Ron5 wrote:Not if your VLS isn't long enough.
That's the question isn't it. Have the RN allowed any room for growth, perhaps not on T23. But T26 and T31? Who knows.
Pretty sure it would fit on the MAN Land Ceptor unit though..
Ron5 wrote:Not if your VLS isn't long enough.
Timmymagic wrote:Ron5 wrote:Not if your VLS isn't long enough.
That's the question isn't it. Have the RN allowed any room for growth, perhaps not on T23. But T26 and T31? Who knows.
Pretty sure it would fit on the MAN Land Ceptor unit though..
Not if your VLS isn't long enough.
That's the question isn't it. Have the RN allowed any room for growth, perhaps not on T23.
ArmChairCivvy wrote:Not if your VLS isn't long enough.
That's the question isn't it. Have the RN allowed any room for growth, perhaps not on T23.
See, it is the question of length and mushroom shape, coming together, on both sides of the Atlantic
... at least we are more civilisedabout it
Lord Jim wrote:Probably 3x the cost as well.
Timmymagic wrote:Ground launched C.uda...and no one ordered that either.
The previous spat was over Poland wanting the C&C module for use with their Patriots... and the US said "no cakeism... sorry! We want the system in service - and in due course we might sell it.NickC wrote:the current spate between the Germans and US
NickC wrote:when launched from the Russian Kaliningrad enclave on south coast of Baltic Sea bordering Poland can directly target Berlin)
NickC wrote: a leaker maybe version with its nuclear warhead hitting Berlin.
NickC wrote:Shades of UK/US 2005 F-35 dispute over the promised waiver
Lord Jim wrote:How effect is the land based version of Aster, used by the French and Italians? It that getting the same ABM update the navies of these countries are developing?
RetroSicotte wrote:Moderate. Good missile, but it's not anywhere close to being as BMD optimised. More aimed at SCUD etc.
ArmChairCivvy wrote:Anyway, things are happening... while Germany haggles with the US over access to secret missile-performance data.
- wasn't Italy on the MEADS wagon, too, at some point?
ArmChairCivvy wrote:Gabriele wrote:Brize Norton for permanent air mobility security taskings.
Does anyone happen to know of the "specialisms" that the different RAF Rgmnts might have?
- the NRBC role was short lived; hope something was left behind to help maintain base security also against non-kinetic (denial) attacks
ArmChairCivvy wrote:If we are serious about being able to protect forward air/ air-supply bases, the RAF Rgmnt should have a similar capability; does not matter if it is with the army, as long as they train together for deployments
- what would you rather drop from a commercially sourced drone: a single hand grenade, or something more potent (esp. if the OpFor is 'non-state')
Timmymagic wrote:Not seen anything about a replacement for Fuchs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests