Future Solid Support Ship

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by new guy »

Poiuytrewq wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 12:33
donald_of_tokyo wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 12:31 Here I assume the 2nd hull’s crew comes from disbanding Argus.
If the RFA headcount issues can’t be resolved by 2032 they never will be.
The thing is that all of this is only for numbers of a hundred or so. The RFA would 'only' have to gain 1,000 extra people and this would be solved. In the scale of things, 1k is nothing. Even worse, If your in a situation for an organisation as big as the RN/MOD/UKPLC/the whole 68+million brits, and you struggle to find the than 100 people, then you know you have very big problems ahead.

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5603
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

new guy wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 17:09
Poiuytrewq wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 12:33
donald_of_tokyo wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 12:31 Here I assume the 2nd hull’s crew comes from disbanding Argus.
If the RFA headcount issues can’t be resolved by 2032 they never will be.
The thing is that all of this is only for numbers of a hundred or so. The RFA would 'only' have to gain 1,000 extra people and this would be solved. In the scale of things, 1k is nothing. Even worse, If your in a situation for an organisation as big as the RN/MOD/UKPLC/the whole 68+million brits, and you struggle to find the than 100 people, then you know you have very big problems ahead.
Just skilled naval people is more needed in business word, and MOD is not providing good enough pay.
These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post:
serge750

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by shark bait »

new guy wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 17:09 In the scale of things, 1k is nothing.
A thousand people will cost nearly £100 million a year.

That's a lot of money, and at the same time nothing compared to what the MOD pisses away.
donald_of_tokyo wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 23:14 MOD is not providing good enough pay.
Not by a long way! Especially in technical roles where an engineer will earn double in the private sector, plus more time at home, plus greater progression, plus no chance of going to war.

The Navy/MOD can't compete for talent.
These users liked the author shark bait for the post:
serge750
@LandSharkUK

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by new guy »

shark bait wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 23:40
new guy wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 17:09 In the scale of things, 1k is nothing.
A thousand people will cost nearly £100 million a year.

That's a lot of money, and at the same time nothing compared to what the MOD pisses away.
donald_of_tokyo wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 23:14 MOD is not providing good enough pay.
Not by a long way! Especially in technical roles where an engineer will earn double in the private sector, plus more time at home, plus greater progression, plus no chance of going to war.

The Navy/MOD can't compete for talent.
If it is nearly £100m a year, then the MoD spends 30bn a year on personnel, which I think is probably much less.

User avatar
Jensy
Moderator
Posts: 1089
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Jensy »

These users liked the author Jensy for the post:
donald_of_tokyo
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4108
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Poiuytrewq »

That’s the RFA recruitment and retention issue solved!

These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post (total 3):
serge750wargame_insomniacjedibeeftrix

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5629
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Tempest414 »

Nice video from Naval news with SSS


Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4108
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Tempest414 wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 09:31 Nice video from Naval news with SSS
The workshare for Cadiz looks very generous and as expected Appledore gets the Bow section. Good news!

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by shark bait »

Nice video, I like the details on what will be built where;

Image
@LandSharkUK

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by dmereifield »

I forget, has it been confirmed as 2 or 3 ships?

Online
Jdam
Member
Posts: 941
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Jdam »

So whats that about 60% built in Spain?

I cant remember what the original split was.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by SKB »

Should've been planned to be built entirely in the UK. The Spanish can't even build holiday villas or hotel rooms well... :mrgreen:

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5629
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Tempest414 »

shark bait wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 10:36 Nice video, I like the details on what will be built where;

Image
Great image but remember he said from ship two bottom of the middle section will be built by H&W as well

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5629
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Tempest414 »

She will also be a beast at 216 by 35 meters

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by shark bait »

I think it's good, and there will be slightly more for the Belfast on ship 2.

It's pretty much setting up a shipyard from scratch, so trusting them with even more would sound foolish.
These users liked the author shark bait for the post (total 2):
Tempest414new guy
@LandSharkUK

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4108
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Poiuytrewq »

shark bait wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 11:06 I think it's good, and there will be slightly more for the Belfast on ship 2.

It's pretty much setting up a shipyard from scratch, so trusting them with even more would sound foolish.
Agreed.

