River Class (OPV) (RN)

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5603
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

HMS Forth continues her task, now in South Georgia. Beautiful photo.

These users liked the author donald_of_tokyo for the post (total 4):
JackstarTempest414wargame_insomniacserge750

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5603
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

And, HMS Trent in Caribbean ocean...


User avatar
Ianmb17
Member
Posts: 147
Joined: 01 May 2015, 21:33
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ianmb17 »

Do we need something on River B2 in Falklands to combat these
Argentina now has Hero 30 and Hero 120

https://www.zona-militar.com/2023/12/08 ... -30-y-120/

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4737
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Ianmb17 wrote: 19 Dec 2023, 00:20 Do we need something on River B2 in Falklands to combat these
Argentina now has Hero 30 and Hero 120
30nm max range, so nothing to be too concerned about - however a modest upgrade to a 40 or 57mm gun could be added without much fuss.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5629
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Tempest414 »

Repulse wrote: 19 Dec 2023, 07:55
Ianmb17 wrote: 19 Dec 2023, 00:20 Do we need something on River B2 in Falklands to combat these
Argentina now has Hero 30 and Hero 120
30nm max range, so nothing to be too concerned about - however a modest upgrade to a 40 or 57mm gun could be added without much fuss.
I have said in the past that we should have Hero 120 on the B2's with there 65KM range and 1 hour endurance

as said in the escort thread with the world becoming more unstable I feel we really need to upgrade the RB2's with NS50 4D radar , 40mm main gun , 4 x 12.7mm and 2 x 8 round Starstreak/ LMM mounts plus a Camcopter with I-Master radar this would allow a RB2 to defend its self against most things up to early gen ASM's

User avatar
Ian Hall
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 18 Jun 2023, 14:55
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ian Hall »

These users liked the author Ian Hall for the post (total 3):
donald_of_tokyoRepulseJackstar

User avatar
Ian Hall
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 18 Jun 2023, 14:55
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ian Hall »

BBC News - Guyana: UK to send warship to South America amid Venezuela tensions
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67806227
These users liked the author Ian Hall for the post:
serge750

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4737
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

A sensible and appropriate defence diplomacy move.
These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 3):
Ian Halldonald_of_tokyoserge750
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

wargame_insomniac
Senior Member
Posts: 1150
Joined: 20 Nov 2021, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by wargame_insomniac »

Would feel better if we had a destroyer at high readiness ready to sail to backup Trent if open warfare does break out.
These users liked the author wargame_insomniac for the post:
abc123

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5629
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Tempest414 »

wargame_insomniac wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 11:30 Would feel better if we had a destroyer at high readiness ready to sail to backup Trent if open warfare does break out.
The best thing to send now would be the 16AA high readiness battle group on a training ex and given the land there the Gurkha regt maybe the best option

And again this brings us back to what I said about China and Russia pushing into the Atlantic we are going to need to be able to protect our interests in both the North and South Atlantic and the Indian Ocean

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5805
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by SW1 »



We’ll be sending them to the gulf next.

User avatar
Ian Hall
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 18 Jun 2023, 14:55
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ian Hall »


User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5629
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Tempest414 »

Repulse wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 10:21 A sensible and appropriate defence diplomacy move.
or more to the point all we have got

we really need to get on and upgrade the RB2's fast

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4737
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Tempest414 wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 14:39
Repulse wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 10:21 A sensible and appropriate defence diplomacy move.
or more to the point all we have got

we really need to get on and upgrade the RB2's fast
I think a River is perfect for this - it’s showing intent but cannot be argued to raise tensions.

Proliferation of UAVs is definitely a concern, as are fast boats - both that could easily be addressed with some cheap modifications starting with a 57mm gun and a LMM armed UAV. The intention would not be to fight but to deter.
These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 3):
donald_of_tokyoJensywargame_insomniac
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1717
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Scimitar54 »

Logical way to go about this, would be to remove the 5 x 57mm from the T31s and fit them to the RB2s, then fit a (simpler) 127mm Gun to each of the 5 x T31s. Improved deterrent effect across 2 x Classes of Ship. :mrgreen:
These users liked the author Scimitar54 for the post (total 2):
JensySouthcoastsam

User avatar
Jensy
Moderator
Posts: 1089
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Jensy »

Repulse wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 14:45
Tempest414 wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 14:39
Repulse wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 10:21 A sensible and appropriate defence diplomacy move.
or more to the point all we have got

we really need to get on and upgrade the RB2's fast
I think a River is perfect for this - it’s showing intent but cannot be argued to raise tensions.

Proliferation of UAVs is definitely a concern, as are fast boats - both that could easily be addressed with some cheap modifications starting with a 57mm gun and a LMM armed UAV. The intention would not be to fight but to deter.
Agreed on all points.

As much fun as it might be to see a CSG steaming over there, it would give the Venezuelans a perfect justification for their 'Guyana is still a British colony' argument. The narrative that's being fed to the local population and other Bolivarian leaning South American political parties to justify the invasion.

Should the conflict escalate, so too can our reponse but for now a River says all that needs to be said.
These users liked the author Jensy for the post (total 3):
RepulseNimonicserge750
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1561
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by tomuk »

Jensy wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 16:08
Repulse wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 14:45
Tempest414 wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 14:39
Repulse wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 10:21 A sensible and appropriate defence diplomacy move.
or more to the point all we have got

we really need to get on and upgrade the RB2's fast
I think a River is perfect for this - it’s showing intent but cannot be argued to raise tensions.

Proliferation of UAVs is definitely a concern, as are fast boats - both that could easily be addressed with some cheap modifications starting with a 57mm gun and a LMM armed UAV. The intention would not be to fight but to deter.
Agreed on all points.

As much fun as it might be to see a CSG steaming over there, it would give the Venezuelans a perfect justification for their 'Guyana is still a British colony' argument. The narrative that's being fed to the local population and other Bolivarian leaning South American political parties to justify the invasion.

Should the conflict escalate, so too can our reponse but for now a River says all that needs to be said.
I'd be much happier with a T23GP.
These users liked the author tomuk for the post (total 2):
SW1Jensy

User avatar
Jensy
Moderator
Posts: 1089
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Jensy »

tomuk wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 17:43 I'd be much happier with a T23GP.
I think I would too, particularly if I was on board. However we are deploying to what is still a location of heightened tensions, rather than a war zone, so it's more a tool of brinkmanship.

Makes a fairly good case for procuring additional Type 31 though. Possibly more than an uparmed River Class.
These users liked the author Jensy for the post:
wargame_insomniac
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4737
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

tomuk wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 17:43 I'd be much happier with a T23GP.
Why? If you sent a T23 is would be seen as an escalation and colonial style interference. If you are not intending to start something don’t raise the stakes, by all means have SSNs / CSG in your back pocket if someone else starts something, but this isn’t about the UK imposing its will, it’s about showing solidarity.
These users liked the author Repulse for the post (total 2):
Ian HallNimonic
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Online
new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by new guy »

Ian Hall wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 08:05 BBC News - Guyana: UK to send warship to South America amid Venezuela tensions
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67806227
Again, BBC defence article quality:
States wrong crew number
States wrong ship speed
It says that the Guyana Georgetown port is too shallow for HMS Trent to come alongside , despite it not being so, proven both by the sources of the port and the ships that visit it.
Oh and calls a OPV and warship.
These users liked the author new guy for the post:
Jackstar

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1561
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by tomuk »

Repulse wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 23:53
tomuk wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 17:43 I'd be much happier with a T23GP.
Why? If you sent a T23 is would be seen as an escalation and colonial style interference. If you are not intending to start something don’t raise the stakes, by all means have SSNs / CSG in your back pocket if someone else starts something, but this isn’t about the UK imposing its will, it’s about showing solidarity.
The River all over the press is being described as a warship and I can't see why the Venezuelans would see the distinction either.

It isn't a colonial issue or the UK being seen to impose its will. Guyana is sovereign country and as it stands under international law while disputed the territory is part of Guyana and not for annexing by their neighbour.

You keep making a point of surge fleets and holding things in reserve. What circumstances would you use said reserve or surge? Is not the threatened integrity of one country by a belligerent neighbour not one such circumstance?

