Australian Defence Force
Re: Australian Defence Force
Let's be clear this has been a humiliation of strategic proportions for France only seven months before its Presidential and parliamentary elections. International relations with France can expect to be difficult for quite a while.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
Re: Australian Defence Force
At least until the French have rid themselves of “Macron-omics”, after the Elections.
- Zero Gravitas
- Member
- Posts: 293
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 22:36
Re: Australian Defence Force
The BBC's analysis has been pretty woeful:
"France's decision to recall its ambassadors is probably unprecedented. The country is America's "oldest ally," as a White House official noted. He said Washington would be engaged with France in the coming days to resolve their differences.
But this looks at the very least like an embarrassing misjudgement by an administration that has promised to work closely with allies."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58604677
Really? Embarrassing misjudgement? Where is the context about China's "wolf warrior" diplomacy towards Australia? How about a pretty basic line suggesting that defence procurement influences your alliances and if you are planning on standing up to China then the US is a more formidable ally by a couple of orders of magnitude than France?
Yesterday the beeb had: "The US and UK are facing growing international criticism over a new security pact signed with Australia."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-58592613
The criticism they quote was solely from China and France.
"France's decision to recall its ambassadors is probably unprecedented. The country is America's "oldest ally," as a White House official noted. He said Washington would be engaged with France in the coming days to resolve their differences.
But this looks at the very least like an embarrassing misjudgement by an administration that has promised to work closely with allies."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58604677
Really? Embarrassing misjudgement? Where is the context about China's "wolf warrior" diplomacy towards Australia? How about a pretty basic line suggesting that defence procurement influences your alliances and if you are planning on standing up to China then the US is a more formidable ally by a couple of orders of magnitude than France?
Yesterday the beeb had: "The US and UK are facing growing international criticism over a new security pact signed with Australia."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-58592613
The criticism they quote was solely from China and France.
Re: Australian Defence Force
Well what do you expect from pro EU / leftist BBC , so out of touch with people in this country ,that's why they keep getting it wrong and pandering to the left / EU brigade ,ooh USA/ Brexit bad , anything EU / France ,Germany good lol get real
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
-
- Member
- Posts: 335
- Joined: 01 Jul 2020, 19:15
Re: Australian Defence Force
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... r-row.html
According to The Times, the AUKUS deal was codenamed Operation Hookless inside Number 10 and was the most closely guarded secret inside government for many years.
Among the tiny number of people in the know – besides the PM – were outgoing Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, National Security advisor Sir Stephen Lovegrove and First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Tony Radakin.
The clandestine discussions were said by a defence source to be like a scene from a John Le Carré novel.
Re: Australian Defence Force
The deal was done when the UK promised the inmates of Her Majesty's Prison Australia that a early release or a pardon might be considered...
Re: Australian Defence Force
When asked on the France 2 radio station why his Ambassador to London had not been recalled too, Mr Le Drian suggested there was no need.
Britain was known for its 'permanent opportunism' and Mr Johnson was deemed the 'fifth wheel on the carriage anyway,' said French Foreign Minister Le Drian.
In his furious attack on all three members of the new AUKUS pact – America, Australia and Britain – Mr Le Drian said all had acted disgracefully.
Re: Australian Defence Force
SKB wrote:The deal was done when the UK promised the inmates of Her Majesty's Prison Australia that a early release or a pardon might be considered...
Re: Australian Defence Force
They must have really been hurt when Australia approached us to try get nukes than themtomuk wrote:When asked on the France 2 radio station why his Ambassador to London had not been recalled too, Mr Le Drian suggested there was no need.
Britain was known for its 'permanent opportunism' and Mr Johnson was deemed the 'fifth wheel on the carriage anyway,' said French Foreign Minister Le Drian.
In his furious attack on all three members of the new AUKUS pact – America, Australia and Britain – Mr Le Drian said all had acted disgracefully.
Re: Australian Defence Force
One wonders how different it might have been if the contract for the 12 Shortfin Barracuda/ Attack class boats had been going well, rather than being one of escalating time, cost and complexity? Perhaps the Aussies might have been willing to accept some of the SSKs and have the balance delivered as SSNs.