The priority is to have a fully functional shipyard at the completion of FSS. The skills transfer from Navantia will be extremely useful.

Also helps to keep a clear sense of perspective over Gibraltar.

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5603
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

FSSS. Crew size 101. This is the most significant point for me.

For Vic needs 134 souls, to my understanding.
These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post (total 2):
jedibeeftrixwargame_insomniac

jedibeeftrix
Member
Posts: 527
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:54

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by jedibeeftrix »

dmereifield wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 10:42 I forget, has it been confirmed as 2 or 3 ships?
i think the contract award earlier in the year said 3.

SD67
Senior Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: 23 Jul 2019, 09:49
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by SD67 »

It looks good. Once the assembly and integration are included it's probably 60% UK over the course of the contract, and frankly you wouldn't want to try for anything more, it would be asking for trouble.

If Team Resolute pull this off and at the end of the contract there's a fully functioning shipyard in Belfast capable of building ships that big - who knows, why not get back into cruise liners, they already service them. Start of a beautiful friendship
These users liked the author SD67 for the post (total 2):
jedibeeftrixwargame_insomniac

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4108
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by Poiuytrewq »

SD67 wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 13:44 It looks good. Once the assembly and integration are included it's probably 60% UK over the course of the contract, and frankly you wouldn't want to try for anything more, it would be asking for trouble.

If Team Resolute pull this off and at the end of the contract there's a fully functioning shipyard in Belfast capable of building ships that big - who knows, why not get back into cruise liners, they already service them. Start of a beautiful friendship
Completely agree.

The UK needs a big, well diversified commercial yard. Rosyth and Govan aren’t really suitable and it could have been Cammell Laird but Belfast got the nod.

H&W must make it work now. I don’t think they will get another chance like this.
These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post:
SD67

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by new guy »

SKB wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 10:50 Should've been planned to be built entirely in the UK. The Spanish can't even build holiday villas or hotel rooms well... :mrgreen:
Neither can a until-2years ago-dormant shipyard can it?

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by new guy »

dmereifield wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 10:42 I forget, has it been confirmed as 2 or 3 ships?
3

SD67
Senior Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: 23 Jul 2019, 09:49
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by SD67 »

new guy wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 16:59
SKB wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 10:50 Should've been planned to be built entirely in the UK. The Spanish can't even build holiday villas or hotel rooms well... :mrgreen:
Neither can a until-2years ago-dormant shipyard can it?
Personally I think we are really fortunate that a world class operator like Navntia is serious about partnering with UK shipbuilding. Obviously they're not doing it out of charity, but they seem to be making all the right noises. My only worry is how their people will handle the weather - suspect it may be more a case of H&W people sent to Cadiz LOL
These users liked the author SD67 for the post (total 2):
new guytomuk

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5603
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

SD67 wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 13:44 It looks good. Once the assembly and integration are included it's probably 60% UK over the course of the contract, and frankly you wouldn't want to try for anything more, it would be asking for trouble.

If Team Resolute pull this off and at the end of the contract there's a fully functioning shipyard in Belfast capable of building ships that big - who knows, why not get back into cruise liners, they already service them. Start of a beautiful friendship
Looks like all 3 hulls’ stern sections are to be built at Spain?

Then, Belfast gains zero experience on engine, intake-exhausts, shafts, ladders, bridges, all the heart of a “ship”.

Long road to go through, to get to be able get full ship order?

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

Post by new guy »

donald_of_tokyo wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 22:24
SD67 wrote: 13 Sep 2023, 13:44 It looks good. Once the assembly and integration are included it's probably 60% UK over the course of the contract, and frankly you wouldn't want to try for anything more, it would be asking for trouble.

If Team Resolute pull this off and at the end of the contract there's a fully functioning shipyard in Belfast capable of building ships that big - who knows, why not get back into cruise liners, they already service them. Start of a beautiful friendship
Looks like all 3 hulls’ stern sections are to be built at Spain?

Then, Belfast gains zero experience on engine, intake-exhausts, shafts, ladders, bridges, all the heart of a “ship”.

Long road to go through, to get to be able get full ship order?
fitting out?

Post Reply