None at present, but the rumours are that the FC-31 will find its first domestic customer n the PLAN. Whether there is any truth in that is hard to tell, it may just be based purely on the fact that it looks like the F-35 and that the PLAAF have shown zero interest in it, and thats the only shot they have at present as the J-20 is not carrier capable.seaspear wrote:Which P.L.A.N aircraft is considered carrier capable and fifth generation ?
Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3249
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Offtopic a bit, don't you think? And I disagree, it was WW1 not Seven-Years War...sunstersun wrote:
Also the seven years war basically KO'd France's chance of lingua franca. Secured English for all of history. That's crazy to think about.
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
-
- Member
- Posts: 363
- Joined: 09 Aug 2017, 04:00
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
nah, it was the Seven Years War. That war ensured that NA would speak English, which Bismarck said would be the most consequential geopolitical situation in the 20th century.abc123 wrote:Offtopic a bit, don't you think? And I disagree, it was WW1 not Seven-Years War...sunstersun wrote:
Also the seven years war basically KO'd France's chance of lingua franca. Secured English for all of history. That's crazy to think about.
Oh yeah totally off topic, I was drunk ranting last night.
- The Armchair Soldier
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: 29 Apr 2015, 08:31
- Contact:
-
- Member
- Posts: 83
- Joined: 29 Jul 2015, 07:28
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
From the HMS QNLZ twitter page still more shots.
I just find the night shots more evocative and somehow give a better impression of power.
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Stumbled accross this last night really shows the scale of the QEs when compared to our previous few carriers
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
I laugh at these scale pics jake 1992 , even the qe in this drawing shows 290 mtrs or more when its not , even against the other ships in the same graph .dint think ive ever seen a true scale graph yet against other vessels. They always show qe bigger than she really is .not a problem but dont belive the hype folks .just my take
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
I wasn't able to see the numbers on the scale at the top due to it becoming burly when zooming in on my phone. If it is show 290m odd then it could be out.inch wrote:I laugh at these scale pics jake 1992 , even the qe in this drawing shows 290 mtrs or more when its not , even against the other ships in the same graph .dint think ive ever seen a true scale graph yet against other vessels. They always show qe bigger than she really is .not a problem but dont belive the hype folks .just my take
It's a shame would be really nice to be able to find a reliable comparison between the QEs and our previous carriers
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
You can find shots when QNLZ was in drydock in Scotland, with Illustrious sat in the adjacent dock, that does a good job of it for me!Jake1992 wrote: It's a shame would be really nice to be able to find a reliable comparison between the QEs and our previous carriers
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Oh yh Iv seen that it's a nice image a illustrates the QEs size, I'd just like to see an actuate comparison with the audacious class ( the last full size carrier we had ) to give a true scale of why she's so big and so powerful for the RN lol that's just meDefiance wrote:You can find shots when QNLZ was in drydock in Scotland, with Illustrious sat in the adjacent dock, that does a good job of it for me!Jake1992 wrote: It's a shame would be really nice to be able to find a reliable comparison between the QEs and our previous carriers
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Defiance wrote:You can find shots when QNLZ was in drydock in Scotland, with Illustrious sat in the adjacent dock, that does a good job of it for me!
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Seems USS Lassen has temporaily taken over the QE escort role.
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Declarations of WW1 were still written in French...sunstersun wrote:nah, it was the Seven Years War. That war ensured that NA would speak English, which Bismarck said would be the most consequential geopolitical situation in the 20th century.abc123 wrote:Offtopic a bit, don't you think? And I disagree, it was WW1 not Seven-Years War...sunstersun wrote:
Also the seven years war basically KO'd France's chance of lingua franca. Secured English for all of history. That's crazy to think about.
Oh yeah totally off topic, I was drunk ranting last night.
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4111
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
One is impressive, but two together is going to be awesome
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Hopefuly one day we'll see them both like that with a good number of F35s on board each like the cgiPoiuytrewq wrote:One is impressive, but two together is going to be awesome
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
I was just thinking that the CGI of both carriers together only leaves 17 F-35s back in the U.K.!*
* Assuming that there is a total purchase of 48, none of the aircraft in the image are from allied nations and all the aircraft are visible with none in the hanger.