What isn't often mentioned in the press is that Le Drian was French defence minister when the Barracuda class contract was negotiated and signed with Australia. So a lot of responsibility must rest on his shoulders.
What isn't often mentioned in the press is that Le Drian was French defence minister when the Barracuda class contract was negotiated and signed with Australia. So a lot of responsibility must rest on his shoulders.
Re: Australian Defence Force
Also wondering how much UK plc work will come uk way ? If weapons, systems,and choose Virginia class as base with us reactor tech ,it would be near as 100% win for America and maybe only help training coming uk way ?
Re: Australian Defence Force
No one will know for certain, but if the cost and timetable and risk didn’t blow out we would not be where we areJ. Tattersall wrote:One wonders how different it might have been if the contract for the 12 Shortfin Barracuda/ Attack class boats had been going well, rather than being one of escalating time, cost and complexity? Perhaps the Aussies might have been willing to accept some of the SSKs and have the balance delivered as SSNs.
What isn't often mentioned in the press is that Le Drian was French defence minister when the Barracuda class contract was negotiated and signed with Australia. So a lot of responsibility must rest on his shoulders.
12 boats didn’t mean 12 in the water
Re: Australian Defence Force
For those following the AUKUS controversy on Twitter it does seem to me that in Britain the debate seems to divide itself along Brexit Remainer / Leaver lines (e.g. @CER_IanBond) Something I must say I feel very sad about.
I must say I don't like the Daily Telegraph but this article by Prof Vernon Bogdanor last month does now seem quite prescient https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tele ... tish/amp/
I must say I don't like the Daily Telegraph but this article by Prof Vernon Bogdanor last month does now seem quite prescient https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tele ... tish/amp/
Re: Australian Defence Force
(Binkov's Battlegrounds) 16th September 2021
This newsflash video goes in depth on the biggest piece of news in geopolitics in years. A new military alliance in the Pacific created. And kickstarted by Australia getting nuclear fueled submarines. To find out more, watch the video!
And this video hasn't aged well....
Re: Australian Defence Force
The Mail is claiming that Australia will consider leasing US subs to fill the gap between now and the first Oz-built subs hitting the water. Also stating that the reactor tech was the game-changer, as the fact that the reactor could last the life of the boat means that there is no need to develop a domestic nuclear industry, which brought the Labour Party on-board
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
Re: Australian Defence Force
Highly unlikely unless the US crew the reactor spaces, cant see the RAN being ready for at least 5 years to get proper pipeline in place, i suppose it would be a good gig if the RAN just place either UK/US reactor schools for initial employment training. But I imagine all this will become in-house at some time in the futureCaribbean wrote:The Mail is claiming that Australia will consider leasing US subs to fill the gap between now and the first Oz-built subs hitting the water. Also stating that the reactor tech was the game-changer, as the fact that the reactor could last the life of the boat means that there is no need to develop a domestic nuclear industry, which brought the Labour Party on-board
I cant verify any of this, but it seems from this fellow on reddit that Nuclear Power School lasts about 18mths
Also I found this online gives a bit of information what prospective student need to learn
Nuclear Power School Prospective Junior Officer Student Information
https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103 ... -Sep20.pdf
- Zero Gravitas
- Member
- Posts: 293
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 22:36
Re: Australian Defence Force
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58614229.amp
“ When they have picked themselves up from their humiliation, the French will need to gather their sangfroid and confront some cruel verities.
Number one: there is no sentiment in geostrategy.
The French must see there is no point in wailing about having been shoddily treated. They were.
But who ever heard of a nation short-changing its defence priorities out of not wanting to give offence? The fact is that the Australians calculated they had underestimated the Chinese threat and so needed to boost their level of deterrence.
They acted with steely disregard for French concerns but, when it comes to the crunch, that is what nations do. It is almost the definition of a nation: a group of people who have come together to defend their own interests. Their own, not others'.”
In contrast to my moan about the beeb up above…
“ When they have picked themselves up from their humiliation, the French will need to gather their sangfroid and confront some cruel verities.
Number one: there is no sentiment in geostrategy.
The French must see there is no point in wailing about having been shoddily treated. They were.
