy clouds, isn't that kinda usual in the UK?

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Image
(@HMSQnlz) 17 September 2018
When a Queen met a President. USS Abraham Lincoln a few berths along in #Norfolk #Virginia #USA
*insert obligatory "no planes" comment here for both carriers*

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7323
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

Both dead and buried.

PS wouldn't that Merlin be more comfortable below?

WhiteWhale
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: 19 Oct 2015, 18:29
Somalia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by WhiteWhale »

I have also been wondering why it hasn't been stowed, best guess is that its being kept ready for emergancy / S+R reasons?

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »



Image
Image
Image
Image

SDL
Member
Posts: 763
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SDL »


User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »


"The" :roll:
Image

Digger22
Member
Posts: 349
Joined: 27 May 2015, 16:47
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Digger22 »

Comparison shot to follow soon hopefully. From what I can see the main difference in size between the two is in the length of the bow forward of the sponsons, making QE look a little snub nosed (beg your pardon Ma'am).

seaspear
Senior Member
Posts: 1779
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:16
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by seaspear »

just as well you didn't mention the beam then

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1314
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

I always thought. She was stumpy nose looking but as many havesaid prob becouse the second island. And ski ramp , beamlooks similar to american carrier. But lenght she is and dose look alot smaller in my eyes

Jake1992
Senior Member
Posts: 2006
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 22:35
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jake1992 »

inch wrote:I always thought. She was stumpy nose looking but as many havesaid prob becouse the second island. And ski ramp , beamlooks similar to american carrier. But lenght she is and dose look alot smaller in my eyes
If I remember right the sizes are around this:

Nimitz - length 334m. Beam 75-78m

QE - length 280-284m. Beam - 70-73m

The slight variation in the sizes are due to where you get the info from

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1314
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

Atleast still a bit bigger than the invisibles , if we had wanted size of american or future chinese or russian future carrier if they ever get around to financing it at 110,000 ton. I think i read im sure we could have built one or2 but as we prob dont need that size i quess she will do

Jake1992
Senior Member
Posts: 2006
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 22:35
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jake1992 »

inch wrote:Atleast still a bit bigger than the invisibles , if we had wanted size of american or future chinese or russian future carrier if they ever get around to financing it at 110,000 ton. I think i read im sure we could have built one or2 but as we prob dont need that size i quess she will do
Well at -
70,200tn ( maybe push to 72,000tn )
284m long
73m
Beam
Up to 70 odd aircraft
250 - 900 RM
All for just £3.2bn each they pack quiet a punch compared to most ( 2/3 the capability for 1/3 the cost of the US carriers )
Iv read that China plans on 2 x 85,000tn carrier and then 2 x 100,000+ carriers for a fleet of 6 over all. How true this is and weather it'll happen who knows ( I wouldng bet against it )

I really can't see the Russian storm carrier design coming to ote, they havnt got the funding for it with more pressing needs they also havnt got a facility large enough to build it, so would have to build all that infrastructure on top of the carrier its self

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Timmymagic »

inch wrote:russian future carrier
Future Russian carriers will be confined purely to models and computer graphics. As every year passes their ability to build large ships slips further and further away.

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5632
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Tempest414 »

Maybe if Russia wants a new carrier or 2 they should ask India to build them 40 to 45,000 ton able to operate 40 or so aircraft

Jake1992
Senior Member
Posts: 2006
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 22:35
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jake1992 »

Tempest414 wrote:Maybe if Russia wants a new carrier or 2 they should ask India to build them 40 to 45,000 ton able to operate 40 or so aircraft
That's one option or they could ask China, but I just can't see them doing it for national pride sake.

I can only see 4 nations tops have "super" carriers in the future, UK, USA, China and maybe India

Clive F
Member
Posts: 176
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 12:48
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Clive F »

France maybe??

Jake1992
Senior Member
Posts: 2006
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 22:35
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jake1992 »

Clive F wrote:France maybe??
At a push maybe but I could see it as more likely that they'll go for another 45,000tn odd carrier for financial reasons

Post Reply