Border Force Cutters.

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

River Batch 1s are simple vessel. Without CMS and any heavy weapons, it is easy to maintain, and cheap to operate. It weighs 1700t FL, designed to patrol around UK waters. If the theater of border force is to be enlarged out to hundreds of km from the coast, River B.1 will fit right.

Selling something and buying another always has some "loss", or overheads to the industries (promotion, support, sell/buy operations). River B.1s will be sold quite cheap. The new user will only pay for the "overheads", and there will be no income to HMG/MOD/RN, I'm afraid.

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

donald this is the issue EEZ protection is split between a variety of agencies with different focuses of roles. Personally I think this is wasteful and a single provider is the way ahead. whether that is the Royal Navy or the Border service. This patchwork has evolved over hundreds of years with the navy having been involved for most of that time.

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5545
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

Forming a "coast guard" is quite reasonable I think, since I am in a country having one of the largest coast guard in the world.

Please note that our coast guards is a "sea police" rather than a "4th military service". Lean manned, but have many civilian-standard vessels (built in many small ship-builders), which is cheap to buy and operate (but may not have proper damage control).

- 13,422 personel, 1.5 B$/yr
- 454 vessels/boats, 74 aircrafts, ~130 "coast-guard stations" (many are very small ones).

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

thats what the UK needs to consolidate things and to be honest to make it much more efficient and value for money.

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by shark bait »

It sure does need to consolidate it's resources, in the hands of a civilian organisation they could be spread further.
@LandSharkUK

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

shark bait wrote:It sure does need to consolidate it's resources, in the hands of a civilian organisation they could be spread further.

so the navy wouldn't need OPV's and the resources could be invested in a decent light frigate

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by shark bait »

I would still advocate forward deployed OPV's, much like the French.

Beyond that yes, focus on reinforcing the royal navy's core capabilities. Pounds spent on more patrol boats are pounds that can't be sent on core assets.
@LandSharkUK

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2783
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by Caribbean »

shark bait wrote:I would still advocate forward deployed OPV's, much like the French.
If our OPVs were like the Floreals, I would be quite happy to use them as guardships and in the anti-piracy/drug-running role (though I wouldn't insist on the two Exocet launchers, much as it would be highly entertaining to use one to stop a go-fast :)
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

the rivers are fairly close to the size of the floreals which the french classify as a light frigate built to commercial standards to the SOLAS regulations.

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2783
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by Caribbean »

marktigger wrote:the rivers are fairly close to the size of the floreals which the french classify as a light frigate built to commercial standards to the SOLAS regulations.
But with a helicopter, boats, Exocet, 100mm gun and 10,000nm range - not really that similar
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

yes and we accept the rivers as a great step forward for the fleet! that can be used in a very similar way to the Floreals deployed internationally on a variety of operations.

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2783
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by Caribbean »

Shall we take the River stuff over to the River thread :D

On Border Force cutters - they do seem like a very good design for the vast majority of the Border force stuff and would make a good standard for a "UKCG" cutter (it will be very interesting to see what is reported back from the various operations in the Med), but I do feel that they should be complemented by some larger vessels for Offshore work as well as a number of smaller fast boats for "rapid response" work
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

the rivers should be going to the Border force not the navy. As there should be 1 force to police the UK EEZ and enforce the variety of legislation as it applies.


User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by shark bait »

Agreed we do, especially if we are using some to contribute to frontex.

Also does any one know what this is? Is a boat from the Plymouth herald article that I don't recognise Image
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
GibMariner
Senior Member
Posts: 1351
Joined: 12 May 2015, 14:17

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by GibMariner »

That looks like the former HMC Sentinel, decommissioned a couple of years ago.

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

one of the former customs cutters senteniel

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

looks like border force needs cutters closer to home with more RN OPV's

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36407685

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4579
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by Repulse »

marktigger wrote:looks like border force needs cutters closer to home with more RN OPV's

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36407685
Agreed, it's just the start. With an increase in illegal migration, terrorism and Russian sub incursions it's time the UK got serious about its EEZ. It will also need to contend with friction over fisheries when we vote to leave.

I'd personally scrap the cutters and have custom boarding parties on RN ships.

What the RN needs is the next generation sloops (OPV/Survey/MCM replacements) and modern day small fast interceptor Patrol craft (of the MGB/MTB ilk).
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

there was article in mail about how many isolated harbours and marinas there are in uk and how they aren't policed. given out history of smuggling especially in isolated coastal areas we need to start doing allot more

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... gency.html

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4579
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by Repulse »

Retasking the 14 P2000s that are attached to the universitys would be a good start and also keeping the 3 batch 1 Rivers with ScanEagle in addition the 3 new ones. Problem is money, but it would be chicken feed compared to the potential cost of an even greater flood of migrants.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

its not just a seaborne response the Border guard and the police don't have the resources either

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

Repulse wrote:
marktigger wrote:looks like border force needs cutters closer to home with more RN OPV's

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36407685
Agreed, it's just the start. With an increase in illegal migration, terrorism and Russian sub incursions it's time the UK got serious about its EEZ. It will also need to contend with friction over fisheries when we vote to leave.

I'd personally scrap the cutters and have custom boarding parties on RN ships.

What the RN needs is the next generation sloops (OPV/Survey/MCM replacements) and modern day small fast interceptor Patrol craft (of the MGB/MTB ilk).
the OPV/Surv/MCMV sloop will end up with fewer hulls doing the same number of taskings so with no spare capicity
I would back MAFF,BGS and customs boarding officers as part of a RN patrol force the Kiwis do it.
as to more coastal vessels i think the BGS STAN sutters would be good in this role of for faster smaller the CB90.

there needs to be an expansion the 5 rivers being built at present should loose the global role and be home only. the 3 batch 1 should go to the BGS as additional vessels.

User avatar
Engaging Strategy
Member
Posts: 775
Joined: 20 Dec 2015, 13:45
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by Engaging Strategy »

Repulse wrote:Retasking the 14 P2000s that are attached to the universitys would be a good start and also keeping the 3 batch 1 Rivers with ScanEagle in addition the 3 new ones. Problem is money, but it would be chicken feed compared to the potential cost of an even greater flood of migrants.
As much as raiding the P2000 fleet to bolster EEZ protection seems attractive on the surface, having been aboard them first hand I can tell you that they're really not suitable for that sort of work. Sure, with the new engines they can go like the clappers but their sea state limitations are pretty severe and they can't carry enough people for an adequate boarding team. Nor can they carry a decent seaboat. Personally I wouldn't like to contemplate doing a bump transfer of a boarding team from a ship that rolls around like nobody's business in anything more than a sea state 2!

Better to leave them in the current navigation and command training role with flag flying and drumming up recruits through the URNUs as useful add-ons.
Blog: http://engagingstrategy.blogspot.co.uk
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Border Force Cutters.

Post by marktigger »

something like the STAN 4207 would be a good option

Post Reply