But who ever heard of a nation short-changing its defence priorities out of not wanting to give offence? The fact is that the Australians calculated they had underestimated the Chinese threat and so needed to boost their level of deterrence.
They acted with steely disregard for French concerns but, when it comes to the crunch, that is what nations do. It is almost the definition of a nation: a group of people who have come together to defend their own interests. Their own, not others'.”
In contrast to my moan about the beeb up above…
Re: Australian Defence Force
Well it seems like the French want to push back and look at compensation, fair enough if this defence connect article is true it seems our liability for cancellation is a $404 million cancellation fee
https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/marit ... f-sea-1000
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-n ... ll-be-lost
But the French are doing what the French typical do when the throw the baby out with the bath water, seems they want to emulate the Chinese
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/fr ... d=msedgntp
https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/marit ... f-sea-1000
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-n ... ll-be-lost
Cheap price to pay if we are going to end up with a submarine that is better than what was proposedThe contract with France was written with several built-in escape clauses. Although the details remain secret, the Australian National Audit Office said the agreement “contains rights, remedies and incentives, including protections, ‘control gates’ in the form of mandated system reviews based on defined exit and entry criteria, and establishes contractual off-ramps”.
The ABC reported in 2019 that the confidential overarching contract – the strategic partnering agreement – would see Australia pay about $400m if it pulled out after the design was completed but before a submarine was completed.
But the French are doing what the French typical do when the throw the baby out with the bath water, seems they want to emulate the Chinese
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/fr ... d=msedgntp
Didn't work for the chinese really the French think its going to work with themFrance is seeking to intercept Europe-Australia's Free Trade Agreement by asking EU countries to reconsider the deal in retaliation to the Morrison government scrapping the $90 billion submarine deal.
Re: Australian Defence Force
By my calculation that's just over £200 million, so relatively modest.R686 wrote: Well it seems like the French want to push back and look at compensation, fair enough if this defence connect article is true it seems our liability for cancellation is a $404 million cancellation fee
Re: Australian Defence Force
We could see RAN personnel aboard Royal Navy SSNs in the near future I hope, in order for them to start gaining experience, after having gone through the RN's Submariner rain Course first. The same should also be happening with the USN, regardless of where they go for their new boats. AS for leasing a USN submarine, it would have to be a Los Angeles class as they haven't got enough Virginias to meet the USN needs.
Re: Australian Defence Force
If they were happy to wait for SSKs then they'll be even more happy to wait for SSNs. They aren't about to rush into operating nuc boats without a real solid baseline of experience.Lord Jim wrote:We could see RAN personnel aboard Royal Navy SSNs in the near future I hope, in order for them to start gaining experience, after having gone through the RN's Submariner rain Course first. The same should also be happening with the USN, regardless of where they go for their new boats. AS for leasing a USN submarine, it would have to be a Los Angeles class as they haven't got enough Virginias to meet the USN needs.
They'll probably do what we've done with E-7 crews (Aus partners on our boats and gaining experience through responsibility) for a long time. They need to chew through how we/US do things and combine that with their operational thinking to generate their own procedures.
Re: Australian Defence Force
This article provides some details of the ongoing issues the Australian government faced with the canceled submarine project ,of perhaps interest is an earlier report calling for its cancellation by a former U.S. secretary of the navy David Winter in 2018 of the French submarine project in a report previously made public if France was blindsided by this and were not taking this seriously they were asleep certainly this concern was raised in its own parliament this year
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-paci ... 021-09-21/
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-paci ... 021-09-21/
-
- Member
- Posts: 335
- Joined: 01 Jul 2020, 19:15
Re: Australian Defence Force
The USA / UK and Australia need to let the French have their tantrum and give them nothing in return as nothing is due. The French dropped the ball on this - why should their be any compensation or "favours" to "buy them off" ?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1354
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52
Re: Australian Defence Force
Whether you like it or not, the majority of UK ISTAR capability (Optics, acoustics) and Sonar engineering capability is partially owned by the French state...TheLoneRanger wrote:The USA / UK and Australia need to let the French have their tantrum and give them nothing in return as nothing is due. The French dropped the ball on this - why should their be any compensation or "favours" to "buy them off" ?