River Class (OPV) (RN)

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5603
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Active, every where.

These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post (total 3):
Ron5CaribbeanJackstar

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5603
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

HMS Tamar, now in NZ.

- RNZN frigate has just test-fired 2 CAMMs. The frigates also as SeaSentor torpedo defense kits. So, yes NZ has a good commonality with RN.
- I really hope HMS Tamar crew take a visit of HMNZS Otago and Wellington, the two OPV now in extended readiness because of lack of crew. As one River B2 is in long refit these days, leasing an OPV from RNZN will be able to fill the gap (with a Wildcat capable hangar, a 15t crane, and three 20ft-container carriage space, they will be very good for Caribbean operation). It will also further tighten the relation between the two navies, and improve the possibility that NZ buy T31 variant as their frigate replacement.

These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post (total 3):
serge750Jackstarwargame_insomniac

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5603
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

HMS Tamar just left Auckland NZ. Comparison with RNZN OPV is interesting. Although HMS Tamar is not a ship to fight, it look more fighty than RNZN OPVs, which looks more bulky.



PS.1 RN OPV being a frequent visitor to NZ is very good. Also, HMS Tamar steaming at sea looks very beautiful. I love her.


PS.2 The reason why I think these NZ OPV can be a good substitute for Caribbean sea. Can operate SH-2G on their deck (actually, said to be very tight), and has a hangar 16m+ long (from the blue print), which can accommodate Wildcat (note Wildcat's rotor diameter is 0.6m smaller than that of SH-2Gs).


Image
Image
These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post (total 5):
CaribbeanIan HallRepulseJackstarwargame_insomniac

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5632
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Tempest414 »

I like the Protector class layout and this is what I would be looking for a 100 by 16 meter ship with the same layout allowing for a bigger flight deck and rear working deck could be a very nice MHPC

User avatar
Ian Hall
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 18 Jun 2023, 14:55
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ian Hall »

These users liked the author Ian Hall for the post (total 4):
donald_of_tokyoRon5Repulsewargame_insomniac

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4111
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Dazzling!

These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post (total 5):
JackstarRepulsebobpdonald_of_tokyoRon5

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1564
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by tomuk »

Where are the Rivers when you've got an EEZ to protect?

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4111
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Some nice shots here.
These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post (total 3):
donald_of_tokyoRon5Ian Hall

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4738
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 2):
donald_of_tokyowargame_insomniac
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

User avatar
Ian Hall
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 18 Jun 2023, 14:55
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ian Hall »

These users liked the author Ian Hall for the post:
donald_of_tokyo

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4738
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Close to Haiti if an evacuation of the embassy is required?

These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 3):
Ron5wargame_insomniacdonald_of_tokyo
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4738
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 2):
Ron5wargame_insomniac
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4738
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 2):
donald_of_tokyoRon5
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4738
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Some +ve PR for the RN in a flood of woe

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68748861
These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 3):
Ian Hallwargame_insomniacAnthony58
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

User avatar
Ian Hall
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 18 Jun 2023, 14:55
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ian Hall »

Repulse wrote: 05 Apr 2024, 08:38
Nice video. I can understand those who post on improving the lethality and sensors of the B2, but thankfully the debate about turning them into some sort of 21st century Panzerschiff has died down of late.

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7329
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ron5 »

Ian Hall wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 13:00 but thankfully the debate about turning them into some sort of 21st century Panzerschiff has died down of late.
Hey, nothing wrong with Panzerschiff's!!

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4738
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Ian Hall wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 13:00
Repulse wrote: 05 Apr 2024, 08:38
Nice video. I can understand those who post on improving the lethality and sensors of the B2, but thankfully the debate about turning them into some sort of 21st century Panzerschiff has died down of late.
I agree, and I believe by these deployments people have started to understand the subtle but great value these platforms bring in their current roles. Given the pressures and priorities in the broader RN, I just hope sense prevails and they (or similar ships) are allowed to continue.
These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 4):
Ian Hallnew guyAnthony58Nimonic
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Online
RunningStrong
Senior Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by RunningStrong »

Ian Hall wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 13:00
Repulse wrote: 05 Apr 2024, 08:38
Nice video. I can understand those who post on improving the lethality and sensors of the B2, but thankfully the debate about turning them into some sort of 21st century Panzerschiff has died down of late.
I'm not sure how we can continue to deploy them for anything except fishery patrol if they haven't got some UAS defence. Even the Drug Cartels are capable of flying a UAS with a shaped charge on it. It would be an embarrassment.

User avatar
Ian Hall
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 18 Jun 2023, 14:55
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ian Hall »

RunningStrong wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 18:07
Ian Hall wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 13:00
Repulse wrote: 05 Apr 2024, 08:38
Nice video. I can understand those who post on improving the lethality and sensors of the B2, but thankfully the debate about turning them into some sort of 21st century Panzerschiff has died down of late.
I'm not sure how we can continue to deploy them for anything except fishery patrol if they haven't got some UAS defence. Even the Drug Cartels are capable of flying a UAS with a shaped charge on it. It would be an embarrassment.
30mm ASCG ?

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4738
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

A 40mm or 57mm would definitely be my preference, but AFAIK it has a decent radar for its class and maybe a counter UAV with LMM or even a shoulder fired Starstreak would do the job.
These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 2):
new guywargame_insomniac
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4111
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

My opinion hasn’t changed on this.

Retire the 3x RB2’s back to the U.K. EEZ in 2028 and retain the other 2 in the Falklands and Gibraltar.

They are a compromised platform for global patrol and always will be unfortunately.
These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post:
tomuk

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4738
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Poiuytrewq wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 18:55 My opinion hasn’t changed on this.

Retire the 3x RB2’s back to the U.K. EEZ in 2028 and retain the other 2 in the Falklands and Gibraltar.

They are a compromised platform for global patrol and always will be unfortunately.
It’s good that reality is proving the opposite.
These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 3):
new guyIan HallNimonic
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4111
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Repulse wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 19:40 It’s good that reality is proving the opposite.
I think the reality is that RN is making the best of a compromised asset that was unwanted at inception.

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1263
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by new guy »

Poiuytrewq wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 18:55
They are a compromised platform for global patrol and always will be unfortunately.
Compromised how?
These users liked the author new guy for the post:
Ian Hall

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4111
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

new guy wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 20:22
Poiuytrewq wrote: 06 Apr 2024, 18:55
They are a compromised platform for global patrol and always will be unfortunately.
Compromised how?
They are too much and not enough.

Post Reply