If as you suggested that the Rivers were upgraded with 57mm and a UAV with LMM. Would they then not be too capable not to be seen as an escalation?

What do we do then send a commandeered trawler?

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5629
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Tempest414 »

new guy wrote: 26 Dec 2023, 00:12
Ian Hall wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 08:05 BBC News - Guyana: UK to send warship to South America amid Venezuela tensions
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67806227
Again, BBC defence article quality:
States wrong crew number
States wrong ship speed
It says that the Guyana Georgetown port is too shallow for HMS Trent to come alongside , despite it not being so, proven both by the sources of the port and the ships that visit it.
Oh and calls a OPV and warship.
Yes some bad press but the crew size is right as the RB'2 have 65 with 45 aboard at anytime and the Speed is right too at 24 knots some say 25 knots but 1 knot is here or there is knit picking

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5629
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Tempest414 »

tomuk wrote: 26 Dec 2023, 01:11
Repulse wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 23:53
tomuk wrote: 24 Dec 2023, 17:43 I'd be much happier with a T23GP.
Why? If you sent a T23 is would be seen as an escalation and colonial style interference. If you are not intending to start something don’t raise the stakes, by all means have SSNs / CSG in your back pocket if someone else starts something, but this isn’t about the UK imposing its will, it’s about showing solidarity.
The River all over the press is being described as a warship and I can't see why the Venezuelans would see the distinction either.

It isn't a colonial issue or the UK being seen to impose its will. Guyana is sovereign country and as it stands under international law while disputed the territory is part of Guyana and not for annexing by their neighbour.

You keep making a point of surge fleets and holding things in reserve. What circumstances would you use said reserve or surge? Is not the threatened integrity of one country by a belligerent neighbour not one such circumstance?

If as you suggested that the Rivers were upgraded with 57mm and a UAV with LMM. Would they then not be too capable not to be seen as an escalation?

What do we do then send a commandeered trawler?
If we had a T-23 ready I would send it as a T-23 as and of its self is not a big deal how ever if thing turn fast we are not just dealing with some 76mm armed patrol ships and fast attack boats but also a airforce with F-16's and SU-30's

Now for me as said fitting the RB2's with a NS50 radar to give them better eyes and ears plus a 40mm , 2 x 8 round Starstreak / LMM mounts for better defence and the new Camcopter for eyes OTH really needs start ASAP as we are starting to see thing go down hill fast

User avatar
Ian Hall
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 18 Jun 2023, 14:55
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ian Hall »

If we had a T-23 ready I would send it as a T-23 as and of its self is not a big deal how ever if thing turn fast we are not just dealing with some 76mm armed patrol ships and fast attack boats :x but also a airforce with F-16's and SU-30's
At the risk of an egregious diversion the article at link gives an insight into the state Venezuela's SU-30s https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_te ... -7202.html
To what extent are Venezuela's F16s still serviceable in the face of longstanding US sanctions is an interesting question.

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4737
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

tomuk wrote: 26 Dec 2023, 01:11 The River all over the press is being described as a warship and I can't see why the Venezuelans would see the distinction either.
Poor defence reporting is what it is - one thing for sure is that will not a centre spread about how many missiles it has etc. Regardless, if a T31 turned with its coveted MK41 tubes with land strike missiles, then Venezuela would have a legitimate reason to feel threatened.
It isn't a colonial issue or the UK being seen to impose its will.
Sorry, but it’s a very naive view. Just read the global mood - the reason why India for example sits on the fence is that both Russia and China are using the colonial card to maximum effect.
You keep making a point of surge fleets and holding things in reserve. What circumstances would you use said reserve or surge?
It’s not difficult when there is credible and published intelligence that Venezuela is about to attack or they have. It’s the grey war that is the killer, but they are trying to escalate so you need to play a different game.
If as you suggested that the Rivers were upgraded with 57mm and a UAV with LMM. Would they then not be too capable not to be seen as an escalation?
If escalation happens that’s when the tier one force arrives. Again, the Rivers are about presence and need a level of self defence, not fighting.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Post Reply