* Assuming that there is a total purchase of 48, none of the aircraft in the image are from allied nations and all the aircraft are visible with none in the hanger.
- CR4ZYHOR5E
- Member
- Posts: 76
- Joined: 02 May 2015, 10:57
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Anyone know if the deck is going to be repainted? I still can’t quite get my head around how worn and weathered the deck looks...has done since she came out of Rosyth....what’s the deal with that?
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
In a controversial quote in a book I am reading a senior member of RUSI has stated the MoD and RN are revisiting how they new carriers will be operated. Instead of the carrier being the core element of the Carrier group it role would shift to supporting the other vessels in the group. The reason for this is that the carriers will not themselves carry the necessary firepower to carry out the planned "Carrier strike", role for which there were envisioned and so will provide support in the form of missions in Air Defence, ELINT, electronic and visual surveillance and attack for the other vessels in the task force. In seems to me to be the next chapter in the "What do we do with the carrier" sage where they went from full carriers with a 36 aircraft compliment of F-35s to meet a sortie rate at a certain level to flexible aviation platforms with tailored air groups to this.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
I take it that these would be Carrier Resourced Air Patrols? I refuse to be the first to devise and use the apparent acronym!
Oh and by the way, apart from Tomahawk, what other weapons do the other vessels have that could get anywhere near the combat radius of an F35B.
If true, these "people" are obviously not to be trusted to do anything useful in the defence of the country.
Oh and by the way, apart from Tomahawk, what other weapons do the other vessels have that could get anywhere near the combat radius of an F35B.
If true, these "people" are obviously not to be trusted to do anything useful in the defence of the country.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Jake 1992 Wrote:-
It's a shame would be really nice to be able to find a reliable comparison between the QEs and our previous carriers
Even allowing for the fact that the sterns of QEC and Invincible Classes are not aligned correctly with the other carriers, QE class are not far off the 284 Metres that they actually are. The image here may be nearer 290 Metres, but it is close enough to be a fair representation relative to the sizes of the other carriers. There is one qualification here however, namely the Audacious class carrier shown is HMS Eagle, which did not have the deck extensions that were fitted to HMS Ark Royal, when she operated with a Phantom/Buccaneer/Gannet/Sea King/Wessex Air Wing. Thus Ark Royal would have looked a little larger!
I wasn't able to see the numbers on the scale at the top due to it becoming burly when zooming in on my phone. If it is show 290m odd then it could be out.
It's a shame would be really nice to be able to find a reliable comparison between the QEs and our previous carriers
Even allowing for the fact that the sterns of QEC and Invincible Classes are not aligned correctly with the other carriers, QE class are not far off the 284 Metres that they actually are. The image here may be nearer 290 Metres, but it is close enough to be a fair representation relative to the sizes of the other carriers. There is one qualification here however, namely the Audacious class carrier shown is HMS Eagle, which did not have the deck extensions that were fitted to HMS Ark Royal, when she operated with a Phantom/Buccaneer/Gannet/Sea King/Wessex Air Wing. Thus Ark Royal would have looked a little larger!
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Funnily enough, Jerry Kyd says QE is 290 metres long at 0:32....
(USNI News) 4 October 2018
A view of F-35B takeoff from the forward island bridge....
(ON THE ROGER) 2 October 2018 (recorded by RAF Air Marshal Stuart Atha)
(USNI News) 4 October 2018
A view of F-35B takeoff from the forward island bridge....
(ON THE ROGER) 2 October 2018 (recorded by RAF Air Marshal Stuart Atha)
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Looking at that shot and remembering that at one time they were talking 300odd metres long, would it have fit in that dock or was another dock being planned to be used?RichardIC wrote:Defiance wrote:You can find shots when QNLZ was in drydock in Scotland, with Illustrious sat in the adjacent dock, that does a good job of it for me!
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Definitly agreed, IF we ever see them together like that and IF they buy enough planes and IF the RAF releases them for carrier service...Poiuytrewq wrote:One is impressive, but two together is going to be awesome
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Did I leave the gas on when I left POW?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.